GUAM AND THE PRC

Authors

  • Wang JINGUO D.Sc. (Hist.), associate professor, Department of Political Science and Administration, Institute of Central Asian Studies at the Lanzhou University (Lanzhou, the People’s Republic of China) Author
  • Wang ZHIZUN M.Sc. (Sociology), lecturer at the Institute of Humanitarian Sciences and Art History, Lanzhou Technical University (Lanzhou, the People’s Republic of China) Author

Abstract

 The GUAM organization was officially founded as a political, economic, and strategic union called upon to strengthen the sovereignty of four former Soviet republics— Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova. In the ten years of its existence, GUAM has become an important structure striving to consolidate regional economic cooperation by developing the Europe-Caucasus-Asia transportation corridor. GUAM has also been a forum for discussing security problems, helping to settle conflicts, and eliminating other risks and threats. In 1996, Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, and Moldova made a joint statement in Vienna declaring their intention to create a union of these four countries. In April 1999, Uzbekistan joined it and the organization was named GUUAM (the abbreviation is made up of the first letters of the states involved). At that time, it was still an unofficial structure. In June 2001, the GUUAM countries held a summit in Yalta (Ukraine) and signed the Yalta Charter in which the Organization’s acting mechanism was set forth. Since then GUUAM has officially acquired the status of a regional formation.

Today, GUAM is attracting the attention of the world community. Despite the fact that its foreign policy has still not found any clear balance between the “toward the West” and “away from Russia” trends, the structure’s actions are  nevertheless trying to find this balance. Whatever the case, the GUAM organization appears to be a product of the fall and rise of two major geopolitical forces (the Russian geopolitical force and the Western geopolitical force led by the U.S.), as well as a result of the four states’ desire to represent a new geopolitical actor in the region. As GUAM develops, these two main geopolitical forces will continue to play a key and important role. Uzbekistan’s membership in GUAM followed by its withdrawal from it indicate the unstable position of the two leading geopolitical forces and the difficulties of turning the Organization into an effective regional geopolitical force.

Despite the fact that GUAM and the People’s Republic of China do not have direct ties, during the ten years of the member states’ independence, significant progress has been seen in the interrelations between them and the PRC. As we know, the GUAM states are located on the arc that passes from China to Europe through Central Asia. They are a bridge across which Chinese goods are exported to Europe, a potential transportation corridor for Eurasian electric power, and a channel of cultural exchange between the East and the West. Consequently, as the PRC’s economy continues to develop and the policy of openness becomes more entrenched, the republic will inevitably have to activate its bilateral and multilateral contacts with the GUAM member states individually and with the Organization as a whole. So an analysis of the geopolitical reasons for the formation and actions of GUAM, its development prospects, China’s relations with this young structure, and the potential influence of the latter on the PRC’s regional policy is of immense interest. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: “John Tefft: Prisoedinenie Gruzii k NATO budet polezno dlia vsekh,” 15 October, 2007, available at http://

ww.newsgeorgia.ru/geo1/20071015/42071526.html].

See: Phoenix Perspective: “Russia and America for Georgia,” 17 October, 2006, available at http://news.

hoenixtv.com/phoenixtv/83931293120724992/20061017/905699.shtml] (in Chinese).

Ibidem.

Ibidem.

For more on Ukrainian-Russian relations, see: Chen Xiong, “U.S. and Russian Rivalry in the Ukrainian Crisis,”Observations and Reflections!, 2004; Zhang Jian, “Crisis of Relations between Europe and Russia over Ukraine,” Current International Relations, No. 12, 2004; Lu Gang, Zhang Yao, “Ukrainian Elections and Geopolitics of Large Countries,”Russian Studies, No.1, 2005; Li Duanwu, “Ukraine between Russia and the United States—Political Evolutions in the Ge-opolitical Game,” Russian Studies, No. 4, 2005; Zhu Fitnes, “The Country is Full of Cracks—Crisis of the Presidential Election in Ukraine. Comprehensive Analysis and Reflections,” Scientific Studies, Nos. 1-4, 2005; Zhan Kuyili, “The Cri-mea and Ukraine, Reasons for the Dispute,” Siberian Studies, No. 4, 2006; Zhao Ming, “Russia and the United States in Ukraine,” International Studies, No. 6, 2002 (all in Chinese).

See: “The U.S., Russia, and Azerbaijan Aggravate the Question of Russia’s Right to Protect Territory,” available at [http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2005-04/15/content_ 2831861.htm] (in Chinese).

See: “The U.S. Demands the Withdrawal of Russian Troops from Moldova,” available at http://international.

ortheast.cn/system/2006/05/27/050406386.shtml] (in Chinese).

See: REGNUM Information Agency (on-line): “SShA otkazyvaiutsia ratifitsirovat’ DOVSE do vyvoda rossii-skikh voennykh iz Pridnestrovia,” available at [http://is.park.ru/doc.jsp?urn=7374578].

See: REGNUM Information Agency (on-line): “President Pridnestrovia: my budem provodit’ obshchuiu s Rossiei politiku,” available at [http://www.regnum.ru/news/647244.html].

See: “Chairman Mao on Peaceful Revolutions,” International Section of the newspaper Renmin ribao, 4 April,1968 (in Chinese).

Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Vol. 2, 2nd ed., Peoples’ Publishing House of the PRC, Beijing, 1994, pp. 240-241 (in Chinese).

See: Wang Yizhou, “The PRC in Relations with International Organizations. The Practice of Research Interpre-tation,” Working Documents Series (financed by the Ford Foundation). PRC Academy of Social Sciences. Institute of World Economics and Politics, No. 9, 2006, available at [http://old.iwep.org.cn/chinese/workingpaper/zgygjzz/1.pdf] (in Chinese).

See: G. Bezhuashvili (Georgian Foreign Minister), “Georgia and China in the Past, Present, and Future,” availa-ble at http://world.people.com.cn/BIG5/41214/5832725.html] (in Chinese).

See: Yang Jiechi (PRC Foreign Minister), “Traditional Friendship between China and Georgia Will Become Stronger Over the Years—on the 15th Anniversary of the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the Two Coun-tries,” available at [http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjdt/wsrc/t328735.htm].

See: Li Zhaoxing (PRC Foreign Minister), “‘A Friendship that Has Hurdled the Great Wall and Caspian Sea.’

elebration of the 15th Anniversary of the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the PRC and Azerbaijan,”available at [http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/chn/wjb/zzjg/dozys/gjlb/1676/1678/t307633.htm] (in Chinese).

See: The PRC Embassy in Ukraine, “‘We Will Strengthen Friendly Relations on Behalf of a Bright Future.’ In Honor of the 15th Anniversary of the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the PRC and Ukraine,” available at [http://ua.china-embassy.org/chn/zwgx/t312866.htm] (in Chinese).

See: Interview by PRC Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Moldova Mr. Gong Jianwei for Moldovan National Public Broadcasting, Information Bulletin of the PRC Embassy in Moldova, available at [http://

ww.chinaembassy.md/chn/zmgx/t266042.htm] (in Chinese).

Downloads

Published

2008-08-31

Issue

Section

GUAM: RELATIONS AMONG REGIONAL AND WORLD POWERS

How to Cite

JINGUO, W., & ZHIZUN, W. (2008). GUAM AND THE PRC. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 9(3-4), 173-186. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1175

Plaudit