Great Power Competition in Central Asia: The Rise of China and the U.S. Response
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9yqmmm96Keywords:
Central Asia, China, U.S, rivalry.Abstract
Central Asia is a strategically important region for both the United States and China. Since 1991, the U.S. has sought to strengthen its position in the region through investments in various sectors, and some Central Asian countries allowed NATO access to their airbases for operations in Afghanistan. However, after 2001, U.S. influence declined due to Russian policies and the rise of China as a regional competitor. China has increased its influence in Central Asia through significant investments and strategic partnerships. This research examines the potential future rivalry between the U.S. and China in Central Asia. Using secondary sources such as journals, books, newspapers, and policy analyses, the study predicts ongoing geopolitical competition between the two powers. Findings suggest that the U.S. may attempt to counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative, both countries may form regional coalitions to protect their interests, and proxy conflicts could emerge as a means to limit each other’s influence in the region.
Downloads
References
ACE USA. (n.d.). Introduction to U.S.–Azerbaijan relations. https://ace-usa.org/blog/research/research-foreignpolicy/introduction-to-us-azerbaijan-relations
Allworth, E. A. (2009). Russia, China, and the United States in Central Asia. Strategic Studies Institute.
American Foreign Policy Council. (2025). An American strategy for greater Central Asia. https://www.afpc.org/publications/articles/an-american-strategy-for-greater-central-asia
Amnesty International. (2025, August). China: Still no accountability for crimes against humanity in Xinjiang three years after major UN report. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/08/china-still-no-accountability-for-crimes-against-humanity-in-xinjiang-three-years-after-major-un-report
Atlantic Council. (n.d.-a). The United States can’t offset its rivals in Central Asia alone: Turkey can help. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/turkeysource/the-united-states-cant-offset-its-rivals-in-central-asia-alone-turkey-can-help
Atlantic Council. (n.d.-b). U.S. strategy toward China’s Belt and Road Initiative. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/us-strategy-toward-china-s-belt-and-road-initiative
Brookings Institution. (n.d.). Contributions of Central Asian nations to the campaign against terrorism. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/contributions-of-central-asian-nations-to-the-campaign-against-terrorism
Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The grand chessboard: American primacy and its geostrategic imperatives. Basic Books.
Business Standard. (n.d.). Threat of terrorism from Taliban rising in Afghanistan region: UN report. https://www.business-standard.com/world-news/threat-of-terrorism-from-taliban-rising-in-afghanistan-region-un-report-123061100110_1.htm
CCSENet. (n.d.). Journal article. https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/49997
Center for a New American Security. (n.d.). Beyond Afghanistan: A regional security strategy for South and Central Asia. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/beyond-afghanistan-a-regional-security-strategy-for-south-and-central-asia
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (n.d.). Connecting the dots: Xinjiang forced labor, forced assimilation, and Western supply chains. https://www.csis.org/analysis/connecting-dots-xinjiang-forced-labor-forced-assimilation-and-western-supply-chains
Chatham House. (2025, March). Playing both sides: Central Asia between Russia and the West. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/03/playing-both-sides-central-asia-between-russia-and-west
Congress.gov. (n.d.). CRS product R46924. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R46924
Consilium Institute. (n.d.). Central Asia geopolitics: Great power opportunity. https://consiliuminstitute.org/central-asia-geopolitics-great-power-opportunity/
Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.-a). China: Xinjiang Uyghurs, Muslims, repression, genocide, and human rights. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs-muslims-repression-genocide-human-rights
Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.-b). Russia’s offensive in Georgia signals NATO to stay away. https://www.cfr.org/interview/russias-offensive-georgia-signal-nato-stay-away-its-space
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/humaff-2020-0022/html#j_humaff-2020-0022_ref_021
Forbes.kz. (n.d.). What the U.S. means for Kazakhstan: Numbers and facts. https://forbes.kz/articles/chto_znachit_ssha_dlya_kazahstana_tsifryi_i_faktyi
Forbes.kz. (n.d.). What the U.S. means for Kazakhstan: Numbers and facts. https://forbes.kz/articles/chto_znachit_ssha_dlya_kazahstana_tsifryi_i_faktyi
Foreign Affairs. (2016, April 18). Why Russian President Putin took Crimea from Ukraine. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2016-04-18/why-russian-president-putin-took-crimea-from-ukraine
Foreign Policy in Focus. (n.d.). Russia–Iran–China alliance signals deep shift in global power. https://fpif.org/russia-iran-china-alliance-signals-deep-shift-in-global-power/
Foreign Policy Research Institute. (2023, February). Russia is down but not out in Central Asia. https://www.fpri.org/article/2023/02/russia-is-down-but-not-out-in-central-asia/
Gul, A. (2022). Revisiting US–China strategic competition in Central Asia and its impact on Pakistan. Public Administration and Policy, 25(4), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2764
https://chinaglobalsouth.com/analysis/china-central-asia-cooperation-centers-soft-power/
IDEAS RePEc. (n.d.). International studies journal article. https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intstu/v44y2007i2p141-155.html
ISS Europe. (n.d.). Security risks emanating from Afghanistan. https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/security-risks-emanating-afghanistan
Jamestown Foundation. (n.d.). Flowing downstream: The Sino–Kazakh water dispute. https://jamestown.org/program/flowing-downstream-the-sino-kazakh-water-dispute
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Tajikistan. (n.d.). Iran–Tajikistan political relations. https://tajikistan.mfa.gov.ir/portal/generalcategoryservices/4105/روابط-سیاسی-ایران-و-تاجیکستان
National Institute for Defense Studies. (2007). East Asian strategic review 2007. https://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/east-asian/pdf/2007/east-asian_e2007_02.pdf
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (n.d.). Education. https://www.osce.org/education
Rashid, A. (2017). The resurgence of Central Asia: Islam or nationalism? New York Review Books.
RFE/RL. (n.d.). Human Rights Watch calls out worsening situation in Central Asia. https://about.rferl.org/article/human-rights-watch-calls-out-worsening-situation-in-central-asia/
Shebar, M. A. (2023). Afghanistan–Central Asia relations in post–Cold War: Prospects and challenges (Doctoral dissertation, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi).
Small, A. (2015). The China–Pakistan axis: Asia’s new geopolitics. Oxford University Press.
Springer. (n.d.). Journal article. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40647-017-0210-y
State.gov. (2020, February). United States strategy for Central Asia 2019–2025. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/FINAL-CEN-Strategy-Glossy-2-10-2020-508.pdf
Tasnim News. (2024, December 5). Iran eyes close alliance with China, Russia in countering U.S. unilateralism. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2024/12/05/3213611/iran-eyes-close-alliance-with-china-russia-in-countering-us-unilateralism
United Nations Security Council. (n.d.). Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement. https://www.main.un.org/securitycouncil/en/sanctions/1267/aq_sanctions_list/summaries/entity/eastern-turkistan-islamic-movement
Wilson Center. (n.d.). The Russia–Georgia conflict: What happened and future implications for U.S. foreign policy. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the-russia-georgia-conflict-what-happened-and-future-implications-for-us-foreign-policy
Winkler, S. C. (2023). US and China competition for influence in Central Asia: A comparative analysis. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poad010
Wired. (2009, June). U.S. payoff keeps key hub for Afghanistan open. https://www.wired.com/2009/06/us-payoff-keeps-key-hub-for-afghanistan-open
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mahram Ali Shebar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
