Disclosure of Research and Development information of Thai’ s MAI listed Companies during the application of the Thailand 4.0 model
Keywords:
Research Disclosure, Development Disclosure, MAI Listed Companies, Financial PerformanceAbstract
This work aims to examine relationship and effect of R&D Disclosure along with firm characteristics on financial performance (Return on Asset – ROA) of SME in Thailand Market for Alternative Investment (MAI) in the early phase of Thailand 4.0 model implementation. Descriptive statistical analysis and text unit counting are used to collect R&D Disclosure data from 128 sample companies’ annual reports between 2016 and 2018. MRA is used to test effect and relationship. The study shows that first, R&D Disclosure has been on the rise in the past three years but there is no conclusive evidence of R&D Disclosure’s direct effect on financial performance. Second, development closure has negative effect from development disclosure, firm age, leverage (debt to equity ratio: DER), and growth rate on financial performance. Third, there is positive effect from Development Disclosure, along with CEO Age, and business sector (S-Curve group). Fourth, effect of research disclosure on financial performance cannot be concluded. Finally, the TAS No. 38: Intangible Asset contributes to R&D Disclosure in the 56-1 report.
Downloads
References
Al-Delawi, A.S. and W.M. Ramo, The Impact of Accounting Information system on Performance Management. Polish Journal of Management studies, 21(2), 36-48. 2020.DOI: https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.2.03.
Shen, K.-Y., M.-R. Yan, and G.-H. Tzeng, Exploring R&D influences on financial performance for business sustainability considering dual profitability objectives. Sustainability, 2017. 9(11): p. 1964.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111964.
Glaeser, S., J. Michels, and R.E. Verrecchia, Discretionary disclosure and manager horizon: Evidence from patenting. Review of Accounting Studies, 2020. 25(2): p. 597-635.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-019-09520-0.
Yan, M.R., Strategic product innovations and dynamic pricing models in oligopolistic market. J. Sci. Ind. Res., 2017(76), 284-288. 2017.
Saengchamnong, M. and B. Viroonratch, An Automotive Part Management Methods of Plant Managers in Managing Thai-Oversea Manufacturing Parts: A Case Study of Effectiveness and Efficiency of Organizational Instruction Management. Journal of Multidisciplinary in Social Sciences, 16(1), 48-54. . 2019.
Tellis, G.J., J.C. Prabhu, and R.K. Chandy, Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of marketing, 2009. 73(1): p. 3-23.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.003.
Pensute, C., Thailand 4.0 Economics and Political Contexts. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 8(1), 67-99. 2017.
Hottenrott, H. and C. Lopes‐Bento, R&D partnerships and innovation performance: Can there be too much of a good thing? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2016. 33(6): p. 773-794.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12311.
Nekhili, M., et al., R&D narrative disclosure, corporate governance and market value: Evidence from France. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 2016. 32(1): p. 111-128.DOI: https://doi.org/10.31397/seeij.v2i1.15.
Al-Sartawi, A.M. and S. Reyad, Signaling theory and the determinants of online financial disclosure. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 34(3), 237-247. , 2018.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-10-2017-0103.
Masum, A.K.M., et al. Abstractive method of text summarization with sequence to sequence RNNs. IEEE.
Parker, D.W., et al., Agency theory perspective on public-private-partnerships: International development project. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2018.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-09-2016-0191.
Suttipun, M., et al., Relationship between competency as per the international education standards for accounting professionals and the awareness and understanding of the Thai financial reporting standards for small and medium sized enterprises: A case study of accounting professionals in Thailand's southern region. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 2018. 39(3): p. 432-438.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.013.
Enache, L. and K. Hussainey, The substitutive relation between voluntary disclosure and corporate governance in their effects on firm performance. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2020. 54(2): p. 413-445.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00794-8.
Dao, T.L. and T.D. Nguyen, Controlling the COVID-19 pandemic: Useful lessons from Vietnam. Travel medicine and infectious disease, 2020. 37: p. 101822.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101822.
Boujelbene, Y. and R. Guidara, Determinants of R&D (Research and Development) disclosure in France. International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, 8(3/4), 270. . 2016.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMFA.2016.10002755.
Jaggi, B., et al., The factors motivating voluntary disclosure of carbon information: Evidence based on Italian listed companies. Organization & Environment, 2018. 31(2): p. 178-202.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026617705282.
Phuong, N.T. and P.T. Manh, The relationship between Research and development (R&D) spending and Firm’s financial performance: Case study of listed firms on Vietnam Stock Exchange. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2017. 3(8): p. 7-13.
Bobenic, A.H. and K. Zuzana, The effect of the degree of foreign ownership on firms' performance. Review of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 29-44. . 2016.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2016- 0003.
Crespo, S.C., et al., The environmental information report in the annual accounts: An analysis of the main ports in Spain. Harvard Deusto Business Research, VIII(3), 219-228. . 2019.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/hdbr.233.
Panyagometh, K., The effects of pandemic event on the stock exchange of Thailand. Economies, 2020. 8(4): p. 90.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8040090.
Agyei-Mensah, B.K., IAS-38 disclosure compliance and corporate governance: evidence from an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3), 419-437. , 2019.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-12-2017-0293.
Dang, C., Z.F. Li, and C. Yang, Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of banking & finance, 2018. 86: p. 159-176.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006.
Tassabehji, R., J.L. Mishra, and C. Dominguez-Péry, Knowledge sharing for innovation performance improvement in micro/SMEs: an insight from the creative sector. Production Planning & Control, 2019. 30(10-12): p. 935-950.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1582101.
Coad, A., A. Segarra, and M. Teruel, Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role? Research policy, 2016. 45(2): p. 387-400.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015.
Rostami, N., M.M. Khyareh, and R. Mazhari, Competitiveness, entrepreneurship, and economic performance: Evidence from factor-, efficiency-, and innovation-driven countries. Economic Annals, 2019. 64(221): p. 33-64.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/EKA1921033R.
Choi, C. and M.H. Yi, The Internet, R&D expenditure and economic growth. Applied Economics Letters, 2018. 25(4): p. 264-267.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1316819.
Fosu, S., et al., Information asymmetry, leverage and firm value: Do crisis and growth matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 2016. 46: p. 140-150.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.05.002.
Chaudhuri, K., S.C. Kumbhakar, and L. Sundaram, Estimation of firm performance from a MIMIC model. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016. 255(1): p. 298-307.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.005.
Coluccia, D., et al., R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective. Journal of Business Research, 2020. 119: p. 259-271.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.015.
Dyduch, J. and J. Krasodomska, Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An empirical study of Polish listed companies. Sustainability, 2017. 9(11): p. 1934.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9111934.
Wang, Y.A., A.V and E. Turkina, Antecedents of SME embeddedness in inter-organizational networks: Evidence from China's aerospace industry. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 1-24. . 2017.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2017.1391368.
Gambacorta, L. and S. Karmakar, Leverage and risk weighted capital requirements, vol 21, 195-210. . 2016.
Koh, P.-S., D.M. Reeb, and W. Zhao, CEO confidence and unreported R&D. Management Science, 2018. 64(12): p. 5725-5747.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2809.
Lucia, L. and R.R. Panggabean, The effect of firm's characteristic and corporate governance to sustainability report disclosure. SEEIJ (Social Economics and Ecology International Journal), 2018. 2(1): p. 18-28.DOI: https://doi.org/10.31397/seeij.v2i1.15.
Bennedsen, M., F. Pérez‐González, and D. Wolfenzon, Do CEOs matter? Evidence from hospitalization events. The Journal of Finance, 2020. 75(4): p. 1877-1911.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12897.
Carini, C., et al., Ex-ante impact assessment of sustainability information–the directive 2014/95. Sustainability, 2018. 10(2): p. 560.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020560.
Suwansin, N., et al, Risk Disclosure: A Comparative Study of Companies Listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) and the Market for Alternative Investment (mai) and its Relationship with Cost of Debt. Hatyai Academic Journal, 16(2), 153-170. 2019.
Lewis, C. and S. Young, Fad or future? Automated analysis of financial text and its implications for corporate reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 2019. 49(5): p. 587-615.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1611730.
Bischoff, C.S. and F.J. Christiansen, Political parties and innovation. Public Management Review, 2017. 19(1): p. 74-89.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200664.
Lopes, I.T. and D.P. Ferraz, The value of intangibles and diversity on boards looking towards economic future returns: evidence from non-financial Iberian business organisations. International Journal of Business Excellence, 2016. 10(3): p. 392-417.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2016.078705.
Callaghan, C.W., Disaster management, crowdsourced R&D and probabilistic innovation theory: Toward real time disaster response capability. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2016. 17: p. 238-250.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.05.004.
Cucculelli, M., Firm age and the probability of product innovation. Do CEO tenure and product tenure matter? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2018. 28(1): p. 153-179.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-017-0542-4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
