TRADITIONAL VALUES AS A NATIONAL SECURITY FACTOR IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION
Abstract
The authors have undertaken an in-depth investigation of traditional values as factors of national security of states in the age of globalization and the changes in the axiological system of society and value orientations of its members, caused by globalization. The authors relied on a wide spectrum of methodological and theoretical approaches, used in philosophy, political science, sociology, and globalistics. In the context of the unfolding civilizational evolution, globalization can be described as a relatively recent and, at the same time, highest development stage of the familiar process of internationalization (transnationalization) of many aspects of social life. In the last thirty-odd years, globalization has been unfolding as cultural and axiological impacts of Westernization and expansion of Western values to non-Western countries. In many cases, the destroyed traditional values and traditional foundations of life activities are not replaced with adequate axiological principles of development and modernization. The branching off of contemporary culture into two directions (globalization and regionalization) can be felt at all levels and, according to the present authors, have already created two paradoxes—preservation of the cultural heritage and coexistence of cultures. In Russia, globalization is spreading the easiest in the sphere, affected by the motives and symbols of material consumption. The multiplying signs of inefficiency of state regulation in market economy and the widening gap between the rich and poor can be considered as another powerful impetus for the spread of globalization. On the other hand, the fact that the traditional values are gaining popularity is the most important evidence that in Russia globalization is negatively assessed. In the epoch of globalization, traditional values keep the flood of unification and homogenization within certain limits.
Downloads
References
See: U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage, London, 1992, 260 pp.
See: V.V. Kotlyarova, A.M. Roudenko, M.M. Shubina, Y.A. Shestakov, “Explication of the Methodological Dif¿cul-ties of Modern Axiology,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2015, p. 478.
V.V. Kotlyarova, Tsennosti: traditsii i aksiologicheskaia paradigma sovremennosti, Monograph, GOU VPO YuR-GUES, Shakhty, 2009, p. 16.
See: V.Zh. Kelle, “Protsessy globalizatsii i dinamika kultury,” available at [http://www.zpu-journal.ru/zpu/2005_1/
elle/9.pdf].
See: F. Jameson, Valences of the Dialectic, Chapter 17 “Globalization as a Philosophical Issue,” Verso, London, New York, 2009, pp. 435-455.
See: G. Soros, The Crisis of Global Capitalism, Open Society Endangered, Public Affairs, 1998, 245 pp.
See: “Lichnoe blagopoluchie vs. velichie strany,” Press release, LEVADA-TSENTR, 14 December, 2016, available at [http://www.levada.ru/2016/12/14/lichnoe-blagopoluchie-vs-velichie-strany/].
H. Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, Second edition, Beacon Press, 1991, p. 9.
See: V.V. Kotlyarova, Dinamika tsennostey molodezhi Rossii v postsovetskiy period, PhD thesis, Rostov State Uni-versity, Rostov on Don, 2005, p. 87.
See: V.V. Kotlyarova, “Traditsionnye tsennosti v sovremennoy kulture,” Istoricheskie,¿losofskie, politicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki, kulturologiia i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, No. 1 (5), 2010, pp. 84-86.
See: A.M. Roudenko, V.V. Kotlyarova, M.M. Shubina, “Philosophical Analysis of the Values InÀuence of the West-ern World in the Socio-Cultural Space of Russia,” Paradigmata poznání, No. 1, 2015, pp. 20-27.
See: “Rodina—eto zvuchit gordo!” VTsIOM, Press release, No. 3201, 16 September, 2016, available at [https://
ciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115866].
See: V.V. Kotlyarova, Dinamika tsennostey…, p. 87; “Problemniy fon strany: itogi goda,” VTsIOM, Press release,No. 3277, 28 December, 2016, available at [http://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116014].
See: S. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Touchstone Books, 1997, 357 pp.
See: “SShA i Rossia: otsutstvie doveria i oshchushchenie bezopasnosty opredeliaiut otnoshenia stran,” Press release,LEVADA-TSENTR, 7 November, 2016, available at [http://www.levada.ru/cp/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/USA_Russia_
evada_Chicago-2016_rus.pdf].
See: V.A. Anikin, “Krizis i natsionalnoe samosoznanie rossiian,” Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: Ekonomi-cheskie i sotsialnye peremeny, No. 5, 2016, p. 207.
See: World Economic Forum. Global Risks 2017, available at [https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2017].
See: S.I. Samygin, A.M. Rudenko, V.V. Kotlyarova, “Istoriko-¿losofskoe osmyslenie problemy informatsionnoy bezopasnosti,” Sotsium i vlast, No. 2 (58), 2016, pp. 47-51.
See: V.V. Kotlyarova, Chelovek i ego potrebnosti, Teaching aid, ISOiP (branch) DGTU, Shakhty, Lik, Novocherkassk,2016, p. 131.
See: A. Rudenko, V. Kotlyarova, E. Polozhenkova, M. Shubina, Yu. Shestakov, G. Mogilevskaya, O. Sysoeva, “Re-ligious Tolerance as a Factor of Spiritual Security in the South of Russia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, Issue 2,2016, рp. 37-46.
A. Giddens, Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives, Routledge, 2003, pp. 12-13.
See: O.V. Zernetskaya, Globalnoe razvitie system massovoy kommunikatsii i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, Prosvesh-chenie, Moscow, 2009, p. 351.
See: M. McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, McGrow-Hill, 1964, 318 pp.
See: Rossia v dialoge kultur, ed. by A.A. Guseynov, A.V. Smirnov, B.O. Nikolaichev, Nauka Publishers, Moscow,2010, p. 48.
See: E.W. Said, Culture and Imperialism, Vintage Books, New York, 1993, p. XXV.
See: Th. Friedman, The Lexus and the Olive Tree. Understanding Globalization, Picador, 2000, p. 295.
See: G.G. Diligenskiy, “Globalizatsia v chelovecheskom izmerenii,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosh-enia, No. 7, 2002, pp. 4-15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.