JAPAN’S POLICY IN CENTRAL ASIA AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION

Authors

  • Sergey ZHILTSOV D.Sc. (Political Science), Head of the Department of Political Science and Political Philosophy, Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia; Professor, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Research Fellow, S.Yu. Witte Moscow University (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author

Keywords:

Japan, Central Asia, EU, the U.S., Russia, energy, hydrocarbon resources, pipelines

Abstract

After the breakup of the U.S.S.R., Japan began developing and implementing its foreign policy towards Central Asia (CA). Japan’s attention to countries in
 the region was determined by its long-term economic and political interests. First and foremost, Japan was interested in gaining access to the assets of CA countries: their fuel and energy complex and mineral deposits. The need to address this problem was dictated by the country’s limited natural resources and its heavy dependence on hydrocarbon imports. Accordingly, Japanese policy was aimed to gain unimpeded access to the hydrocarbon resources of CA countries and create reliable export routes for oil and gas in the interests of its own economy. This is why the creation of alternative pipeline routes for transporting oil and gas from Central Asia was a key goal for Japan. But its achievement was hindered by Central Asia’s geographical remoteness. As a result, Japan lost out to China, which borders on CA countries. Nevertheless, Japan proposed a number of pipeline projects that should have given it access to Central Asian resources, mainly through Chinese territory.
Japan tried to create multilateral formats of cooperation with CA countries by launching various initiatives. But Tokyo’s efforts failed to produce a positive result in view of the disunity and heterogeneity of countries in the region, which did not constitute a single geopolitical unit. Domestic political processes in the CA countries developed differently as they faced a set of economic and social problems. As a result, Japan built its policy regarding the Central Asian countries mainly on a bilateral basis. Of particular interest to Japan were Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, which have significant oil and gas reserves.
Although Japan’s long-term goals have practically not changed over time, its Central Asia policy can be divided into several stages, each of which has its own specific features determined by the development of the geopolitical situation in Central Asia, the influence of other extra-regional states on countries in the region, and the interests of the Central Asian countries. In recent years, Japan has actively implemented its policy by expanding bilateral cooperation while retaining an interest in multilateral cooperation formats.

Downloads

References

See: F.P. Urazayeva, “Otnosheniya Yaponii so stranami Tsentralnoi Azii,” Voprosy natsionalnykh i federativnykh otnosheni, No. 1, 2017, pp. 180-188.

See: K. Darabi, Sh.Nabati, “Vneshniaia politika Kitaia v Tsentralnoi Azii v perekhodnoi ere,” The Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture, No. 3, 2018, pp. 109-119.

See: M.Yu. Igitian, “Geopoliticheskaia strategiia vedushchikh i regionalnykh gosudarstv v Tsentralnoi Azii,” Etnosotsium i mezhnatsionalnaia kultura, No. 12, 2017, pp. 163-175.

See: Central Asia: Its Strategic Importance and Future Prospects, ed. M. Hafeez, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1994, 337 pp.

See: I.S. Zonn, “Veliki Sholkovyi put stanovitsia velikim neftegazovym putem,” Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, No. 2, 2015, pp. 34-44.

See: O.A. Dobrinskaya, “Energeticheskaia diplomatia Yaponii i Tsentralnaia Azia,” Ezhegodnik Yaponia, No. 40, 2011, pp. 38-51.

See: S.S. Zhiltsov, I.S. Zonn, Kaspiiskaia truboprovodnaia geopolitika, Vostok-Zapad, Moscow, 2011, 320 pp.

See: D.A. Mileev, “Vneshniaia politika Yaponii v Tsentralnoi Azii,” in: Strany SNG v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii (collected articles), Institute of Oriental Studies, Moscow, 2008, pp. 523-543.

See: E.A. Gavrilina, “Prioritety vneshnei politiki Yaponii v stranakh Tsentralnoi Azii na sovremennom etape,” Armia i obshchestvo, No. 2, 2012, pp. 120-125.

See: V.V. Yevseev, “Tsentralnaia Azia: igra na protivorechiiakh osnovnykh vneshnepoliticheskikh igrokov,” Vostok, Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoria i sovremennost, No. 4, 2013, pp. 70-83.

See: O.Ya. Dobrinskaya, “Yaponia-Tsentralnaia Aziya: v poiskakh nefti i statusa,” Azia i Afrika segodnia, No. 8, 2011, pp. 45-50.

See: EA. Borodin, “Ofitsialnaia pomoshch razvitiiu kak osnova razvitiia otnoshenii Yaponii so stranami Tsentralnoi Azii,” Kazanskaia nauka, No. 4, 2013, pp. 15-19.

See: EF. Troitsky, M.Yu. Kim, “Politika Yaponii v Tsentralnoi Azii (1992-2016),” Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstven- nogo universiteta. Istoria, No. 50, 2017, pp. 84-88.

See: O.A. Dobrinskaya, “Energeticheskaia diplomatia Yaponii i Tsentralnaia Azia.”

See: O.Ya. Dobrinskaya, “Yaponia-Tsentralnaia Azia: v poiskakh nefti i statusa.”

See: M. Nurgaliev, T. Shaymergenov, “Japanese Diplomacy Makes New Headway in Central Asia: Its Problems, Expectations, and Prospects,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 6 (48), 2007, pp. 125-135.

See: I. Tomberg, “Central Asia and the Caspian: A New Stage in the Great Energy Game,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 5 (41), 2006, pp. 20-34.

See: G.N. Kim, “Interesy stran ATR na Kaspii,” in: Tsentralnaya Aziya i Kaspiiski region: riski, vyzovy, ugrozy, ed.B.K. Sultanov, KISI, Almaty, 2012, p. 170.

See: K.L. Syroyezhkin, Kazakhstan-Kitai: ot prigranichnoi torgovli k strategicheskomu partnerstvu, Vol. 2, KISI, Almaty, 2010, p 117.

See: G. Ismayilzada, “A New Pillar of Japanese Foreign Policy: The Arc of Freedom and Prosperity—Japanese Policy Toward the Guam Organization,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 3-4 (51-52), 2008, pp. 196-202.

See: EF. Troitsky, M.Yu. Kim, op. cit.

See: Ya.O. Zakhariev, “Yaponia v Tsentralnoi Azii v nachale XXI veka: izuchenie problemy ekonomicheskogo vli- ianiia kitaiskimi spetsialistami,” Ekonomika Tsentralnoi Azii, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2017, pp. 11-18.

See: Ibidem.

See: M. Glyants, “Kitaiskaia initsiativa ‘Odin poias—odin put’: chto mozhet sdelat brend,” Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, No. 1, 2017, pp. 8-19.

See: N. Murashkin, I. Akylbaev, “Yaponia i Tsentralnaia Azia. ‘Tikhoye’ partnerstvo s privlecheniem vneregionalnykh igrokov,” 20 June, 2017, available at: [https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/yaponiya-i-tsentralna- ya-aziya-tikhoe-partnerstvo-s-privlecheniem-vneregionalnykh-igrokov/], 8 November, 2019.

See: E.S. Alekseenkova, “Sravnitelnyi analiz deiatelnosti sozdannykh v Tsentralnoi Azii formatov ‘5+1’ (s uchastiem SShA, Yuzhnoi Korei, Yaponii i EES),” Mezhdunarodnaya analitika, No. 1 (19), 2017, pp. 29-41.

See: A. Katkova, “Strategicheskie initsiativy Yaponii v stranakh Tsentralnoi Azii,” Mirovoe i natsionalnoe khoziaistvo, No. 1, 2018.

See: V. Mozebakh, “Investitsionnaia deiatelnost Yaponii v stranakh Tsentralnoi Azii,” Mirovoe i natsionalnoe kho- ziaistvo, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-3.

See: A.A. Kazantsev, I.D. Zviagelskaia, E.M. Kuzmina, S.G. Luzianin, Perspektivy sotrudnichestva Rossii i Kitaia v Tsentralnoi Azii. Doklad No. 28, 2016, Russian International A Council, RSMD, Moscow, 2016, 52 pp.

See: “Takoe vkusnoe bliudo, pod nazvaniem Tsentralnaia Azia,” 1 September, 2019, available at [https://polit-asia. kz/takoe-vkusnoe-blyudo-pod-nazvaniem-czentralnaya-aziya/], 11 November, 2019.

See: F.P. Urazaeva, op. cit.

See: “Novyi ekonomicheskii koridor v Tsentralnoi Azii—alternativa evraziiskoi integratsii?” 6 June, 2019, available at [https://www.ritmeurasia.org/news--2019-06-04--novyj-ekonomicheskij-koridor-v-ca-alternativa-evrazijskoj-integra- cii-43021], 12 November, 2019.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-31

How to Cite

ZHILTSOV, S. (2024). JAPAN’S POLICY IN CENTRAL ASIA AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 21(1), 42-50. https://ca-c.org/index.php/cac/article/view/1253

Plaudit

Similar Articles

141-150 of 956

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>