CENTRAL ASIA TODAY: A NEW WAVE OF WATER AND ENERGY COOPERATION AND PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE

Authors

  • Sergey ZHILTSOV D.Sc. (Political Science), Head of the Department of olitical Science and Political Philosophy of the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Lidiya PARKHOMCHIK Senior Research Fellow, Eurasian Research Institute (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author
  • Dmitriy SLISOVSKIY D.Sc. (Hist.), Professor of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Nikolay MEDVEDEV D.Sc. (Political Science), Professor, Faculty of Humanitarian and Social Sciences, eoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) Moscow, Russian Federation) Author

Keywords:

Central Asia, water resources, energy policy, oil, gas, pipelines, Russia, the U.S., the EU, China.

Abstract

In recent years, Central Asian countries have shown a readiness to increase their involvement in regional cooperation and interaction, particularly in the water, energy, and transportation sectors. These areas had long been neglected, which negatively impacted the regional economies.

Under mounting economic pressure and difficult situations, these countries had no choice but to revise their approaches to cooperation. Some external states have developed significant interest in the region’s countries, seeking a wider presence, especially in projects aimed at diversifying the supply of hydrocarbon reserves to external markets. Central Asian countries hoped that expanding pipeline infrastructure would consolidate their positions, help implement social and economic projects, create new jobs, open new opportunities for oil and gas exporters, and radically change the regional balance of power. As a result, they increased their efforts in extracting and exporting hydrocarbons.

These expectations were not fully realized. Dependence on external players as final consumers or transit territories was not significantly reduced. However, the new pipelines did break Russia's monopoly on hydrocarbon exports from the region, with Iran and China taking over. They used their control over price formation and purchase volumes to exert pressure on Central Asian exporters. The Central Asian states continued to expand their pipeline networks to reduce their dependence on neighboring countries.

Central Asian states are also rethinking their approaches to water use. The confrontations of the 1990s are being replaced with new initiatives for broader bilateral and multilateral cooperation in managing transboundary river water resources. The old problems inherited from the Soviet era, which were gradually ignored, have become more acute over time. Countries in the upper reaches of regional rivers face severe energy shortages in winter, while those in the lower reaches experience a critical water shortage in summer, crucial for agriculture.

After 2020-2025, water shortages in the region are expected to become absolute, with the total water consumption in Central Asian countries reaching levels that will force industrial enterprises to use less water. This situation will adversely affect regional economies and agriculture. Demographic growth and climate change will exacerbate these issues. Retreating glaciers and reduced snow cover threaten the runoff of the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers. The current push for compromises and consideration of all countries' interests is driven by the escalating problems in the water and energy sectors, primarily due to the unregulated use of transboundary river water.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: G.I. Starchenkov, “Neft Kaspia i puti ee transportirovki,” in: Musulmanskie strany u granits SNG, Institute of Oriental Studies RAS, Kraft+, Moscow, 2001, p. 298.

See: B. Schreiner, “Doc. 9635 Europe and the Development of Energy Resources in the Caspian Sea Region,” Work-ing Papers, 2003, Ordinary Session (First Part), Documents 9519, 9568 and 9576-9639—Council of Europe: Parliamentary Assembly, Vol. 1, 2003, pp. 303-315.

See: V.I. Kaliuzhny, “Vystuplenie na konferentsii ‘Neft i gaz Kaspiyskogo i Chernogo morey’, Stambul (Turtsia),27 maia 2003,” Vestnik Kaspia, No. 3, 2003, pp. 7-12.

See: I.S. Rozhkov, “Retrospektiva kaspiyskikh sammitov: ot stabilnosti k ptogressu,” Problemy postsovetskogo pros-transtva, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2017, pp. 210-220.

See: D. Bolekbaeva, I.F. Selivanova, “Osnovnye napravlenia vneshney politiki Kazakhstana (1991-2015 gg.),” in:

neshniaia politika novykh nezavisimykh gosudarstv: Collection, ed. by B.A. Shmelev, IE RAN, Moscow, 2015, p. 230.

See: S.A. Mikheev, A.E. Chebotarev, G.S. Kovalev, “Problemy regiona nakanune IV Kaspiyskogo sammita,” Prob-lemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, No. 2, 2014, pp. 31-69.

See: I. Pop, “China’s Energy Strategy in Central Asia: Interaction with Russia, India and Japan,” UNISCI Discussion Papers, No. 24, 2010, pp. 200-205.

See: S. Peyrouse, Turkmenistan: Strategies of Power, Dilemmas of Development, Routledge, 2015. 264 pp.

See: Z.A. Dadabaeva, E.M. Kuzmina, Protsessy regionalizatsii v Tsentralnoy Azii: problemy i protivorechia, Institute of Economics, RAS, Moscow, 2014, p. 33.

See: E. Tianlie, “Rol Tsentralnoy Azii v energeticheskoy strategii Kitaia,” in: Tsentralnaia Asia: problemy i perspe-ktivy (vzgliad iz Rossii i Kitaia), Collection of articles, ed. by K.A. Kokarev, D.A. Alexandrov, I.Iu. Frolova, Russian Institute of Strategic Studies; Chinese Academy of Contemporary International Relations, Moscow, 2013, p. 145.

See: I.S. Zonn, Kaspiy: illiuzii i realnost, Korkis, Moscow, 1999, 467 pp.

See: M.P. Amineh, “Impact of the Caspian Energy Supply on the Global Market,” Atlantisch Perspectief, Vol. 27,No. 7/8, 2003, pp. 27-33.

See: T. Dadabaev, “‘Silk Road’ as Foreign Policy Discourse: The Construction of Chinese, Japanese and Korean Engagement Strategies in Central Asia,” Journal of Eurasian Studies, No. 1, 2018, pp. 30-41.

See: Z.A. Dadabaeva, E.M. Kuzmina, op. cit.

See: B. Grif¿th, “Back Yard Politics: Russia’s Foreign Policy Toward the Caspian Basin,” The Journal of Post-So-viet Democratization, Vol. 6, 1998, pp. 426-441.

See: Lu Shanbing, Huang Mengfang, Lu Naxi, Sopriazhenie stroitelstva EPShP i EAES: problemy uglublenia eko-nomicheskogo sotrudnichestva mezhdu Kitaem, Rossiey i gosudarstvami Tsentralnoy Azii, RISI, Moscow, 2016, pp. 119-135.

See: T.S. Guzenkova, N.V. Karpov, D.A. Alexandrov, Ia.A. Amelina, I.V. Ippolitov, V.B. Kashirin, A.I. Kucheren-kov, D.S. Popov, A.N. Sytin, K.I. Tasits, S.V. Tikhonova, Strany SNG i Baltii v globalnoy politike Kitaia, RISI, Moscow, 2013,p. 40.

See: A. Muminov, “Evropa zhdet gaz iz kazakhstana,” Kapital, 1 March, 2018, p. 10.

See: R. Sokolsky, T. Charlick-Paley, “Caspian Oil and Energy Security,” in: NATO and Caspian Security: A Mission Too Far? RAND Corporation, 1999, pp. 69-80.

See: D. Bolekbaeva, I.F. Selivanova, op. cit.

See: M. Elemesov, “Kazakhstan s 2017 goda planiruet eksportirovat gaz v Kitay,” Liter (Kazakhstan), 20 February,2017.

See: N.A. Nazarbayev, Era nezavisimosti, KAZaknarat, Almaty, 2017, p. 467.

See: S. Zhiltsov, A. Bimenova, “Central Asian Politics Regarding Water Use of Transboundary Rivers,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 16, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 78-87.

See: M.L. Pikulina, “Problema transgranichnykh vodnykh resursov v Tsentralnoy Azii,” Kazakhstann-Spektr, No. 1,2013, pp. 31-42.

See: M. Gliants, “Kitayskaia initsiativa ‘odin poias—odin put’: chto mozhet sdelat ‘brand’,” Problemy postsovetsk-ogo prostranstva, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2017, pp. 8-19.

See: N.K. Kipshakbaev, “Vodnomu sotrudnichestvu stran Tsentralnoy Azii—20 let: opyt proshlogo i problemy bu-dushchego,” Vodnoe khoziaystvo Kazakhstana, No. 2 (52), 2013, pp. 15-20.

See: R. Manning , “The Myth of the Caspian Great Game and the ‘New Persian Gulf’,” The Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. VII, 2000, pp. 15-33.

See: F. Umbach, S. Raszewski, “Strategic Perspectives for Bilateral Energy Cooperation between the EU and Ka-zakhstan Geo-Economic and Geopolitical Dimensions in Competition with Russia and China’s Central Asia Policies,” Kon-rad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 2016, 70 pp.

See: A. Cohen, “Caspian Gas, TANAP and TAP in Europe’s Energy Security,” Istituto Affari Internazionali—IAI Working Papers, 14 April, 2014, 17 pp.

See: Kh.M. Mukhabbatov, “Vodnye problemy Tadzhikistana i problemy vodopolzovania v Tsentralnoy Azii,” Prob-lemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, No. 3, 2016, pp. 29-45.

See: B. Auelbaev, T. Erzhanov, “Politika stran Tsentralnoy Azii i vodno-energeticheskie problemy regiona,” Ana-lytic (Kazakhstan), No. 3, 2009, pp. 13-18.

See: B.R. Syrlybaeva, “Upravlenie vodnymi resursami kak faktor obespechenia bezopasnosti Tsentralnoaziatskogo regiona,” in: Aktualnye problemy bezopasnosti i sotrudnichestva v Kaspiysko-Tsentralnoaziatskom regione: materialy XI Ezhegodnoy Almatinskoy konferentsii (g. Almaty, 20 iunia 2013 g.), KISI, Almaty, 2013, pp. 119-148.

See: N.A. Nazarbayev, “V vodnom voprose ne dolzhno byt politicheskogo torga,” available at [http://www.inform.

z/ru/v-vodnom-voprose-ne-dolzhno-byt-politicheskogo-torga-nursultan-nazarbaev_a3185780], 17 March, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Section

REGIONAL POLICY

How to Cite

ZHILTSOV, S., PARKHOMCHIK, L., SLISOVSKIY, D., & MEDVEDEV, N. (2018). CENTRAL ASIA TODAY: A NEW WAVE OF WATER AND ENERGY COOPERATION AND PIPELINE ARCHITECTURE. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 19(2), 18-28. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1433

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1077

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>