THE REGIME AND THE REVOLUTION IN POST-SOVIET GEORGIA

Valerian DOLIDZE


Valerian Dolidze, Ph.D. (Hist.), associate professor at the Social-Political Department, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University (Tbilisi, Georgia)


Three revolutions, one after another, replaced the three post-communist leaders of Georgia: (1) the Round Table and Zviad Gamsakhurdia replaced the communists; (2) Gamsakhurdias cabinet was replaced by Eduard Shevardnadze, and (3) Mikhail Saakashvili removed Shevardnadze from his post. Each of them changed the fortunes of the country and the nation, but only the last event was tagged as a revolution. It is obviously viewed as the most important among the three and prompts us to ask whether it is absolutely correct to describe Saakashvilis coming to power as a revolution. Is it not a ploy designed to boost the importance of the regime change in the eyes of the world community and the local population? To answer these questions we should answer another, broader, question: Did the regime change that removed Eduard Shevardnadze and became known as the Rose Revolution have the characteristics of a revolution?

By revolution we mean the very specific and profound impact a regime exerts on social orderit is much more than a conflict that replaces the government. A revolution brings about changes in the political, economic, spiritual, and social spheres of the nations life, which take some time to become obvious and are never immediately manifest the very day after forces come to power which choose to call themselves revolutionary. The events of November 2003 in Georgia were called a revolution immediately after the coup was completed. During the three years that separate us from that time enough material has been accumulated to assess the nature of the changes that have taken place and were brought about by Mikhail Saakashvilis coming to power. The Rose Revolution is a..


Please fill subscription form to obtain full text of this jounal

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
UP - E-MAIL