AUTHORITARIAN/CONSTITUTIONAL-PATRONAGE REGIMES IN CENTRAL ASIA

Ertan EFEGİL


Ertan Efegil, Dr., Beykent University, Department of International Relations (Istanbul, Turkey)


Introduction

The Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan and public demonstrations in Uzbekistan have drawn the attention of the outside world to the political realities and social conditions of these countries. As a result, those who have dealings with this part of the world have begun to ask the following questions: What caused these events to happen? Might we see similar events happening in neighboring countries in the near future?

In order to answer these questions it is necessary to go back several years. In 1991 when these countries unexpectedly gained independence, the leaders had to find radical and structural solutions to the extremely difficult conditionssocial, economic and politicalwhich prevailed in their societies at this time. Their long-term aim was to align their political and economic systems with those of the rest of the world. Although certain regional states possessed enormous reserves of natural gas and oil, they lacked both an efficient economic system and state institutions that would permit their countries to exercise their countrys responsibilities and rights according to international law. Moreover, the Nationalities Policy put forward by Joseph Stalin in 1924, had never been implemented. Their desire, at this stage, was therefore to construct a new state, which would aspire to a free market economy and democratic values.

Although the regional leaders originally promised to make.


Please fill subscription form to obtain full text of this jounal

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
UP - E-MAIL