KAZAKHSTAN’S ECONOMY IN THE GRIPS OF THE WORLD FINANCIAL CRISIS
Abstract
During the past two years, the world economy has been functioning in the conditions of a global financial crisis that is having an impact on the economic development of almost every country in the world. The republic of Kazakhstan, which succeeded during the years of its independence to occupy a dignified place in the world economy, is no exception. It was the first CIS country (and one of the first in the world) to become caught in the grips of the financial crisis. It should be emphasized that the current crisis has primarily affected highly developed countries. Beginning in the U.S., it quickly pulled Germany, France, Japan, Great Britain, and other countries into its orbit. Although in terms of its main economic indices, Kazakhstan lags far behind these countries, there were many reasons why it followed right behind the U.S. and fell victim to the crisis earlier than many others. The first signs of the crisis phenomena appeared in this country as early as the end of the summer of 2007. It stands to reason that all the aspects of the global financial and economic crisis will become a target of comprehensive scientific study, from which the necessary practical conclusions will have to be drawn. Today it is too early to talk about the possible results of these studies, but some reasons for what is going on are already obvious. The main one seems to be that the theoretical concepts prevalent in world economic science over the past decades have proven untenable.
In the second half of the 20th century, particularly after the collapse of the world socialist system, most countries took a so-called neo-liberal approach to economic development problems. This approach espouses the principle of liberalism (free market relations in the economy) and the concept of monetarism (amplification of the role of financial capital in economic development). In compliance with this, free market relations are viewed as the only possible regulator of the development of national economies and the world economy as a whole, while the state is allotted the role of passive observer. But when national banks and corporations found themselves on the brink of bankruptcy, it was the governments of the largest capitalist countries that had to fork out huge amounts of money from the treasury to help them avoid collapse of their financial and economic systems. So the theory of liberal monetarism as a universal mechanism of economic regulation has not justified itself.
At the beginning of April 2009, a meeting of the leaders of the twenty largest nations of the world was held in London to look for ways out of the crisis. Several decisions were adopted that essentially meant a rejection of the neo-liberal theory. However, President of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbaev had been questioning its validity even earlier. At the beginning of March 2009, he realized that it was wrong for the republic’s economy to be oriented solely toward market relations and said that the economy should be “hand-steered,” which undoubtedly implied intensifying the government’s role in the country’s economic life.
Downloads
References
See: Kazakhstan za gody nezavisimosti (1991-2007), Republic of Kazakhstan Statistics Agency, Astana, 2008,pp. 75-76.
See: V. Babak, “The Oil and Gas Sector in Kazakhstan,” in: Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 4 (40), 2006, p. 47.
ncidentally, data published later and evidently revised give a slightly higher figure. For example, the report of the Repub-lic of Kazakhstan Statistics Agency Kazakhstan za gody nezavisimosti (1991-2007) (In the Period of Independence [1991-2007]) already cited gives a figure of $57.1 billion.
See: Kazakhstan za gody nezavisimosti (1991-2007), p. 74.
See: Ibid., p. 10.
Kazakhstanskaia pravda, 11 March, 2005.
See: Kontinent, 27 December, 2000-16 January, 2001, p. 19.
[http://www.rusoil.ru/opinions/o06-58.html].
Ibidem.
Calculated according to: V. Babak, op. cit., pp. 43, 45 and [http://lider-invest.com.ua/news/2008-02-14-1961].
See: Kazakhstan v 2008 godu, RK Statistics Agency, Astana, 2009, p. 12.
See: Kapital kz, No. 38, 16 October, 2008, available at [http://news.finance.ua/ru/-/2/0/all/2009/02/05150897/printable].
See: Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe razvitie Kazakhstana v 2008 g. (predvaritelnye itogi) (Kazakhstan’s Socioeconomic Development in 2008 [preliminary results]), RK Statistics Agency, Astana, 2009, p. 7.
Ibidem.
Ibid., p. 8.
“Srednesrochniy plan sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia Respubliki Kazakhstan na 2008-2010 gody,” RK Col-lected Acts of the President and the Government, No. 32, 2007, p. 354.
See: O. Skvortsov, “Finansovyy krizis: zarubezhnyy opyt (na primere Iaponii i Kazakhstana),” available at [http://www.
lerk.ru/columnists/skvortsov/?130694].
See: K. Sagadiev, “Mirovaia ekonomika perezhivaet rubikonnoe vremia,” Delovoi Kazakhstan, 6 March, 2009.
See: Kazakhstansko-britanskaia Torgovo-promyshlennaia palata. Perspektivy kazakhstanskoi ekonomiki (Kazakh-British Chamber of Commerce. Prospects of the Kazakh Economy), available at [http://kbcc.org.uk/ru/business-info/kaza-khstan-economy-outlook/].
See: A. Kurtov, “Tsentralnaia Aziia—ispytanie krizisom,” available at [http://www.centrasia.ru/newsA.php?st=1234569780].
V. Babak, “Kazakh Oil: Economic Booster or Dead Weight?” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 3 (9), 2001, p. 45.
N. Ramazanov, “Rost smenilsia padeniem,” available at [http://www.dn.kz/main/bank01.htm].
See: Program Statement of the Socialist Resistance of Kazakhstan about the crisis and measures for overcoming it… available at [http://www.kazakhstan.socializm.ru/ideology/program/antikrizis_econ_program_2009].
Ibidem.
[http://www.zakon.kz/our news/news_asp?id=30176764].
See: P. Svoik, “Ekonomika Kazakhstana na fone mirovogo krizisa: chto my sozdali i s chem ostaemsia?” availa-ble at [http://www.centrasia.ru/newsA.php?st=1225058400].
See: D. Satpaev, “V Kazakhstane zatiagivaiut poiasa,” RIA Novosti (Moscow), 14 October, 2008.
See: Kazakhstan za gody nezavisimosti (1991-2007), p. 11.
Ibidem.
See: Brief Results of the Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for January-April 2009, RK Statistics Agency, Astana, May 2009.
See: N. Ramazanov, “Dolgovaia iama vse glubzhe,” Delovaia nedelia, 10 April, 2009.
Ibidem.
See: N. Ramazanov, “Dolgovaia iama vse glubzhe.”
Ibidem.
See: RIA Novosti (Moscow), 24 September, 2008.
Ibidem.
Ibidem.
See: RIA Novosti (Moscow), 14 October, 2008.
V. Panfilova, “Nazarbaev meniaet ekonomicheskuiu strategiiu,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 25 November, 2008.
Ibidem.
See: N. Ramazanov, “Zhestkaia posadka,” available at [http://www.dn.kz/main/bank01.htm].
[http://www.zakon.kz/our/news/news.asp?id=30369373].
See: Kazakhstan segodnia, 19 November, 2008.
[http://news.finance.ua/ru/-/2/0/all/2009/02/05/150897/printable].
See: Press Dossier of the Kazakhstan National Economic Chamber “Soiuz Atameken,” 16 June, 2009.
See: Brief Results of the Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for January-May 2009, RK Statistics Agency, Astana, June 2009.
[http://www.centrasia.ru/news/A.php?st=1244816640].
See: RK Statistics Agency, available at [http://www.stat.kz/news/Pages.n2_01_07_2009.aspx].
See: Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan in January-May 2009, RK Statistics Agency,Astana, June 2009.
See: Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan in January-May 2009.
See: N. Ramazanov, “Rost smenilsia padeniem.”
See: Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan in January-May 2009.
Message of Kazakhstan President Nazarbaev to the Nation, 6 March, 2009.
N. Nazarbaev, “From a Speech to an Assembly of Investors,” 12 June, 2009.
Ibidem.
See: Brief Results of the Socioeconomic Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan for January-May 2009.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Author
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.