Maxim Braterskiy, Professor at the State University-Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)

Five years ago I published an article in which I assessed the results of the first decade of Americas Central Asian policy. I came to the conclusion that between the early 1990s and 2002, it developed from mere recognition of the newly independent states to a long-term regional strategy. For obvious reasons, 9/11 served as the turning point: From a geographically remote, unstable and, in general, unexciting region, Central Asia became a zone of the U.S.s national security interests. After the 9/11 events, America began launching a wide-scale counterterrorist campaign in Asia. In the wake of 11 September, when the United States began its military operation in Afghanistan and set up military bases in Central Asia, the American military and politicians worked against the clock. Tactics, not strategy, was on everyones mind. The prospect of Americas regional involvement was still vague. It was later, in the mid-2000s, that Americas interests in the region were soberly assessed both in America and Russia. Today, when America, Russia, and China have outlined their interests in Central Asia in the context of its relative stability and when regional structures have appeared with good prospects (in particular the SCO), we can return to the problem of Americas policy in Central Asia and its prospects. The time has come to give a more objective and balanced assessment, to ascertain whether Central Asia remains high on the list of the U.S. foreign policy priorities, and to outline Russias response to Americas regional policy.

Today, three interconnected factors are responsible for the U.S.s interest in Central Asia: (1) its geopolitical status; (2) the insufficient political and economic stability of the local states and..

Please fill subscription form to obtain full text of this jounal

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
 - Advertorial UP - E-MAIL