THE PARTY SYSTEM AS AN ELEMENT OF POLITICAL MODERNIZATION OF KAZAKHSTAN
Keywords:
party, the party system of Kazakhstan, modernization, identity, transformation of the political system, the state.Abstract
Today, sovereign Kazakhstan is steadily moving towards consistent modernization, higher competitiveness in the globalized world, and postindustrial development. Its political party system can be described as a political institution that ensures the country’s stability and sustainability. A multi-party system and pluralism that should be developed and consolidated are the two indispensable elements of democratization. Despite their fundamental transformations, political parties and political systems have not disappeared from the stage—they have merely moved to qualitatively new positions. At each new stage of social and political transformation, political parties undergo radical changes; the same fully applies to the party system in its quantitative and qualitative dimensions. Political parties of Kazakhstan have traveled the road from Proto parties to industrialized entities to self-organizing mechanisms of the political elites. In order to clarify the prospects and the key trends of the country’s political modernization, we should identify the specifics of Kazakhstan’s party system and the nature of its impact on the state and civil society.
Downloads
References
Politichesky protsess: osnovnye aspekty i sposoby analiza, Collection of education materials, ed. by E.Iu. Meleshkina,INFRA-M Publishing House, Moscow, 2001, p. 248.
See: S.N. Eisenstadt, Modernization: Protest and Change, New York, 1966.
S. Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, Yale University Press, 1968, p. 35.
W. Zapf, “Teoria modernizatsii i razlichie putey obshchestvennogo razvitia,” Sotsis, No. 8, 1998, p. 14.
See: V.A. Krasilshchikov, V dogonku za proshedshim vekom: razvitie Rossii v XX veke s tochki zrenia mirovykh modernizatsiy, ROSSPEN, Moscow, 1998—Rossiyskaia Gosudarstvennaia biblioteka, 2010, pp. 12-13.
M.S. Ashimbayev, Politichesky tranzit: ot globalnogo k natsionalnomu izmereniu, Elorda, Astana, 2002, p. 14.
See: V.I. Pantin, V.V. Lapkin, “Volny politicheskoy modernizatsii v istorii Rossii,” Polis, No. 2, 1998, p. 40.
V.A. Krasilshchikov, “Evoliutsia teorii modernizatsii,” in: Modernizatsia: mirovoy opyt i sovremenny Kazakhstan.
aterialy respublikanskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 20-21 aprelia 1995 g., Part 1, Turan Independent University,Almaty, 1995, p. 22.
See: Politichesky protsess: osnovnye aspekty i sposoby analiza, p. 249.
N.A. Nazarbayev, Na poroge XXI veka, Өner, Almaty, 1996, pp. 125-128.
See: N.A. Nazarbayev, “Ideynaia konsolidatsia obshchestva kak uslovie progressa Kazakhstana,” in: Strategia neza-visimosti, Almaty, 2003, pp. 84-120.
M.S. Ashimbayev, op. cit., p. 17.
Zh.Kh. Junusova, Institutsionalizatsia demokratii: model zapadnoy politologii dlia posttotalitarnykh obshchestv i opyt Respubliki Kazakhstan, Author’s thesis of a doctorate, Almaty, 1996, p. 147.
K.L. Syroezhkin, “Gosudarstvennost i etnichnost: problemy i prioritety perekhodnykh obshchestv,” in: Kazakhstan na puti k ustoychivomu razvitiu, Almaty, 1996, p. 143.
A. Migranian, “Perestroyka kak popytka transformatsii totalitarnoy imperii,” in: A. Migranian, Rossia v poiskakh identichnosti (1985-1995), Collection or articles and essays, Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, Moscow, 1997, p. 197.
See: A.Kh. Bizhanov, “Gosudarstvo i politicheskie partii: istoria i sovremennost,” in: Gosudarstvo i politicheskie partii: istoria i sovremennost: Materialy respublikanskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Almaty, 27 aprelia 1998 g.,PNEK, KISI, Almaty,1998, pp. 20-21.
G.V. Golosov, “Formaty partiynykh system v novykh demokratiakh: institutsionalnye faktory neustoichivosti i frag-mentatsii,” Polis, No. 1, 1998, p. 106.
A.Kh. Bizhanov, Respublika Kazakhstan: demokraticheskaia modernizatsia obshchestva perekhodnogo perioda,Oner, Alamaty, 1997, p. 78.
See: E.K. Ertysbaev, Kazakhstan i Nazarbayev: logika peremen, Elorda, Astana, 2001, p. 576.
S.E. Zaslavsky, “Funktsii politicheskikh party v rossiyskom obshchestve,” in: Rossia i sovremenny mir, Collection,ed. by L.K. Shkarenkov, INION RAN, Moscow, 1998, pp. 135-136.
E.T. Seylekhanov, Politicheskaia sistema Respubliki Kazakhstan: opyt razvitia i perspektivy, Monograph, KISI under the President of the RK, Almaty, 2009, p. 186.
See: I. Karsakov, “Politicheskie partii Rossii i Kazakhstana: sravnitelny analiz,” Sayasat, No. 5, 1995, pp. 25-26.
See: I.N. Tasmagambetov, Sotsialnaia politika i politicheskaia transformatsia, Institute of Development of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 1997, pp. 163-200.
M. Duverger, Politicheskie partii, Transl. from the French, Akademichesky proekt, Moscow, 2000, p. 455.
See: H.E. Hale, Why Not Parties in Russia?: Democracy, Federalism, and the State, Cambridge University Press,New York, 2007, p. 4.
Ibidem.
See: A. Peruashev, Institutsializatsia politicheskoy partii v sovremennom Kazakhstane. Opyt GPK, Strategia Analytical Center, Almaty, 2002, pp. 21-22.
See: B. Abdygaliev, “Politicheskie partii i obshchestvennye organizatsii Kazakhstana,” in: Demokratizatsia ob-shchestva—magistralny put razvitia Kazakhstana, Collection of Documents of the Republican Scienti¿c and Practical Confer-ence, Almaty, 10 October, 1995, KISI at the President of the RK, Almaty, 1995, pp. 81-82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.