REGIONAL CENTERS OF POWER AND THEIR EURASIAN POLITICS (Rivalry in the Islamic East— The Turkish Vector)

Authors

  • Pavel VARBANETS Ph.D. (Political Science), fellow at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations,Ukraine National Academy of Sciences (Kiev, Ukraine) Author

Abstract

In the last twenty years, the international relations system has undergone major changes, however, contrary to America’s expectations, the bipolar world order that disappeared together with the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War was not replaced with a unipolar world. Today, international processes are somewhat chaotic, which explains the appearance of several poles of power—the United States, EU, Russia, Southeast Asia, and the Islamic world. While in the West the rivalry over spheres of influence is drawing to an end and a new order has all but emerged, the Islamic world is only just being drawn into the process. There is the opinion in the expert community that the Muslim world will change its makeup and the Arabic domination of today will be replaced with a new system concentrated around new centers of power such as Turkey and Iran. The former is claiming the role of a regional leader in the Islamic East due to several new circumstances: it enjoys the most advanced and stable Islamic democracy, a dynamically developing economy, and the largest corridors of energy resources. The mounting rivalry over regional domination will inevitably heat up competition in Central Asia and the Caucasus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: H. Tincq, “Islam Democratique Contre Islamisme Radical,” Le Monde, 13 December, 2003.

Conservative Democracy and the Globalization of Freedom, Speech delivered by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo an at the American Enterprise Institute 29 January, 2004, available at [http://www.aei.org/events/filter.all,eventID.735/

ranscript.asp].

R.T. Erdo an, “A Broad View of the ‘Broader Middle East’,” Russia in Global Affairs, No. 4, 2004, available at [http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/numbers/8/587.html].

See: K. Kiri çi, Turkey’s Foreign Policy in Turbulent Times, Paris, 2006, p. 26.

See: Hurriet, 15 April, 2003.

See: O. Sanberk, “Vneshniaia politika v obstanovke neopredelennosti,” Radikal, 26 July, 2007, available at [http://

ww.inosmi.ru/translation/235756.html].

See: Turkiye, 15 November, 2007.

See: N. Mkhitarian, “The Process of Regional Integration in Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the Post-Bipolar World Period,” Achievements of World Politics, Issue 38, Kiev, 2007, pp. 211-212 (in Ukrainian).

See: K. Kiri çi, op. cit., p. 12.

S. Demirel, “Changing Central Asia in the New World Order,” Turkish Daily News, 19 September, 2007.

See: B. Sinkaya, “Turkey-Iran Relations in the 1990s and the Role of Ideology,” Perceptions, Vol. X, No. 1, Spring 2005, p. 12.

See: S.A. Khan, “Iran’s Relations with Central Asia—A Strategic Analysis,” Perceptions, Vol. IX, March-May 2004, p. 56.

See: Ibid., p. 57.

See: S. Demirel, op. cit.

See: K. Kiri çi, op. cit., p. 25.

S. Demirel, op. cit.

See: ANS-PRESS, 17 November, 2007.

See: N. Mkhitarian, op. cit., p. 207.

Downloads

Published

2008-02-29

Issue

Section

REGIONAL CENTERS OF POWER AND THEIR POLICY IN CENTRAL EURASIA

How to Cite

VARBANETS, P. (2008). REGIONAL CENTERS OF POWER AND THEIR EURASIAN POLITICS (Rivalry in the Islamic East— The Turkish Vector). CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 9(1), 43-50. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1160

Plaudit