The Effect of Supporting Scientific Research and Publication on the Globally Rank
Keywords:
published international research, supporting of scientific research, global rank, Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University.Abstract
The rankings of global universities have led to the notion of a global university market developed in a single platform, with the main objective being the opportunity for comparison. Consequently, this has led to international competitive pressures in the education sector. The present work illustrates with evidence through published international research and scientific research, the global rank of Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University.
Design/methodology/approach -Data was gathered from various sources including deanship of scientific research, QS World university rankings website, and Shanghai ranking, along with a questionnaire distributed to the academic individuals from Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University. The study made use of tools to test the relationships between the dependent and independent variables.
Findings- the finding of study will provide after data collection; we believe that the finding will support and enrich the previous literature review. Moreover, the findings help the academics and policy making to understand the current situation among Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University.
Originality/value- we believe that this study is one of best study that to examine the effect of supporting scientific research and publication on the globally rank among Prince Sattam bin Abdul Aziz University. Moreover, this study adds significant information that enhances the current literature review and will be guide for future research. Point of Importance, the study is a unique endeavor as it illustrates the relationships backed by scientific research and publications of global rankings of universities, with a specific focus on elite universities.
Downloads
References
Amsler, S.S. and C. Bolsmann, University ranking as social exclusion. British journal of sociology of education, 2012. 33(2): p. 283-301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.649835.
Jöns, H. and M. Hoyler, Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings. Geoforum, 2013. 46: p. 45-59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.014.
Pusser, B., The state, the market and the institutional estate: Revisiting contemporary authority relations in higher education, in Higher Education. 2008, Springer. p. 105-139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6959-8_4.
Pusser, B., Power and authority in the creation of a public sphere trough higher education. PUSSER, B., KEMPER, K., MARGINSON, S. AND ORDORIKA, I. Universities and the Public Sphere: Knowledge Creation and State Building in the Era of Globalization. New York, 2012: p. 27-46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847848.
Pusser, B. and S. Marginson, University rankings in critical perspective. The journal of higher education, 2013. 84(4): p. 544-568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2013.0022.
Goodall, A., Raise your game. Times Higher Education, 2010. 23, 67-78.
Marginson, S., Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 2007. 29(2): p. 131-142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701351660.
Hazelkorn, E. Impact of global rankings on higher education research and the production of knowledge. Citeseer, 3, 126-138 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.1.
Hazelkorn, E., Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 2008. 21(2): p. 193-215.
Marginson, S. and M. Van der Wende, To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of studies in international education, 2007. 11(3-4): p. 306-329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544.
Branstetter, L.G. and M. Sakakibara, When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review, 2002. 92(1): p. 143-159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015649.
Brooks, R., Measuring university quality. The Review of Higher Education, 2005. 29(1): p. 1-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2005.0061.
Ordorika, I. and B. Pusser, La máxima casa de estudios: The Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México as a state-building university. World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America, 2007: p. 189-215.
Osborne, J., What happened to social justice? On the European higher education area (EHEA). Journal of Critical Globalization Studies, Comment Piece, 2010, 2(4), 84-97.
Carnoy, M., Political theory and the state. 1984, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 127- 176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400853458.
Feuer, M.J., L. Towne, and R.J. Shavelson, Scientific culture and educational research. Educational researcher, 2002. 31(8): p. 4-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008028.
Sacristán, I.O. and I. Ordorika, Power and politics in university governance: Organization and change at the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. 2003: Psychology Press, 765-786
Schraeder, A.K., A Quantitative Examination of Parental Involvement and Fifth Grade Reading Comprehension. 2015: Northcentral University, 6, 12-18.
Kaul, I., Providing (contested) global public goods, in Authority in the global political economy. 2008, Springer. p. 89-115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230584297_4.
Wallsten, S.J., The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2000: p. 82-100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2601030.
Yigitcanlar, T., Making space and place for the knowledge economy: knowledge-based development of Australian cities. European Planning Studies, 2010. 18(11): p. 1769-1786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2010.512163.
Jaffee, A.B., Building Program Evaluation into the Design of Public Research Support Programs. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2002. 18: p. 22-34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.22.
Lerner, J., The government as venture capitalist: the long-run impact of the SBIR program. The Journal of Private Equity, 2000. 3(2): p. 55-78 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2000.319960.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
