POST-SOVIET ASIA: NEW GEOPOLITICAL TRENDS AND RUSSIA’S INTERESTS
Abstract
Until the late 1999, post-Soviet Central Asia as a whole, with the exception of Tajikistan, was seen as a stable region not prone to conflicts. There was still no talk of another round of the Big Game that brought the leading world centers into the continent’s “heartland.” This talk began later, at the end of 2001. Today, we all know that the external stability of the 1990s was nothing but a shell filled with vast destructive potential. So far, the Central Asian republics have not yet identified their geopolitical vectors—too many countries with special interests are present in the region.
This, together with the vast and varied raw material resources, has greatly increased the newly sovereign Central Asian countries’ geopolitical and geo-economic weight.
In 2005-2006, “new Asia” attracted more attention from observers than the other post-Soviet regions. The Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan, the Andijan events in Uzbekistan, and the presidential elections in Kazakhstan provided ample forecasting material. Today the Central Asian situation has become relatively stable, yet serious storms are still to come.
Russia’s policy, although betraying new trends in this key region, remains vague. Today, however, Russia should acquire a new conception of its political and economic presence in Central Asia.
Downloads
References
See: S. Luzianin, “Prognoz dlia Kirgizii,” NG-Dipkur’er, 25 April, 2005.
D. Glumskov, “Besslavnyi konets epokhi: blizhayshie mesiatsy dlia Kirgizii stanut ochen’ slozhnymi i politicheski,i ekonomicheski,” Ekspert-Kazakhstan, 12 April, 2005.
N. Nazarbaev, Na poroge XXI veka, Almaty, 1996, pp. 78-79.
P. Sviatenkov, “Kazakhstan sdelaiut liderom,” APN-Kazakhstan, 7 November, 2005.
See: O. Sidorov, “Neftianye interesy Kitaia v Tsentral’noy Azii,” Gazeta.kz, 16 October, 2003.
K. Kosachev, “ShOS kak al’ternativa amerikanskomu vliianiu v Tsentral’noy Aziii,” NG-Dipkur’er, 29 Septem-ber, 2003.
See: T. Stanovaia, “Iz ShOS v ODKB pereletaia,” Politkom Ru, 21 June, 2004.
See: E. Karin, “ShOS i ee znachenie dlia Tsentral’noy Azii. Gosudarstva TsA posle 11 sentiabria,” Assandi Times,25 June, 2004.
See: V. Khliupin, “Tsentral’naia Azia: kogda bessil’na vostochnaia mudrost’,” Rosbalt, 6 April, 2005.
See: M. Walker, “Problema ‘Bol’shoy Karty.’ Izdaleka i svysoka sobytia vidiatsia po-drugomu,” United Press International, 29 March, 2005, available at [http://www.inosmi.ru/print/218443.html].
See: R. Streshnev, “Na novyi uroven’ integratsii,” Krasnaia zvezda, 21 April, 2004.
See: K. Aiapova, “Kranovaia diplomatia,” Delovia nedelia, Kazakhstan, 11 February, 2005.
See: D. Kholmatov, “ ‘Medvezhia usluga’: SShA ne puskaiut evropeytsev k uzbekskomu uranu,” Transkaspiyskiy proekt, 19 June, 2001.
See: N. Ziiadullaev, “Tsentral’naia Azia: konkurentsia i partnerstvo,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 2 July, 2007.
See: A. Matveev, “V tsentre geopolitiki superderzhav. Ekonomicheskaia aktivnost’ na Kaspii dopolniaetsia voen-noy,” Voenno-promyshlennyi kur’er, 20-26 June, 2007.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
