POWER, REVOLUTION, AND BUSINESS IN POST-REVOLUTIONARY GEORGIA
(Part One)

Valerian DOLIDZE


Valerian Dolidze, Ph.D. (Hist.), assistant professor at Tbilisi State University (Tbilisi, Georgia)


There is the opinion that the method by which a political leader is replaced, or his own attitude to his possible loss of power, is part of his political heritage and affects the countrys democratic development. If the first leader of a newly formed political system is replaced, this heritage becomes even more important. The point is amply illustrated by fifteen years of Georgias political independence. It changed its political leaders twice, each time with violence and violations of the Constitution. Each time the change was carried out under democratic banners, and each time authoritarian trends in the countrys political system became more pronounced: after coming to power each of the new leaders wanted to preserve it. To achieve this, they sought for economic domination to get a grip on badly needed material and financial resources. So each of the new leaders tried to place private business under his political control. The Georgian Constitution, however, guarantees protection of private property; the new leaders are also limited by the liberal Constitution in many other respects, the countrys financial and political dependence on the West, and its desire to integrate into the European structures. This forces each of the new leaders to use methods which will not damage the countrys democratic image. Political pressure on the business community became especially obvious after the Rose Revolution; today it is barely concealed and.


Please fill subscription form to obtain full text of this jounal

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 - Advertorial UP - E-MAIL