CENTRAL ASIA AS VIEWED BY CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL ANALYSTS
Abstract
This is the second part of the historiography on literature about Central Asia which appeared earlier this year in Central Asia and the Caucasus.1 It is intended to fill the gap about the books on Central Asia which have appeared in the last two years that were not covered in the previous article.
Downloads
References
See: M. Laumulin, A. Malik, “Central Asia as Viewed by Contemporary Political Analysts,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 11, Issue 1, 2010.
See: F. Facchini (a cura di), Popoli della Yurta. Kazakhstan tra le origini e la modernita, Jaca Book, Milan, 2008,320 pp.
See: Great Powers and Regional Integration in Central Asia: A Local Perspective, ed. by M. Esteban, N.de Pedro,Exlibris Ediciones, Madrid, 2009, 140 pp.
See: La situation de la gobernanza en Asia Central, Coordinada pro G.M. Tabener, E. Soms Bach, Casa Asia,Madrid, 2009, 101 pp.
See: S. Peyrouse, “Facing the Challenges of Separatism: The EU, Central Asia and the Uyghur Issue,” EUCAM Policy Brief, No. 4, January 2009, EUCAM, Brussels, 2009, 16 pp.; idem, “Business and Trade Relationships between the EU and Central Asia,” EUCAM Working Paper, No. 1, June 2009, EUCAM, Brussels, 2009.
See: S.F. Starr, S. Cornell, S.M. Oksajärvi, Finland’s Development Cooperation in Central Asia and South Cau-casus (Evaluation Report 2009:1), The Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, Helsinki, 2009, VI+70 pp.
The EU strategies in it relations with Kazakhstan can be found in “Le Kazakhstan: Partnaire Stratégique de
l’Europe,” in: Diplomatie. Affaires Stratégiques et Relations Internationales, AREION, Paris, 2009, 16 pp.
See: G. Tulepbergenova, “The Greater Central Asia Project: Present State and Evolution,” Central Asia’s Affairs (KazISS, Almaty), No. 2, 2009, pp. 5-10.
See: S.F. Starr, “Rediscovering Central Asia,” The Wilson Quarterly (The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars), Summer 2009; idem, In Defense of Greater Central Asia, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Stud-ies Program, A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, Washington, D.C., 2008,18 pp.
See: A. Cohen, Kazakhstan: The Road to Independence. Energy Policy and the Birth of a Nation, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Washington, D.C., 2008, 287 pp.; S. Horák, J. Šír, Dismantling Totali-tarianism? Turkmenistan under Berdimuhamedow, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Wash-ington, D.C., 2009, 97 pp.
See: Japan’s Silk Road Diplomacy. Paving the Road Ahead., ed. by C. Len, U. Tomohiko, H. Tetsuya, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Washington, D.C., 2009, 206 pp.
See: M. Laruelle, S. Peyrouse, China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Washington, D.C., 2009, 201 pp.
See: M. Clarke, “China’s Integration of Xinjiang with Central Asia: Securing a ‘Silk Road’ to Great Power Sta-tus,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly (ISDP, Stockholm), Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008, pp. 89-111; M. Laruelle, S. Pey-rouse, “Editors’ Note: Central Asian Perceptions of China,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009,pp. 1-8; idem, “Cross-border Minorities as Cultural and Economic Mediators between China and Central Asia,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009, pp. 93-119; M. Oresman, “Reassessing the Fleeting Potential for U.S.-China Cooperation in Central Asia,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008, pp. 5-14; S. Peyrouse,
La présence chinoise en Asie centrale. Portée geopolitique, enjeux économiques et impact culturel,” Etudes de CERI,No. 148, 2008; idem, “Chinese Economic Presence in Kazakhstan. China’s Resolve and Central Asia’s Apprehension,”Chinese Perspectives, No. 3, 2008, pp. 34-49; idem, “Central Asia’s Growing Partnership with China,” EUCAM Work-ing Paper, No. 4, October 2009, EUCAM, Brussels, 15 pp.; Y. Schicor, “China’s Central Asian Strategy and the Xin-jiang Connection: Predicaments and Medicaments in a Contemporary Perspective,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quar-terly, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008, pp. 55-74; J. Šír, S. Horák, “China as an Emerging Superpower in Central Asia: The View from Ashkhabad,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008, pp. 75-88; M.C. Spechler, “Why Does China Have No Business in Central Asia?” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2009, pp. 3-15; R. Sutter,
Durability in China’s Strategy toward Central Asia—Reasons for Optimism,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarter-ly, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2008, pp. 3-10.
See: M. Balooch, “Iran and India’s Cooperation toward Central Asia,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly,Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 25-30; M.A. Kaw, “Restoring India’s Silk Route Links with South and Central Asia across Kash-mir: Challenges and Opportunities,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2009, pp. 59-74; J.P. Panda,
India’s Approach to Central Asia: Strategic Intents and Geopolitical Calculus,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarter-ly, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 103-114.
See: G. Germanovich, “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Threat to American Interests in Central Asia?”
The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2008, pp. 19-38; S. Peyrouse, M. Laruelle, “The Shanghai Co-operation Organization: Successes and Challenges,” The Journal of Central Asian Studies (Kashmir University), Vol. 28,No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-14; N. Swanström, “Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Aftermath of the Russian Invasion of Georgia,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2008, pp. 3-8; Yang Shu, “Reassessing the SCO’s In-ternal Difficulties: A Chinese Point of View,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 17-24;S. Hanova, “Perspectives on the SCO: Images and Discourses,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3,2009, pp. 63-82; S. Peyrouse, “Drug-trafficking in Central Asia,” Policy Brief. Institute for Security and Development Policy (Stockholm), No. 8, September 2009, pp. 1-4.
See: G. Gleason, R.R. Hanks, Y. Bosin, “Afghanistan Reconstruction in Regional Perspective,” Central Asian Survey (Oxford), Vol. 28, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 275-287; S.F. Starr, “A Regional Approach to Afghanistan and Its Neighbors,”in: Strategic Asia 2008-2009, National Bureau of Asian Affairs, Seattle, 2008, pp. 333-362; S. Chan, “Breaking the Impasse in Afghanistan: Problems with Neighbours, Brothers and Guests,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4,2008, pp. 103-128; S. Khan, “Stabilization of Afghanistan: U.S./NATO Regional Strategy and the Role of SCO,” The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2009, pp. 11-16.
See: E. Marat, Labor Migration in Central Asia: Implications of the Global Economic Crisis, Central Asia-Cau-casus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, Washington, D.C., 2009, 48 pp.
See: E. Marat, The Military and the State in Central Asia. From Red Army to Independence, Routledge, London,2009, 176 pp.
See: J. Aitken, Nazarbaev and the Making of Kazakhstan, Continuum, London, New York, 2009, IX+256 pp.
See: D. Schreiber, Kasachstan. Nomadenwege zwischen Kaspischem Meer und Altaj, Trescher Verlag, Berlin, 2009,430 S.
See: Zentralasien: der Blick nach Aussen. Internationale Politik aus zentralasiatischer Sicht, Fridrich Ebert Stif-tung, Berlin, 2008, 615 S.
See: Contemporary Kazakhstan: The Way Ahead, ed. by A. Mohanty, S. Swain, Axis Publications, New Delhi,2009, XV+314 pp.
See: P. Chuvin, R. Létolle, S. Peyrouse, Histoire de l’Asie centrale contemporaine, Fazard, Paris, 2008, 375 pp.
See: R. Létolle, La mer d’Aral, L’Harmattan, Paris, 2009, 318 pp. (J. MacKay discusses similar problems in his “Running Dry: International Law and the Management of Aral Sea Depletion,” Central Asian Survey (Oxford), Vol. 28,Issue 1, 2009, pp. 17-27).
See: S. Peyrouse, “The Multiple Paradoxes of the Agriculture Issue in Central Asia,” EUCAM Working Paper,No. 6, 2009, 14 pp.
See: Reconnecting India and Central Asia: Emerging Security and Economic Dimensions, ed. by N. Joshi, Cen-tral Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program- A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center, Johns Hop-kins University-SAIS, Washington, D.C., 2010, IX+182 pp.
See: Gody, kotorye izmenili Tsentral’nuiu Aziu, TsSPI-IV RAN, Moscow, 2009, 331 pp.
See: I. Zviagelskaia, Stanovlenie gosudarstv Tsentral’noy Azii: politicheskie protsessy, Aspekt Press, Moscow,2009, 208 pp.
See: S.V. Zhukov, O.B. Reznikova, Tsentral’naia Azia i Kitai: ekonomicheskoe vzaimodeystvie v usloviakh glo-balizatsii, IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2009, 179 pp.
See: G.I. Chufrin, Rossia v Tsentral’noy Azii, KISI, Almaty, 2010, 220 pp.
See: Novye tendentsii vo vneshney politike Rossii v Tsentral’noy Azii i na Kavkaze., ed. by G.I. Chufrin, IMEMO,Moscow, 2008, 181 pp.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
