KYRGYZSTAN’S SECURITY PROBLEMS TODAY
Abstract
Regional stability and security consist of two levels—the external security of each country at the regional level and the internal security of each of them individually. A state’s external and internal security are closely interrelated concepts.
It stands to reason that ensuring internal security and stability is the primary and most important task. But the external aspect also requires attention. This article takes a look at the most important problems of ensuring Kyrgyzstan’s security.
The economic aspect occupies a central place in the academic discussions about national security. The keen attention to this problem is primarily provoked by the fact that a country’s security hinges on the state of its economy.
Kyrgyzstan is a country with a low level of economic development. During the Soviet era it depended wholly on the economy of the entire country. The budget was replenished from the common union fund, a practice that could not continue after the state acquired its independence.
The young state did not have enough funds and the necessary resources to meet its own needs. The breakdown in economic ties after the collapse of the Soviet Union generated negative changes in the economy, although internal reasons, such as the hastily and thoughtlessly conducted economic policy, de-centralization and privatization of state property in particular, wreaked greater havoc in the context of the economic crisis. Trade, industrial, and transportation enterprises were sold and resold in a short period of time to private organizations. The thriftless and careless attitude led to enterprises with immense economic possibilities and potential being broken down, parceled out, and essentially destroyed. Business management and free price formation, the functioning of a new fiscal and monetary system, and the development of new foreign economic relations have met with immense difficulties. Economic crisis is a consistent and legitimate phenomenon that inevitably occurs when the old order collapses and a new one is created.
Economic crisis usually leads to a cutback in the budget, an increase in non-payments, and a drop in the standard of living.1 The economic reforms being carried out in the country did not yield the desired results. The world economic crisis, which the post-Soviet countries are also enduring, cannot help but have an effect on the situation in Kyrgyzstan. Today, solving the republic’s most important task—ongoing economic reforms—is accompanied by accumulation of the external debt, which is creating a dangerous trend that is leading to an increase in poverty.
Downloads
References
See: A. Akunova, “O nekotorykh predposylkakh i sostoianii ekonomicheskogo krizisa v Kyrgyzstane,” Politika i
obshchestvo, No. 1(22), 2006.
See: T. Koichumanov, “Corruption Fighting and Preventive Measures in Kyrgyzstan: Today and Tomorrow,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 1 (37), 2006.
See: Ibidem.
See: M. Omarov, “Opasnaia bezopasnost malenkogo Kyrgyzstana,” Analitika. Tsentralnaia Aziia, available at [www.easttime.ru].
See: Ch. Abdykaparov, “Ekologicheskoe vozdeistvie na okruzhaiushchuiu sredu khvostokhranilishch i otvalov uranovykh i polimetallicheskikh rud v Kyrgyzskoi Respublike,” Polisfera, No. 3, 2000.
See: Countries at the Crossroads 2006. Country Reports, available at [www.freedomhouse.hu/nit.html].
See: M. Omarov, K voprosu o transgranichnom peredvizhenii cherez granitsy Kyrgyzstana, Information Analyti-cal Center, Institute of Strategic Analysis and Planning, Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University.
See: A. Krylov, “Religion in the Social and Political Life of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 6 (42), 2006.
See: O religioznoi obstanovke v Kyrgyzskoi Respublike i zadachakh organov vlasti po formirovaniiu gosudarstvennoi politiki v religioznoi sfere (Resolutions of the Republic of Kyrgyzstan No. 345 of 10 August, 1995; No. 20 of 17 January,1997; No. 83 of 19 February, 1998; No. 442 of 7 July, 1998; No. 107 of 28 February, 2000; No. 510 of 22 August, 2000;and No. 155 of 5 April, 2001).
[www.tazar.kg], 25 June, 2008.
See: A. Krylov, op. cit.
See: E. Karin, “Vnutripoliticheskie aspekty natsionalnoi bezopasnosti Kazakhstana,” Tsentralnaia Aziia i Kavkaz,No. 3 (4), 1999.
See: M. Duverger, Political Parties. Their Organization and Activity in Modern State, New York, 1964; R. Dahl,Political Opposition in Western Democracies, Yale University Press, 1966.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.