NEW SILK ROAD: OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS FOR CENTRAL ASIA (A VIEW FROM KAZAKHSTAN)

Authors

  • Amina AUBAKIROVA D.Sc. (Geography), Professor in Economics of he Higher Attestation Commission of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan; rofessor at the Department of Economics, chool of Economics and Management, Narxoz University Joint Stock Company (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author
  • Samazhan UMIRZAKOV D.Sc. (Econ.), Professor, Dean of the School of Economics and Management, arxoz University Joint Stock Company (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author
  • Nurakhmet AITENOV MA in International Relations, Top Expert of the School of Economics and Management,Narxoz University Joint Stock Company (Almaty, Kazakhstan) Author

Abstract

In connection with the Chinese project One Belt, One Road, the article deals with geopolitical aspects of the ways of its implementation. The focus is on the participation of Kazakhstan and the post-Soviet countries of Transcaucasia and Central Asia in the project. Highlighted are the geopolitical interests of Russia and China, Turkey and Iran, as well as the extra-regional powers—the European Union and the United States. An attempt is made to outline new threats and risks for the region in connection with the building of the New Silk Road. Contributors represent their point of view mainly through the prism of the interests of Kazakhstan. 

After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the geopolitical position of the republics of Central Asia and Kazakhstan proved to be extremely difficult. All of them are located in the depths of the largest continent—Eurasia, away from sea routes. In the last two centuries, being part of the Russian Empire and then the U.S.S.R., these republics were perceived by the world community as the backward provinces of the two empires.

For many centuries, the region was situated along the Great Silk Road and served as a link between the West and East. Many medieval cities in Southern Kazakhstan and Central Asia emerged due to its existence. Today, the modern tourist value of these cities is, in many respects, connected with preserved objects of the Silk Road. The obsolescence of the region as a link between East and West was caused by the opening of maritime communications. Additionally, the rupture of these links was influenced by ideological reasons from the Russian Empire and later the Soviet Union.

Despite the disruption of ties with the outside world, the region maintained its distinctive identity during the Soviet period. In recent times, being positioned between two strong states—Russia and China—and the Islamic world, particularly Turkey and Iran, post-Soviet Central Asia has experienced significant political and civilizational influence from these countries. The realization of membership in the Turkic-Muslim culture, the influence of China, strong post-Soviet traditions, and the search for national identity all contribute to a complex fusion in the region's modern history.

The revival of the Great Silk Road raises questions about the region's place in the world community. Will Central Asia remain within the post-Soviet space under the strong influence of Russia, become a commodity appendage of China, or endeavor to reconnect with its Turko-Muslim roots? These questions will shape the future trajectory of the region and its geopolitical significance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

V. Elisseeff, The Silk Roads: Highways of Culture and Commerce, Berghahn Dooks, New York, 2000, p. 258.

See: Rating of the Countries of the World Based on the Level of Gross National Income Per Capita, Humanitarian Technology: Information and Analytical Portal, 30 October, 2016, available in Russian at [http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/rating-countries-gni/rating-countries-gni-info], 11 June, 2017.

See: The Directive of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan on 25 December, 2012, No. 231-r “On Ap-proval of the Comprehensive Plan of Action for the Implementation of the Project “Kazakhstan—The New Silk Road”, The Adilet Republican Center of Legal Information of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, available in Russian at [http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/R1200000231], 15 June, 2017.

See: The Nurly Jol State Program for Infrastructure Development for 2015-2019, National Control Holding Baiterek,available in Russian at [http://www.baiterek.gov.kz/ru/activities/state-programs/nurly-zhol/], 15 June, 2017.

T. Shadrina, “Ot Evropy do Kitaia prolozhat dorogu,” Rossiiskaia gazeta RG.RU, 18 March, 2013, available at [http://

ww.rg.ru/2013/03/18/doroga-site.html], 22 May, 2017.

S. Pale, “Kirghizia i kitaiskiy ‘Novy Shelkovy put,” Novoe Vostochnoe obozrenie NEO, 3 September, 2015, available at [http://ru.journal-neo.org/2015/09/03/kirgiziya-i-kitajskij-novy-j-shelkovy-j-put/], 27 May, 2017.

V. Kuriatov, “ShOS-2016: vyzovy i perspektivy,” Kazakhstanskaia pravda, 25 June, 2016, available at [http://www.

azpravda.kz/articles/view/shos-2016-vizovi-i-perspektivi1], 24 May, 2017.

Quoted from: A. Timofeenko, “Zheleznaia doroga Kitai-Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan, Voprosy bez otvetov,” Vecherniy Bishkek, 4 February, 2013, available at [http://stanradar.com/news/full/503-zheleznaja-doroga-kitaj-kyrgyzstan-uzbekistan-riski-i-vygody.html], 27 May, 2017.

J. Engvall, Flirting with State Failure: Power and Politics in Kyrgyzstan since Independence, A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, Washington, D.C., 2011, p. 18.

“Iran obeshchaet predstavit proekt zheleznoi dorogi cherez Tadzhikistan cherez tri mesiatsa,” Iran.ru: Russian Infor-mation Agency, 12 May, 2012, available at [http://www.iran.ru/news/economics/80454/Iran_ obeshchaet_predstavit_pro-ekt_zheleznou_dorogi_czerez_Tadzhikistan_cherez_tri_mesyaca], 3 June, 2017.

V. Tsepliaev, “Kitai v Si mazhore: Chemu Rossia mozhet pouchitsia u vostochnogo soseda,”Argumenty i fakty,No. 13, 2013, p. 7.

See: D. Tang, “China Bans Ramadan Fast for Muslims in Northwest,” The Telegraph, 3 July, 2014, available at [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/10942493/China-bans-Ramadan-fast-in-Muslim-northwest.html],10 July, 2017.

See: N. Beauchamp-Mustafaga, “Dispatch from Beijing: PLA Writi 14 M. Overchenko, “Kak Kitai otvoevyvaet u Rossii Tsentralnuiu Aziiu,” Vedomosti, 25 October, 2015, available at [http://www.vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2015/10/26/614254-kitai-aziyu-rossii#/galleries/140737492479880/ normal/1],22 June, 2017.

D. Kang, China Rising: Peace, Power and Order in East Asia, Columbia University Press, New York, 2007, p. 296.

E. Zicheng, Geopolitika i diplomatia Kitaia, Peking, 1998, pp. 9-13.

T. Fallon, “The New Silk Road: Xi Jinping’s Grand Strategy for Eurasia,” American Foreign Policy Interests, Vol. 37,Issue 3, 2015, pp. 140-147.

T. Summers, “China’s ‘New Silk Roads’: Sub-National Regions and Networks of Global Political Economy,” Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue 9, 2016, pp. 1628-1643.

V. Kolossov, R. Turovsky, “Russian Geopolitics at the Fin-de-siècle,” Geopolitics, Vol. 6, Issue 1, 2001, pp. 141-164.

S. Rogov, “Kontury novoi rossiiskoi strategii,” Nezavisimaia gazeta: Stsenarii, No. 3, 1998, pp. 14-15.ngs on the New Silk Road,” China Brief, No. 15,2015, p. 1.

See: G.I. Chufrin, Rossia v Tsentralnoi Azii, KISI, Almaty, 2010, 220 pp.

V. Inozemtsev, “Tranzitnoi strany iz Rossii uzhe ne vyidet,” Vedomosti, 29 November, 2012, available at [https://

ww.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2012/11/29/tranzita_ne_vyjdet].

I. Zuenko, S. Zuban, “Transkontinentalnyi transit Aziia-Evropa,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia,No. 7, 2016, pp. 70-76.

See: AO “OTLK” website, available at [http://www.utlc.com/], 14 June, 2017.

See: TRACECA website, available at [http://www.traceca-org.org/ru/glavnaja/], 14 June, 2017.

See: INOGATE website, available at [http://www.inogate.org/?lang=ru], 14 June, 2017.

B. Volkhonskiy, “Pererozhdenie ‘novoi Evropy’,” Russkii zhurnal, 25 November, 2008, available at [http://www.

uss.ru/pole/Pererozhdenie-novoj-Evropy], 25 June, 2017.

T. Fallon, op. cit.

E. İşeri, “The U.S. Grand Strategy and the Eurasian Heartland in the Twenty-First Century,” Geopolitics, Vol. 14,Issue 1, 2009, pp. 26-46.

W. Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, Pluto Press, London, 2004,pp. 246-247.

V.G. Korgun, “Vyvod voisk SShA/NATO iz Afganistana: problemy i vyzovy,” in: Afganistan i Pakistan: sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy razvitia (po materialam soveshchania, sostoiavshegosia v Tsentre izuchenia stran Blizhnego i Srednego Vostoka), Moscow, 2012, p. 27.

S. Enaleev, “Astaninskii klub: dialog o budushchem Tsentralnoi Azii,” Kazakhstanskaia pravda, 28 October, 2016,available at [http://www.kazpravda.kz/fresh/view/astaninskii-klub-dialog-o-budushchem-tsentralnoi-evrazii/], 16 June, 2017.

D. Brewster, “Silk Roads and Strings of Pearls: The Strategic Geography of China’s New Pathways in the Indian Ocean,” Geopolitics, Vol. 22, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 269-291.

G. Malykh, “Sozdaetsia perspektivnyi marshrut,” Kazakhstanskaia pravda, 10 March, 2016, available at [http://www.

azpravda.kz/fresh/view/sozdaetsya-perspektivnii-marshrut/], 17 June, 2017.

See: V.V. Naumkin, Gody, kotorye izmenili Tsentralnuiu Aziiu, TsSPI-IV, RAS, Moscow, 2009, p. 331.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-31

Issue

Section

ECONOMICS AND ENERGY POLICY

How to Cite

AUBAKIROVA, A., UMIRZAKOV, S., & AITENOV, N. (2017). NEW SILK ROAD: OPPORTUNITIES AND THREATS FOR CENTRAL ASIA (A VIEW FROM KAZAKHSTAN). CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 18(4), 07-20. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1390

Plaudit