CENTRAL ASIA AS A SPACE, POLITY, PEOPLES, AND FATE

Farkhod TOLIPOV

---

Farkhod Tolipov, Ph.D. (Political Science), assistant professor, University of World Economy and Diplomacy (Tashkent, Uzbekistan)

---

Introduction

The study of contemporary Central Asia encounters problems of ontology and conceptualization. Not only current scholarly works on Central Asia, especially after 11 September 2001, but also recent post-independence studies of the region lack adequate and strong scientific approaches. The spectrum of incorrect views on Central Asia ranges from assertions about Uzbekistan’s expansionism and hegemonism in the region and a prognosis of the “Balkanization” of Central Asia to rejection of the applicability of the regional integration concept with regard to the five countries of the region on the grounds that their cultures and political systems are too different. What is more, most locals, that is, Central Asians themselves, have been carried away by the perceptional works Western scholars have presented to them and written about them.

What is Central Asia? For Westerners it is there, for locals it is here. Is it strictly definable? People have an idea of America, an idea of Europe, an idea of Eurasia, etc. Does anyone have an idea of Central Asia? I cannot help but recall Edward Said’s research. An interesting methodological warning can be found in his Orientalism that as……………

---

Please fill subscription form to obtain full text of this jounal