SOME STATE LEGAL PROBLEMS IN THE ARMENIAN-AZERBAIJANI,NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT
Abstract
The Kosovo Precedent, which at first posed an enigma for the world community, showed, as events unfolded and they were subsequently understood, what can happen when the settlement of territorial conflicts falls outside the law, the regulations of international law adopted by the world community are ignored, and the law of force takes priority over the force of law (the events in Tibet, the aggravation of the situation in Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and the attempts by the Armenian armed forces to violate the ceasefire regime in Nagorno-Karabakh and on the border with Azerbaijan).
This calls for the powers of reason to exert every effort to ensure that Kosovo does not become a precedent and that the regulations of international law established by the members of the international community themselves remain the precedent in international relations. The world community is faced today with a vitally important task, the price of which is peace on Earth. This task is to ensure that the world is not redivided and that borders are not redrawn. The onset of the first stage in this process goes back to the beginning of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the beginning of Armenia’s aggression against Azerbaijan. The second stage began with the recognition of Kosovo’s independence. This task can only be solved by returning conflict settlement to the scope of the law, in so doing, restoring genuine respect for the regulations of international law established by the world community. This is what the GUAM Baku Declaration of 19 June, 2007 called for, after foreseeing this possible turn in events, by confirming the “need to continue active joint action to settle the protracted conflicts in the GUAM region by observing the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and inviolability of the states’ internationally recognized borders and in compliance with the provisions of the Joint Declaration of the GUAM Heads of State on Conflict Settlement, as well as the importance of mobilizing the support of the international community to settle these conflicts.
Downloads
References
See: S. Utchenko, Politicheskie ucheniia Drevnego Rima, Moscow, 1977, p. 41.
See: Prava cheloveka v mezhdunarodnom i vnutrigosudarstvennom prave (Ed.-in-chief, Professor R. Valeev),
Kazan State University, Kazan, 2004, p. 9.
See: Aristotel, Afinskaia politika, Moscow, 1996, pp. 17-18.
See: for example: Teoriia gosudarstva i prava. Lecture Course, ed. by M.N. Marchenko, Zertsalo, TEIS, Moscow, 1996, pp. 23-39; Osnovy teorii gosudarstva i prava. Textbook (Ed.-in-chief S.S. Alexeev), Iuridicheskaia literatura
Publishers, Moscow, 1971, pp. 38-41.
See: Gazette of the Supreme Soviet of the U.S.S.R., No. 15, 1990, Items 252 and 253
See: Full text of the report of the Armenian defense minister at the parliamentary hearings on the Nagorno-Karabakh problem is available at [http://www.regnum.ru/news/437271.html].
See: On the Abolishment of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region of the Azerbaijan Republic. Law of
the Azerbaijan Republic of 26 November, 1991, Gazette of the Supreme Soviet of the Azerbaijan Republic, No. 24,
, Art 448.
See: Collection of Documents of the Commonwealth of Independent States, No. 1, 1991, Art 6.
See: [http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/AdoptedText/ta05/ERES1416.htm].
See: Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (Helsinki, 1 August, 1975), available at [http://www.hri.org/docs/Helsinki75.html].
See: K. Hesse, Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 20th edition, Müller, Heidel-berg, 1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Author
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.