An Examination of the Impacts of Conventional and Remote Work Environments on Employee Performance and Organisational Productivity.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9kxzc634Keywords:
Remote Work, Employee Performance, Corporate Productivity, Communication Challenges, InnovationAbstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate and contrast the impacts of conventional and remote work settings on the productivity and performance of all stakeholders, including individuals and organisations. The research was conducted to assess and compare the outcomes of both approaches. An investigation was conducted to ascertain the levels of similarity and dissimilarity between the two distinct types of operating environments. The study's goal was to look at the link between these three traits. Throughout the article endeavour, a quantitative analysis and a random sampling process were used. This was done to make sure that the data collected for the research was correct and appropriately reflected the population being studied. The study results provide a comparison between conventional and remote workplaces, focussing on major performance measures like productivity, job completion, and creative output. The study also looked at how traditional and remote workspaces affected the firm as a whole, looking at things like how much work was done and how well objectives were met. Working from home may provide several benefits, such as greater freedom, happier employees, and more productivity, as long as digital tools and management methods are utilised correctly. There are a lot of bad things about it, including the fact that people can't talk to each other or work together. This is one of the numerous things that it has. Regular office arrangements, on the other hand, were good since they let workers work together and were always watched. But these restrictions have rendered it tougher for individuals to strike a good balance between their occupation and private life. Because of this, it was difficult for individuals to show that they were autonomous and maintain their professional and home lives in harmony.
Downloads
References
Alfaleh, A., Alkattan, A., Alageel, A., Salah, M., Almutairi, M., Sagor, K., & Alabdulkareem, K. (2021). Onsite versus remote working: The impact on satisfaction, productivity, and performance of medical call center workers. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 58, 00469580211056041. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211056041
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2021). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(3), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211000398
Anakpo, G., Nqwayibana, Z., & Mishi, S. (2023). The impact of work-from-home on employee performance and productivity: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(5), 4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054529
Balushi, A. T. H., Al B. A., & Jalagat, J. (2022). Assessing the impact of remote working, work-life balance, and organizational commitment on employee productivity. European Academic Research, 10(4), 1521–1538.
Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2022). How hybrid working from home works out (NBER Working Paper No. 30292). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w30292
Boccoli, G., Gastaldi, L., & Corso, M. (2024). Transformational leadership and work engagement in remote work settings: The moderating role of the supervisor’s digital communication skills. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(7), 1240– 1257. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2023-0314
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. Z. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2021). Work from home and productivity: Evidence from personnel and analytics data on IT professionals. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 1(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/713458
Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B.,
… & van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
Nzuva, S. M., & Mwende Kimanzi, P. (2022). The impact of organisational culture on employees’ productivity: A comprehensive systematic review. European Journal of Business and Management, 14(2), 45–56.
Odunayo, H., & Fagbemide, O. (2024). The impact of remote work on organizational efficiency: Lessons from Nigerian telecommunications industry. ICCCM Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.53797/icccmjssh.v3i1.6.2024
Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 308–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0021
Savić, D. (2020). COVID-19 and work from home: Digital transformation of the workforce. The Grey Journal, 16(2), 101–104.
Shimura, A., Yokoi, K., Ishibashi, Y., Akatsuka, Y., & Inoue, T. (2021). Remote work decreases psychological and physical stress responses, but full-remote work increases presenteeism. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 730969.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730969
Shockley, K. M., Allen, T. D., Dodd, H., & Waiwood, A. M. (2021). Remote worker communication during COVID-19: The role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1466–1482. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000940
Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1800417
Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pan Rui, Amiya Bhaumik, Archita Chakraborty (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
