POLITICAL ORIENTATIONS OF THE YOUTH IN TAJIKISTAN,UZBEKISTAN AND KAZAKHSTAN
Abstract
The political systems of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan are complicated and heterogeneous public structures, undergoing difficult and contradictory processes of transformation of all basic institutions, norms, and principles of relationships between themselves and society. Students play a crucial role in this process, which explains why the states want to offer the best possible conditions for the younger generation to help realize its potential in the interests of the state. This dictates changing the system designed to work with young people at all levels of power, as well as the mechanisms of governance. It was not by chance that the youth of these republics has been selected for the studies of political processes unfolding in these republics: young people are normally very critical of political education and training. Young people, due to the high educational level and socio-political activity and dynamic social behavior, will replace, in the near future, the main productive and intellectual public force.
However, today there are no adequately developed methodological approaches to the conceptualization of students as a social group and objects of social and political analysis, which means that we should carefully study the experience, problems, and developmental issues in the process of transformation of contemporary post-Soviet society in Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan. All aspects of the content and manifestations of political orientations in the youth milieu are being actively discussed in academic writings. Yet, the phenomenon of political orientation—the problem of inner belonging to any specific social and political group, a correct understanding of its role in the life of the entire society, the means of forming ideas about oneself as a member of a definite social and political force—was and remains a challenge.
Downloads
References
See: I. Karabulatova, I. Mkrtumova, Z. Polivara, B. Akhmetova, S. Galiullina, E. Loskutova, E. Abylkasymov, “Pro-test Behavior of Present-Day Russian Youth as Ethnosocial Deviation in an Ethnopolitical ConÀict-Prone Situation,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 94-103; I. Mkrtumova, I. Karabulatova, A. Zinchenko, “Political Extremism of the Youth as an Ethnosocial Deviation in the Post-Soviet Electronic Information Society,” Central Asia and the Caucasus,Vol. 17, Issue 4, 2016, рр. 79-87.
See: Statistichesky sbornik sfery obrazovania Respubliki Tadzhikistan, Dushanbe, 2014, pp. 235-238.
For the list of Kazakhstan’s education institutions, see [http://edurk.kz/ru/349-spisok_vuzov_kazahstana.html], 1 Feb-ruary, 2017.
For the educational institutions of Uzbekistan, see [http://univer.in/vuzy-respubliki-uzbekistan], 1 February, 2017.
See: “Molodeiushchee litso kazakhstanskikh protestov,” available at [http://rus.azattyq.org/a/almaty-week-and-pro-tests-tenge-devaluation/25265768.html], 22 February, 2017.
See: V.F. Penkov, Politicheskaia kultura kak faktor razvitiia politicheskogo protsessa v sovremnnoy Rossii, Ph.D. thesis 23.00.02; defended on 21.06.2002; approved 14.02.2002, Moscow, 2002. 381 pp. Bibliography, pp. 355-381. p. 93.
See: I. Mkrtumova, A. Dosanova, I. Karabulatova, V. Nifontov, “The Use of Communication Technologies to Oppose Political-Religious Terrorism as an Ethnosocial Deviation in the Contemporary Information-Digital Society,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 54-61.
See: E.A. Samsonova, Politicheskie tsennosti rossiyskoy molodezhi v usloviiakh sotsialno-politicheskikh transfor-matsiy 1990-kh godov; author’s synopsis of Ph.D. thesis, 23.00.02. Saratov, 2008. 24 pp.
See: I. Karabulatova, I. Mkrtumova, Z. Polivara, B. Akhmetova, S. Galiullina, E. Loskutova, E. Abylkasymov, op. cit.
See: A.S. Zaynalabidova, V.V. Chernous, Politicheskiy ekstremizm i ego pro¿laktika u studencheskoy molodezhi Dona, Rostov on Don, 2002; V.V. Kasyanov, Politicheskaia sotsializatsia molodezhi v sovremennoy Rossii, author’s synopsis of doctorate thesis, Rostov on Don, 1999; M.Yu. Nesmelova, Politicheskoe povedenie molodezhi v sovremnnoy Rossii,author’s synopsis of Ph.D. thesis, Kazan, 1995; V. Plotnikova, Politicheskoe povedenie v Rossii, Rostov on Don, 2004;V.M. Utenkov, A.S. Zakalin, “O politicheskom soznanii studencheskoy molodezhi,” Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiia, 2003,No. 2; T.F. Alekseenko, Protsess smeny sotsialnoy identichnosti rossiiskogo studenchestva, author’s synopsis of Ph.D. thesis,Rostov on Don, 2005.
See: T.V. Pavlova, “Analyz sotsiokulturnogo i istoricheskogo konteksta sotsialnykh dvizheniy,” Abstract of the Re-port at the 3rd All-Russia Sociological Congress, available at [http://www.isras.ru/abstract_bank/1210250425.pdf], 7 Febru-ary, 2016; Yu.V. Ivanova, V.A. Krikunova, “Tendentsii i mekhanizmy vozdeystviia molodezhnoy politicheskoy kultury na politicheskiy protsess,” Vestnik Zabaykalskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, No. 4, 2012, pp. 48-55.
See: Yu. Komlyakova, “Democratization in Post-Soviet Central Asia: American Impact,” Central Asia and the Cau-casus, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 120-129.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.