ACCULTURATION OF ARMENIANS IN RUSSIA: ROLE OF SOCIAL IDENTITIES AND DIASPORA ACTIVITY

Authors

  • Victoria GALYAPINA Ph.D. (Psychol.), Associate Professor, Leading Research Fellow, Center for Sociocultural Research; Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Oksana TUCHINA D.Sc. (Psychol.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Kuban State Technological University (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) Author
  • Ivan Gumilar Sambas APOLLONOV D.Sc. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of History, Philosophy and Psychology, Kuban State Technological University (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) Author

Keywords:

acculturation, ethnic, regional, Russian national identity, diaspora activity, Armenians, Russia

Abstract

The Armenian diaspora is one of the largest in Russia and in the world. The Armenians living in the Krasnodar Territory are a large and active group, thus, an investigation into the problem of their acculturation is of scientific and practical importance. Based on the theory of social identity, the theory of acculturation, and the regional socio-cultural context, the study focused on the role of ethnic, regional and Russian national (civic) identities and diaspora activity in the acculturation of the Armenians in the Krasnodar Territory. The study used the scales from the MIRIPS project questionnaire (Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies). The sample consisted of 181 respondents. Using structural equation modeling, the ethnic and Russian national identities of the Armenians living in the Krasnodar Territory were revealed as factors that contributed to their integration, and regional identity—as factors that fostered assimilation. Diaspora activity was determined by both ethnic and regional identity and predicted the Armenians’ attitudes towards integration and separation. Also, diaspora activity of the Armenians in the Kuban region facilitated the interconnection of ethnic and regional identities with the separation strategy. In general, the study revealed that all identities (ethnic, regional and Russian national) contribute to a certain degree to the acceptance of the host society culture by the Armenians in the Krasnodar Territory. At the same time, diaspora activity can be an effective mechanism for the adaptation of migrants or a source of problems associated with increased impenetrability of diaspora’s borders, the migrants’ exclusive focus on their ethnic group and their decreased desire for sociocultural integration into the host society. It is important to take this into account when shaping the regional interethnic relations policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: R. Brubaker, “The ‘Diaspora’ Diaspora,” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1-19, available at [Doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000289997]; R. Cohen, Global Diasporas: An Introduction, University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1997, 240 pp., available at [Doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/591321].

See: V. Diatlov, “Armiane Rossii: diasporalnye strategii integratsii,” 21 Vek, Vol. 2, No. 6, 2007, pp. 60-70.

See: Armenia’s Diaspora—Its Role and Influence, Foreign & Commonwealth Office U.K. Report, 2014, available at [www.gov.uk/government/publications/armenias-diaspora-its-role-andinfluence].

See: O.B. Leontieva, L.G. Mkrtchian, “Armianskaia diaspora Rossii: sovremennye podkhody k izucheniu,” Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. Istoria, pedagogika,

See: E. Minasian, “O roli armianskoy diaspory v otnosheniiakh mezhdu Rossiyskoy Federatsiey i Respublikoy Armeniia: sotsialno-ekonomicheskie i kulturnye sviazi,” Chelovechesky kapital, Vol. 6, No. 138, 2020, pp. 29-37, available at [DOI: 10.25629/HC.2020.06.04].

See: O.B. Leontieva, L.G. Mkrtchian, op. cit.

See: A.S. Berberian, O.R. Tuchina, “Issledovanie natsionalnoy identichnosti i istoricheskogo opyta lichnosti v titulnom armianskom etnose i sopriazhennoy armianskoy diaspore v Rossii,” Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal, No. 2, 2018,

pp. 190-214.

See: A.V. Dmitriyev, V.V. Voronov, E.A. Mikhaylova, “Prognoznoe modelirovanie mezhetnicheskikh otnosheniy v rossiyskikh regionakh na osnove analiza identifikatsionnykh strategiy diaspornykh i zemliacheskikh grupp,” Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, No. 6, 2017, pp. 97-124, available at [DOI: 10.14515/moni- toring.2017.6.06].

See: H. Tajfel, J.C. Turner, “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior,” in: Psychology of Intergroup Relation, ed. by S. Worchel, W.G. Austin, Hall Publishers, Chicago, 1986, pp. 7-24.

See: B. Simon, S. Sturmer, K. Ste lective Identification in AIDS-Volunteerism,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 26, 2000, pp. 497-506.

See: M. Bilewicz, A. Wojcik, “Does Identification Predict Community Involvement? Exploring Consequences of Social Identification Among the Jewish Minority in Poland,” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 20, 2009, pp. 72-79, available at [DOI: 10.1002/casp.1012].

See: S. Martinez Damia, D. Marzana, S. Alfieri, M. Pozzi, E. Marta, M.L. Martinez, “Psychological and Structural Barriers to Immigrant Community Participation: The Experience of Peruvians in Santiago de Chile,” American Journal of Community Psychology, 2020, pp. 1-14, available at [https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12472].

G.P. Ferenchuk, “Armianskaia diaspora i kultura formirovania rossiyskoy identichnosti,” in: Armiane Iuga Rossii: istoria, kultura, obshchee budushchee. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, Rostov-on-Don, 2012, available at [https://armeniansite.ru/armyanskie-diaspory/82-armyanskaya-diaspora-i-kultura-formirovaniya-rossijskoj-identichnosti. html].

See: V.V. Konstantinov, M.V. Vershinina, “Vzaimosviaz etnicheskoy identichnosti migrantov-armian i usloviy ikh prozhivania v prinimaiushchem soobshchestve,” Psychological Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2014, pp. 71-79.

See: A.V. Dmitriyev, V.V. Voronov, E.A. Mikhaylova, op. cit.

See: J.W. Berry, J.S. Phinney, D.L. Sam, P. Vedder, “Immigrant Youth: Acculturation, Identity, and Adaptation,” Applied Psychology, Vol. 55, 2006, pp. 303-332; K. Liebkind, T.A.E. Mähönen, S.A. Varjonen, I. Jasinskaja-Lahti, “Acculturation and Identity,” in: Cambridge Handbook of Acculturation Psychology, ed. by D.L. Sam, J.W. Berry, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016, pp. 30-49, available at [Doi:10.1017/ CBO9781316219218.004].

See: J.W. Berry, Mutual Intercultural Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017.

See: J. Georgas, D. Papastylianou, “Acculturation and Ethnic Identity: The Remigration of Ethnic Greeks to Greece,” in: Key Issues in Cross-Cultural Psychology, ed. by H. Grad, A. Blanco, J. Georgas, Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, Netherlands, 1998, pp. 114-127; A. Portes, R.G. Rumbaut, Immigrant America: A Portrait, 3rd edition, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 2006.

See: T.A. Ryabichenko, N.M. Lebedeva, I.D. Plotka, “Mnozhestvennye identichnosti, akkulturatsiia i adaptatsiia russkikh v Latvii i Gruzii,” Kulturno-istoricheskaia psikhologia, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2019, pp. 54-64, available at [Doi: 10.17759/ chp.2019150206].

See: C. Ward, S. Fox, J. Wilson, J. Stuart, L. Kus, “Contextual Influences on Acculturation Processes: The Roles of Family, Community and Society,” Psychological Studies, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2010, pp. 26-34, available at [https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12646-010-0003-8].

See: V.V. Konstantinov, M.V. Babayeva, “Transformatsia etnicheskoy identichnosti migrantov-armian, vovlechennykh i ne vovlechennykh v deiatelnost natsionalno-kulturnoy avtonomii,” Vestnik RUDN, Series Psikhologia and Pedagogika, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2020, pp. 128-142, available at [DOI 10.22363/2313-1683-2020-17-1-128-142].

See: N.M. Lebedeva, A.N. Tatarko, Strategii mezhkulturnogo vzaimodeystvia migrantov i naselenia Rossii, Collection of scientific articles, RUDN, Moscow, 2009, pp. 10-63.

See: A.S. Berberian, O.R. Tuchina, op. cit.

See: V.V. Konstantinov, M.V. Vershinina, op. cit.; M. Bilewicz, A. Wojcik, op. cit.

See: J. Georgas, D. Papastylianou, op. cit.

See: T.A. Ryabichenko, N.M. Lebedeva, I.D. Plotka, op. cit.

See: V.V. Konstantinov, M.V. Babayeva, op. cit.

See: V.V. Konstantinov, M.V. Vershinina, op. cit.

See: Armenia’s Diaspora—Its Role and Influence.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-30

Issue

Section

ETHNIC RELATIONS AND MIGRATION

How to Cite

GALYAPINA, V., TUCHINA, O., & APOLLONOV, I. G. (2021). ACCULTURATION OF ARMENIANS IN RUSSIA: ROLE OF SOCIAL IDENTITIES AND DIASPORA ACTIVITY. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 22(4), 104-111. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/730

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 983

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.