ANALYSIS OF VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SYSTEM IN SUMEDANG REGENCY
Keywords:
system analysis, development planning, villageAbstract
ANALYSIS OF VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SYSTEM IN SUMEDANG REGENCY
Village development planning within the scientific scope of public administration is interesting to study. Village development planning is a public policy and an important instrument in village governance. This study aims to find out how the village development planning system in Sumedang Regency is, what factors need to be improved to increase effectiveness, find innovations and new concepts of village development planning in Sumedang Regency. The research method uses a qualitative deductive method. The research was carried out in 7 villages in Sumedang Regency with a theoretical approach [1].
The results of the study: 1) Village development planning is not integrated with district development planning, has met procedural and normative provisions but the substantive aspects are inadequate, 2) factors that need to be improved are human resource capabilities, planning integration through Bappeda involvement , readiness of supporting materials, reduction of government intervention and local governments, strengthening the substance and suitability of planning with regional needs and development, 3) new innovations: preparation of village development plans using information and communication technology, 4) new concepts: Effective village development planning is an integrated and community-based planning policy, inclusive and responsive to geospatial developments and advances in information and communication technology, b) Integrated village development planning with district development planning in the national development planning system.
Downloads
References
Ketchum, E.S., et al., Selective improvement in Seattle Heart Failure Model risk stratification using iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2012. 19(5): p. 1007- 1016.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9603-0.
Antlöv, H., A. Wetterberg, and L. Dharmawan, Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 2016. 52(2): p. 161-183.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047.
Digdowiseiso, K., E. Sugiyanto, and D. Zainul, Implementation of irrigation policy in the decentralized government: A case study of west Java, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 2018. 9(3 (27)): p. 411-422.DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.3(27).02.
Otley, D., Management control in contemporary organizations: towards a wider framework. Management accounting research, 1994. 5(3-4): p. 289-299.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1994.1018.
Beard, V.A. and A. Dasgupta, Collective action and community-driven development in rural and urban Indonesia. Urban studies, 2006. 43(9): p. 1451-1468.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600749944.
Rao, V. and A.M. Ibanez, The social impact of social funds in Jamaica: A ‘participatory econometric’analysis of targeting, collective action, and participation in community-driven development. Journal of Development Studies, 2005. 41(5): p. 788-838.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380500145297.
Afshar, F., Globalization: The persisting rural-urban question and the response of planning education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 1994. 13(4): p. 271-283.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X9401300404.
Ahmad, M.S. and N. Abu Talib, Decentralization and participatory rural development: A literature review. Contemporary Economics, 2011. 5(4): p. 58-67.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.28.
Ross, H., et al., Integrative analysis of city systems: Bangkok “Man and the Biosphere” programme study. Environment and Urbanization, 2000. 12(2): p. 151-161.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780001200212.
Usadolo, S.E. and M. Caldwel, A stakeholder approach to community participation in a rural development project. Sage Open, 2016. 6(1): p. 2158244016638132.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016638132.
Potts, R., et al., Exploring the usefulness of structural–functional approaches to analyse governance of planning systems. Planning theory, 2016. 15(2): p. 162-189.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095214553519.
Kyriacou, A.P. and O. Roca-Sagalés, Fiscal and political decentralization and government quality.Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2011. 29(2): p. 204-223.
Li, Y., A. Dang, and H. Cao. Planning analysis on metropolitan marginal area of Beijing along with its expansion. IEEE.
Kyriacou, A.P. and O. Roca-Sagalés, Fiscal decentralization and government quality in the OECD.Economics Letters, 2011. 111(3): p. 191-193.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/c1016r.
Heller, P., K.N. Harilal, and S. Chaudhuri, Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World development, 2007. 35(4): p. 626-648.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.07.001.
Han, L., et al. Research on planning management of the leisure and tourismoriented suburban villages based on system theory. EDP Sciences.
Huang, Y.F. Analysis on the Effect of Carrying out Village Planning—Case Study of HangMin Village. Trans Tech Publ.
Faludi, A., Towards a three-dimensional model of planning behaviour. Environment and Planning A, 1971. 3(3): p. 253-266.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a030253.
Frank, K.I. and S.A. Reiss, The rural planning perspective at an opportune time. Journal of Planning Literature, 2014. 29(4): p. 386-402.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412214542050.
Ghosh, M., Infrastructure and development in rural India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2017. 11(3): p. 256-289.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0973801017703499.
Caldwell, W.J. and J.A. Murray. Exploring Approaches to the Administration of a Long-Term Care Facility: The Application of a Community Planning and Development Process. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Curry, N., Sustainable rural development in England: Policy problems and equity consequences. Local Economy, 2012. 27(2): p. 95-102.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094211428864.
De Mello Jr, L.R., Fiscal decentralization and borrowing costs: the case of local governments. Public Finance Review, 2001. 29(2): p. 108-138.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109114210102900202.
Bray, D., Urban planning goes rural. Conceptualising the “New Village”. China Perspectives, 2013.2013(2013/3): p. 53-62.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6273.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
