POTENTIAL CHANGE IN RUSSIA’S POSITION IN THE GLOBAL GAS MARKET AS THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE LOCAL ENERGY SECURITY MODEL
Abstract
Today, ensuring energy security is one of the key tasks for every state, whether it is a net exporter, net importer, or a transit country. With regard to the EU countries, the declaration of energy security as the priority issue of energy policy is largely due to low endowments of their own reserves of hydrocarbon resources and hence a high dependence on the suppliers of energy resources. As it happens, the EU’s own natural gas production is able to supply only 35% of the aggregate demand, with the rest being provided by Russia, Norway, Algeria, and Qatar. Since about a third of the total volume of gas imports comes from Russia, it creates a de facto dominant position of the Russian Federation in the EU gas market. The study of the transportation aspect of energy security of the EU has become a particularly relevant subject since the escalation of the political crisis in Ukraine in 2014-2016. In the current circumstances, there remain uncertainties regarding the prospects of the Russian gas deliveries to the EU countries through the territory of Ukraine and, in consequence, the question of transportation, as a component of the gas market, has become one of the most important on the agenda of the EU on the subject of cooperation with Russia. The problem of energy security becomes even more acute due to the actions of energy companies of the exporting countries, seeking to obtain access to the gas end-user and attempting to acquire equity shares in companies involved in transportation and sales. These attempts are met with resistance on the part of the supranational agencies of the EU, which is reflected in the adoption of relevant legislative acts. The prospects for maintaining gas exports from Russia are significantly influenced by the vigorous actions of the EU countries on the implementation of energy-efficient technologies and the wider use of renewable sources of energy. Thus, the analysis of potential changes in the strategy of the EU countries in the context of contemporary trends for strengthening the energy security in the gas market is particularly important for improving the export strategy of Russia in this market.
Downloads
References
See: “BP Statistical Review of World Energy,” June 2014 // BP, available at [http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/
xcel/Energy-Economics/statistical-review-2014/BP-Statis-tical_Review_of_world_energy_2014_workbook.xlsx].
See: B. Akhmetova, I. Karabulatova, P. Dudin, Zh. Dorzhiev, “Tension around the Problem of the South China Sea as a Factor of Geopolitical Confrontation and Transformation of the Present World Order,” Central Asia and the Caucasus,Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2016, pp. 49-58; A. Shadzhe, I. Karabulatova, R. Khunagov, Z. Zhade, “Ethnopolitical InÀuence in Regulat-ing National Security in Border Territories of the Countries in the Caucasian-Caspian Region,” Central Asia and the Caucasus,Vol. 17, Issue 3, 2016, pp. 66-75.
See: M.S. Golovina, “Energeticheskaia bezopasnost—aspekty, printsipy, opredelenia,” Nadezhnost i bezopasnost energetiki, No. 1 (20), 2013, pp. 12-17; Energetika i geopolitika, ed. by V.V. Kostyuk, A.A. Makarov, Russian Academy of Sciences, Nauka Publishers, Moscow, 2011, p. 92.
F. Proedrou, EU Energy Security in the Gas Sector: Evolving Dynamics, Policy Dilemmas and Prospects, Ashgate,Farnham, 2012, p. 4.
See: A.F. Alhaji, “What is Energy Security?” Energy Politics, Vol. IV, 2008, pp. 62-82.
See: T.L. Karl, The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and the Petro-States, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 1997, 343 pp.; Natural Resources and Violent ConÀict: Options and Actions, ed. by I. Bannon, P. Collier,World Bank, Washington, DC., 2003, 429 pp., available at [https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/15 047/282450Natural0resources0violent0conÀict.pdf?seq uence=1]; P. Collier, The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done about It, Oxford University Press, New York, 2008, 211 pp.
The paradox of plenty is a phenomenon in the economy, associated with the fact that countries with signi¿cant natural resources are, as is often considered, economically less developed than countries with small stocks or with no stocks of energy resources.
“European Energy Security Strategy,” in: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Brussels, 2014, p. 3 [http://ec.europa.eu/energy/doc/20140528_energy_security_communication.pdf].
See: EU Energy in Figures— Statistical Pocketbook 2014, European Commission, Brussels, 2014, p. 26, available at [http://ec.europa.eu/energy/publications/doc/2014_pocketbook.pdf].
See: EU Energy Trends to 2030, European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, Luxembourg, 2010, p. 31,available at [http://ec.europa.eu/energy/observatory/trends_2030/doc/trends_to_2030_update_2009.pdf].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
