FOREIGN POLICY OF THE SOUTH CAUCASIAN COUNTRIES: RESULTS AND NEW CHALLENGES
Keywords:
Southern Caucasus, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, non-regional states.Abstract
The newly independent states (South Caucasian countries being no exception), the products of the Soviet Union’s traumatic disintegration, needed independent foreign policies. Throughout the three decades of their independence they formulated their priorities and defined approaches and principles under the strong pressure of certain factors.
This process has been unfolding amid the complicated social and political processes and geopolitical transformations in the region shaken by the post-Soviet ethnic conflicts. As could be expected, the newly independent South Caucasian states opted for different routes in their economic and statehood development, while their ruling elites took into account the external and internal contexts when shaping their foreign policies. Different approaches and different foreign policy priorities opened the doors to non- regional geopolitical actors: the United States, the European Union, Iran and Turkey have joined Russia, whose presence is rooted in its past. Recently, China, Israel and Japan have become interested in the region. Thus, today the regional countries are orientated to the interests of non-regional states. This has not benefited the situation in the region or cooperation among the regional states.
Foreign policy of the South Caucasian countries is inseparable from the regional security problems, which means that it should become an object of meticulous studies. In the latter half of 2020, the war in Nagorno- Karabakh changed the region’s geopolitical setting and shattered its stability.
The article sums up the results of the policies pursued by the South Caucasian countries and identifies the challenges and possible developments in the region after the Karabakh war of 2020.
Downloads
References
See: Mify i konflikty na Iuzhnom Kavkaze, Vol. 2, Instrumentalizatsia temy konflikta v politicheskom diskurse, InternationalAlert, 2013, p. 14.
See: D. Degterev et al., “Parametry mnogovektornosti vneshney politiki stran SNG. Prikladnoy analiz,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2018, pp. 63-65.
See: H. Mikaelian, “Armenian Foreign Policy: Coordinating the Interests of the U.S., the EU, and Russia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 3 (57), 2009, pp. 116-124.
The term was put into circulation by Vartan Oskanian, Foreign Minister of Armenia in 1998.
See: “Vneshnepoliticheskiy vybor Armenii: politika obespechenia maksimalnoy bezopasnosti,” Problemy post-sovetskogo prostranstva, No. 3, 2015, p. 99.
See: L. Ter-Petrosian, Selected Speeches, Articles, Interviews, Archives of the First President of Armenia, Erevan, 2006, p. 136 (in Armenian).
See: J. Manukian, “Politika Turtsii na Iuzhnom Kavkaze i problemy bezopasnosti Respubliki Armenia 1991-2007gg.,” in: Vneshniaia politika respubliki Armenia. Problemy i vyzovy. Nauchno-prakticheskaia konferentsia, posviashchennaia 22-letiu nezavisimosti RA, 17 oktiabria 2013 goda, EGU, Erevan, 2014, p. 94.
A. Terzyan, “Material Forces vs. the Force of Ideas: What Makes Russia Armenia’s ‘Best Friend’?” Armenian Journal of Political Science, No. 1 (8), 2018, p. 13.
See: S. Minasian, “Vneshniaia politika postsovetskoy Armenii: 20 let odnovremenno na neskolkikh stuliakh,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, No. 1, 2013, p. 85.
See: Z. Shiriyev, “Azerbaijan’s Relations with Russia: Closer by Default?” Russia and Eurasia Programme, Chatham House, March 2019, p. 4, available at [https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2019-03-14-Azerbaijan2.pdf], 1 June, 2021.
See: Z. Bakhturidze, Vneshniaia politika Gruzii 1991-2014 gg: kliuchevye orientiry i partnery, St. Petersburg, Avrora, 2015, p. 19.
See: H. Mikaelian, op. cit., p. 117.
See: Z. Bakhturidze, op. cit., pp. 25-26.
See: Z.Z. Bakhturidze, Vneshnepoliticheskiy kurs Gruzii v XXI veke: regionalnoe izmerenie, Publishing House of the Politechnical University, St. Petersburg, 2018, p. 30.
A. Terzyan, “The Evolution of Armenia’s Foreign Policy Identity: The Conception of Identity Driven Paths. Friends and Foes in Armenian Foreign Policy Discourse,” The Role of Identity, Norms and Beliefs in Foreign Policy of Armenia and Georgia, October 2016, p. 149.
L. Ter-Petrosian was convinced that “collective memory” of Armenian genocide of 1915 would negatively a his country’s foreign policy.
This means that the country should be involved in regional and world integration processes well-coordinated with its domestic and foreign policy.
See: “Council of Europe. Bilateral and Multilateral Relations,” Ministry of Foreign A nia, available at [https://www.mfa.am/en/international-organisations/5],10 June, 2021.
See: Republic of Armenia. National Security Strategy, 2007, available at [https://www.mfa.am/filemanager/Statics/ Doctrinerus.pdf], 10 June, 2021.
A. Terzyan, The Evolution of Armenia’s Foreign Policy Identity: The Conception of Identity Driven Paths. Friends and Foes in Armenian Foreign Policy Discourse, p. 153.
See: S. Minasian, “V kontekste problem regionalnoy bezopasnosti”, Voenno-promyshlenny kuryer, No. 20 (87), 8 June, 2005, available at [https://vpk news.ru/articles/1414%20], 12 June, 2021.
See: G. Grigorian, “Torgovo-ekonomicheskie otnoshenia mezhdu Armeniey i Rossiey (1991-2016),” Rossia i novye gosudarstva Evrazii, No. 2, 2017, p. 57.
See: Statistical Yearbook of Armenia 2009, Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia, available in Russian at [https://armstat.am/ru/?nid=586&year=2009], 1 July, 2021.
Ibidem.
Ibidem.
See: “Iran. Bilateral Relations,” Foreign Ministry of the Republic of Armenia, available at [https://www.mfa.am/hy/ bilateral-relations/ir], 15 June, 2021.
See: S. Minasian, “Armenia and Georgia: Problems and Prospects,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 13, Issue 2, 2012, p. 47.
See: Statistical Yearbooks of Armenia, Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia, available at [https://armstat. am/en/?nid=586], 1 June, 2021.
See: S. Minasian, “Armenia and Georgia: Problems and Prospects,” pp. 46-47.
See: The Parliament of Armenia ratified this agreement on 11 April, 2018. In March 2021, it entered into force (see [https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_782], 21 June, 2021).
See: Annual Reports of the Foreign Ministry, Foreign Ministry of the Republic of Armenia, available at [https://www. mfa.am/hy/mfa-annual-report/], 21 June, 2021 (in Armenian).
A. Terzyan, The Evolution of Armenia’s Foreign Policy Identity: The Conception of Identity Driven Paths. Friends and Foes in Armenian Foreign Policy Discourse, p. 158.
See: Protocol No. 5 between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia on changes in the treaty between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia on the Russian military base in the territory of the Republic of Armenia of 16 March 1995, RF Foreign Ministry, available in Russian at [https://www.mid.ru/foreign_policy/international_contracts/2_ contract/-/storage-viewer/bilateral/page-7/45120 _storageviewer_WAR_storageviewerportlet_advancedSearch=false&_storageviewer_WAR_storageviewerportlet_keywords=%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F&_storageviewer_WAR_storageviewerportlet_fromPage=search&_storageviewer_WAR_storageviewerportlet_ andOperator=1], 18 June, 2021.
P. Wezeman, A. Kuimova, S. Wezeman, “Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2020,” SIPRI Fact Sheet, March 2021, p. 11, available at [https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/fs_2103_at_2020_v2.pdf], 25 June, 2021.
See: Armenia and Iran exchange gas for electricity.
See: External Trade Database, Statistical Committee of the Republic of Armenia, available at [https://ec.europa.eu/ commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_782], 1 June, 2021.
Republic of Armenia. National Security Strategy, July 2020, available at [https://www.primeminister.am/u_files/file/ Di 2 July, 2021 (in Armenian).
B. Poghosyan, “Political and Economic Context of Armenian Membership in the Eurasian Economic Union,” in: Armenia’s Precarious Balance: The European Union (EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2020, p. 17.
See: “Aram Safarian: Armiano-rossiyskoe voenno-politicheskoe i voenno-tekhnicheskoe sotrudnichestvo nakhoditsia na samom vysokom urovne,” Иносми.РУ, 9 July, 2021, available at [https://inosmi.ru/politic/20210709/250080882.html], 12 July, 2021.
See: E. Markova, “Otnoshenia SShA i Azerbaidzhana v Kaspiyskom regione (90-e gody XX veka),” Problemy post- sovetskogo prostranstva, No. 8 (2), 2021, p. 289.
See: S. Zhiltsov, “Energy Flows in Central Asia and the Caspian Region: New Opportunities and New Challenges,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 15, Issue 4, 2014, p. 73.
See: A. Valiyev, “Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy: What Role for the West in the South Caucasus,” Working Paper Series— Eastern Voices: Europe’s East Faces an Unsettled West, Center for Transatlantic Relations, March 2017, p. 139.
See: S. Markedonov, “Rossia-Azerbaidzhan: protivorechivoe partnerstvo,” RSMD, 1 November, 2013, available at [https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/rossiya-azerbaydzhan-protivorechivoe-partnerstvo/], 5 July, 2021.
See: A. Nasibova, “Ot A. Mutalibova k G. Aliyevu: formirovanie vneshney politiki nezavisimogo Azerbaijana,” Is- toria. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2019, p. 85.
Ibidem.
See: V. Avatkov, “Osnovy vneshnepoliticheskogo kursa Azerbaidzhanskoy Respubliki na sovremennom etape,” Kontury globalnykh transformatsiy, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2020, p. 126.
See: Azərbaycan Respublikasının milli təhlükəsizlik konsepsiyası, 23 May, 2007 (National Security Conception of the Azerbaijan Republic, 23 May, 2007), available at [https://migration.gov.az/content/pdf/a959238a0eb184bcc3b26feb9c0cdec1. pdf], 5 July, 2021 (in Azeri).
See: I. Fedorovskaia, “Azerbaidzhan i Evrosoiuz: zigzagi otnosheniy,” Rossia i novye gosudartsva Evrazii, No. 1, 2015, p. 99.
See: S. Cornell, Azerbaijan since Independence, London, 2011, p. 412.
See: A. Areshev, “Amerikano-Azerbaidzhanskoe sotrudnichestvo: ‘Melkaia riab’ i regionalny kontekst,” Noev kovcheg, No. 17 (247), 2014, available at [https://noev-kovcheg.ru/mag/2014-17/4710.html], 27 June, 2021).
See: L. Aleksanyan, Gruzia vo vneshney politike Turtsii na sovremennom etape, PhD thesis, 23.00.04, Moscow, 2019, p. 24.
See: “The Foreign Trade of Azerbaijan,” The State Statistical Committee of the Republic of Azerbaijan, available at
[https://www.stat.gov.az/source/trade/?lang=en], 5 July, 2021.
See: E. Kuklina, “Energeticheskiy vektor rossiysko-azerbaidzhanskogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva v tsifrovom prostranstve sovremennogo mira, Eurasian Integration: Economics, Law, Politics, 2019, p. 54.
See: A. Nasibova, “Stanovlenie i razvitie azerbaidzhano-turetskikh otnosheniy (1990-2010 gg.),” PhD thesis, Saratov, 2020. p. 96.
See: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti ile Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti arasında stratejik oratklık ve karşılıklı yardım anlaşması (Agreement on Strategic Partnership and Mutual Support between the Turkish Republic and the Azerbaijan Republic), available at [http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem23/yil01/ss645.pdf], 1 June, 2021 (in Turkish).
See: “Turtsia i Azerbaidzhan reshili sozdat sovmestnuiu Tiurkskuiu armiu,” RBK, 28 July, 2021, available at [https:// www.rbc.ru/politics/28/07/2021/610111d89a794702833cd138], 1 July, 2021.
See: S. Zhiltsov, L. Alexanian, S. Gavrilova, E. Markova, “China in the Southern Caucasus,” Central Asia and the Caucasus. English Edition, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 2019, pp. 7-23.
See: Istanbul Document 1999-OSCE, Istanbul, 1999, p. 281, available at [https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/6/5/39569.pdf], 12 July, 2021.
See: A. Ayvazian, “Gruzia: vneshniaia politika malogo gosudarstva,” Sovremennaia Evropa, No. 1, 2020, p. 87.
See: D. Leushkin, D. Sukhiashvili, “Evoliutsia i osnovnye etapy otnosheniy Gruzii i NATO,” Vestnik Nizhegorodsk- ogo universiteta imeni N.I. Lobachevskogo, No. 1, 2019, p. 39.
See: National Security Concept of Georgia (2005), available in full at [https://mod.gov.ge/uploads/2018/pdf/NSC- ENG.pdf], 12 July, 2021; Foreign Policy Strategy 2006-2009, Foreign Ministry, available at [https://www.gfsis.org/media/ download/GSAC/resources/115_1973_997704_Strategy_MFA2006-2009En.pdf P. 9—10.], 12 July, 2021.
N. MacFarlane, “The Reluctant Patron: Georgia-US relations,” in: Georgian Foreign Policy: The Quest for Sustainable Security. Ed. by K. Kakachia and M. Cecire, Tbilisi, 2013. P. 88.
See: National Security Concept of Georgia, 2011, available at [https://mod.gov.ge/uploads/2018/pdf/NSC-ENG.pdf], 12 July, 2021.
See: L. Aleksanyan, op. cit., p. 96.
See: National Statistics Oßce of Georgia. External Trade, available at [https://www.geostat.ge/en/modules/categories/35/external-trade], 15 July, 2021.
Ibidem.
See: Resolution on Basic Directions of Georgia’s Foreign Policy, 2013, available at [https://www.clingendael.org/ sites/default/files/2016 02/Parlementsresolutie%20Georgie.pdf], 15 July, 2021.
Government Program. Georgia, May 2015, available at [http://gov.ge/files/50258_50258_105367_15.07.17-May7, 2015 ForStrong,Democratic,andUnifiedGeorgia-GovernmentofGeorgiaProgram.pdf], 11 July, 2021.
See: J. Melikyan, “Georgia’s Foreign Policy After the October 2012 Parliamentary Elections,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2014, p. 72.
See: National Statistics Oßce of Georgia. External Trade.
See: O. Karpovich, O. Shakirov, “Rossia i Gruzia: Vremia vzaimodeystvovat,” Problemy postsovetskogo prostrans- tva, No. 8 (1), 2021, p. 27.
See: A. Ayvasian op. cit., p. 85.
See: National Statistics Oßce of Georgia. External Trade.
Relations with Georgia. NATO, available at [https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_38988.htm], 15 July, 2021.
See: S. Zhiltsov, L. Alexanian, S. Gavrilova, E. Markova, op. cit., p. 23.
See: “Priniali po-sosedski: Gruzia obnovila druzhbu s Armeniey i Azerbaidzhanom”, Izvestia, 16 May, 2021, available at [https://iz.ru/1164283/kseniia-loginova/priniali-po-sosedski-gruziia-obnovila-druzhbu-s-armeniei-i-azerbaidzhanom], 16 May, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
