REGIONAL CENTERS OF POWER AND THEIR EURASIAN POLITICS (Rivalry in the Islamic East— The Turkish Vector)
Abstract
In the last twenty years, the international relations system has undergone major changes, however, contrary to America’s expectations, the bipolar world order that disappeared together with the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War was not replaced with a unipolar world. Today, international processes are somewhat chaotic, which explains the appearance of several poles of power—the United States, EU, Russia, Southeast Asia, and the Islamic world. While in the West the rivalry over spheres of influence is drawing to an end and a new order has all but emerged, the Islamic world is only just being drawn into the process. There is the opinion in the expert community that the Muslim world will change its makeup and the Arabic domination of today will be replaced with a new system concentrated around new centers of power such as Turkey and Iran. The former is claiming the role of a regional leader in the Islamic East due to several new circumstances: it enjoys the most advanced and stable Islamic democracy, a dynamically developing economy, and the largest corridors of energy resources. The mounting rivalry over regional domination will inevitably heat up competition in Central Asia and the Caucasus.
Downloads
References
See: H. Tincq, “Islam Democratique Contre Islamisme Radical,” Le Monde, 13 December, 2003.
Conservative Democracy and the Globalization of Freedom, Speech delivered by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdo an at the American Enterprise Institute 29 January, 2004, available at [http://www.aei.org/events/filter.all,eventID.735/
ranscript.asp].
R.T. Erdo an, “A Broad View of the ‘Broader Middle East’,” Russia in Global Affairs, No. 4, 2004, available at [http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/numbers/8/587.html].
See: K. Kiri çi, Turkey’s Foreign Policy in Turbulent Times, Paris, 2006, p. 26.
See: Hurriet, 15 April, 2003.
See: O. Sanberk, “Vneshniaia politika v obstanovke neopredelennosti,” Radikal, 26 July, 2007, available at [http://
ww.inosmi.ru/translation/235756.html].
See: Turkiye, 15 November, 2007.
See: N. Mkhitarian, “The Process of Regional Integration in Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the Post-Bipolar World Period,” Achievements of World Politics, Issue 38, Kiev, 2007, pp. 211-212 (in Ukrainian).
See: K. Kiri çi, op. cit., p. 12.
S. Demirel, “Changing Central Asia in the New World Order,” Turkish Daily News, 19 September, 2007.
See: B. Sinkaya, “Turkey-Iran Relations in the 1990s and the Role of Ideology,” Perceptions, Vol. X, No. 1, Spring 2005, p. 12.
See: S.A. Khan, “Iran’s Relations with Central Asia—A Strategic Analysis,” Perceptions, Vol. IX, March-May 2004, p. 56.
See: Ibid., p. 57.
See: S. Demirel, op. cit.
See: K. Kiri çi, op. cit., p. 25.
S. Demirel, op. cit.
See: ANS-PRESS, 17 November, 2007.
See: N. Mkhitarian, op. cit., p. 207.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.