ENERGY POLICIES IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS

Authors

  • Larisa ALEKSANYAN Research Associate, Department of Political Science and Political Philosophy,Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Svetlana GAVRILOVA Ph.D. (Hist.), Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science and Political Philosophy,Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author

Abstract

The Southern Caucasus continues to be a major focus of attention. Its unique geographical location and geopolitical importance are enhanced by its substantial hydrocarbon reserves. A key role in the region’s energy sector is played by Azerbaijan, which has achieved significant successes. Pipeline projects implemented in the early 21st century have enabled Azerbaijan to become an exporter of Caspian oil and gas to the European market. Western energy companies and government structures have played a major part in this process, providing financial assistance and political support for the new pipeline projects. Their involvement in creating alternative routes for oil and gas transportation from the Caspian region has increased the role of Georgia, since export pipelines run through its territory. At the same time, Armenia was excluded from the discussion of energy projects owing to political factors. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and close relations with Russia in the 1990s became an obstacle to its participation in new pipeline projects. In the last decade, the energy situation in the Southern Caucasus has changed radically. The implementation of pipeline projects initiated by Western countries has strengthened the position of Azerbaijan and Georgia, creating conditions for the development of new projects. At the same time, Baku is no longer oriented only towards Western countries, but has expanded its cooperation with Turkey. The energy factor has played a key role in strengthening the Turkish-Azerbaijani tandem, paving the way for its expansion to include Georgia. This triple alliance, in which Turkey holds the leading position, has allowed Ankara to significantly expand its presence in the Southern Caucasus and to increase its influence on the political, economic, and cultural development of Azerbaijan and Georgia. New pipeline projects involving Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey are to be implemented in the next few years. This will open a new page in the energy history of the Southern Caucasus. However, it should be emphasized that in recent years Azerbaijan has met with some difficulties in oil and gas production. This fact rules out the possibility of stronger competition between Russia and Azerbaijan for the European market in the coming years. Nevertheless, the sphere of oil and gas production and export in the Southern Caucasus will have a crucial effect on the development of the region, so that it will remain a focus of attention in the foreign policy of non-regional states.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: S.S. Zhiltsov, “Russia’s Policy towards the Pipeline Transport in the Caspian Region: Results and Prospects,” in: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 51, 2016, pp. 85-94.

See: I.V. Prokofiev, “Toplivno-energeticheskii kompleks,” in: Gruzia: problemy i perspektivy razvitiia, in two vols., Vol. 1, ed. by E.M. Kozhokin, Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, Moscow, 2001, pp. 38-39.

See: V.P. Vasyutovich, “Mesto Armenii v geopolitike SShA,” in: Armenia: problemy nezavisimogo razvitiia, ed. by E.M. Kozhokin, Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, Moscow, 1998, pp. 370-371.

See: S.S. Zhiltsov, I.S. Zonn, A.M. Ushkov, Geopolitika Kaspiiskogo regiona, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, Moscow, 2003, p. 123.

See: A.A. Kurtov, “Kaspiiski spor: otnosheniia Azerbaidzhana s Turkmenistanom,” in: Nezavisimyi Azerbaidzhan: novye oriyentiry, in two vols., Vol. 2, ed. by E.M. Kozhokin, Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, Moscow, 2001, pp. 76-77.

See: S.S. Zhiltsov, I.S. Zonn, Kaspiiskaia truboprovodnaia geopolitika. Sostoianie i realizatsiia, Vostok-Zapad, Moscow, 2011, 317 pp.

See: S. Zhiltsov, D. Slisovskiy, N. Shulenina, E. Bazhanov, “Azerbaijan’s Energy Policy: Results, Problems, Prospects,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 18, Issue 4, 2017, p. 20.

See: “Azərbaycanın neft strategiyası (The Oil Strategy of Azerbaijan),” Heydər Əliyev İrsini Araşdırma Mərkəzi (Heydar Aliyev Heritage Research Center), available at [http://aliyevheritage.org/az/oilstrategy.html], 28 December 2018.

Z. Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Washington, D.C., 1997, p. 129.

See: S. Zhiltsov, D. Slisovskiy, N. Shulenina, E. Bazhanov, op. cit., p. 24.

See: “Azerbaijan Republic: Selected Issues and Statistical Appendix,” IMF Country Report, May 2003, No. 3/130, p. 11.

See: A. Guryev, Geopoliticheskiy rakurs nefteprovoda Baku-Tbilisi-Dzheikhan, Institute of the Middle East, 19 June 2005, available at [http://www.iimes.ru/rus/stat/2005/19-06-05.htm], 27 August 2018.

See: V ozhidanii buri: Yuzhnyi Kavkaz, ed. by K.V. Makiyenko, Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST), Moscow, 2018, 200 pp.

See: Republic of Azerbaijan: 2016 Article IV Consultation—Press Release; Staff Report; and Informational Annex, IMF Country Report, No. 16/296, September 2016, p. 4.

See: N. Vidadili, E. Suleymanov, C. Mahmudlu, “Transition to Renewable Energy and Sustainable Energy Development in Azerbaijan,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 80 (C), 2017, p. 1153.

See: I. Ibragimov, Strategiia effektivnogo vliianiia: vneshniaia politika, “myagkaia sila” i energeticheskaia diplomatiia Azerbaidzhana v XXI veke, Moscow, 2016, p. 47.

See: S. Zhiltsov, “Energy Flows in Central Asia and the Caspian Region: New Opportunities and New Challenges,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 15, Issue 4, 2014, p. 73.

See: S. Pirani, Let’s Not Exaggerate: Southern Gas Corridor Prospects to 2030 // The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, July 2018, p. 8.

See: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2018, 67th edition, p. 26.

See: Country Analysis Brief: Azerbaijan, U.S. Energy Information Administration, 22 June 2016, p. 8.

See: Uglubleniye Rossiisko-Turetskikh otnoshenii: doklad, ed. by A.V. Kortunov, E. Ershen, Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), Moscow, 2018, 128 pp.

See: I.S. Zonn, S.S. Zhiltsov, A.V. Semenov, “Export of Hydrocarbons from Turkmenistan: Results and Perspectives,” in: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 51, pp. 125-137.

See: A. Cohen, “Caspian Gas, TANAP and TAP in Europe’s Energy Security,” Istituto Affari Internazionali—IAI Working papers, 14 April 2014, 17 pp.

See: F. Umbach, S. Raszewski, Strategic Perspectives for Bilateral Energy Cooperation between the EU and Kazakhstan: Geo-Economic and Geopolitical Dimensions in Competition with Russia and China’s Central Asia Policies, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 2016, 70 pp.

See: I.S. Zonn, S.S. Zhiltsov, “Oil and Gas Production in the Black Sea Shelf,” in: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 51, pp. 51-65.

See: Energy Balance of Georgia 2017, National Statistics Office of Georgia, available at [http://geostat.ge/?action=page&&p_id=2916&lang=eng], 3 January 2019.

See: Ten-Year Development Plan for Georgian Gas Transmission Network 2018-2027, Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation, October 2017, p. 19.

See: V.S. Davtian, “Rol energeticheskikh kompanii na Yuzhnom Kavkaze” in: Postsovetskoe prostranstvo: rol vneshnego faktora, Collected articles, ed. by A.B. Krylov, A.V. Kuznetsov, G.I. Chufrin, IMEMO RAN, Moscow, 2018, pp. 215-225.

See: E.M. Kuzmina, “Rossiisko-Gruzinski dialog v deistvii,” in: Rossia-Gruzia. Otnosheniia: energetika, ekonomika, bezopasnost, geopolitika, migratsiia i kul’tura, ed. by N. Tsikhistavi-Khuchishvili, I.N. Timofeyev, M. Areshidze, T.A. Makhmutov, Damani, Tbilisi, 2018, pp. 24-32.

See: Social-Economic Development Strategy of Georgia “GEORGIA 2020”, Government of Georgia, 2015, p. 31.

See: Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission. Report on Activities of 2017, p. 10.

See: World Energy Trilemma Index 2018, World Energy Council, pp. 15-16.

See: D. Gasparian, “Rol rossiisko-armianskogo partnerstva v sfere obespecheniia energeticheskoi bezopasnosti Respubliki Armenia,” Istoriia, sotsiologiia, politologiia, 2008, p. 83.

See: Prezident Ilkham Aliyev: My izolirovali Armeniiu or vsekh regionalnykh proyektov, 1News.az, 10 July 2018, available at [http://www.1news.az/news/sostoyalos-zasedanie-kabineta-ministrov-azerbaydzhana], 27 December 2018.

See: E.A. Visulkina, G.N. Rozhkov, I.P. Azyukov, “Sotorudnichestvo stran YeAES v energeticheskoi sfere,” All-Russia Scientific Conference “Ensuring National Security in the Context of Eurasian Integration,” 15 March 2017, p. 39.

See: Armenia: Country Overview, International Energy Agency, available at [http://www.eu4energy.iea.org/countries/Armenia], 24 January 2018.

See: S.A. Gevorkian, O.S. Avagian, V.Z. Marukhian, A.A. Gevorkian,

Downloads

Published

2019-02-28

Issue

Section

ENERGY PROJECTS AND ENERGY POLICY

How to Cite

ALEKSANYAN, L., & GAVRILOVA, S. (2019). ENERGY POLICIES IN THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 20(1), 07-24. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1409

Plaudit