THE YOUTH OF KAZAKHSTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL ACTIVISM
Abstract
Studies of youth political activism are highly topical because, first, political involvement is an inalienable part of the political system, social and political institutions, and the level of political culture. The political involvement of the younger generation determines, to a great extent, the efficiency of social, economic, and political reforms and the country’s future. Secondly, at the turn of the twenty-first century, young people played an especially prominent role in the protests that shook North African and Middle Eastern countries. These protests led to regime changes and the so-called color revolutions of the spring of 2011. In many countries, protest movements are used or misused by destructive radical forces. Thirdly, discussions of the nature and level of youth political activism pushed the problem to the forefront of political science. On the one hand, researchers note the low level of political activism of the younger generation, which looks apolitical and is gradually losing interest in politics. On the other hand, the forms of political activism are becoming more numerous and gradually acquiring new forms; information technologies play a new, previously unknown role and influence the political behavior of the younger generation to a much greater extent than before. This means that to identify and analyze the causes and factors that led to new forms and trends in youth political activism, we should rely on conceptual approaches and scholarly methods of study.
We have selected Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan as the subjects of our studies because they are coping with more or less identical political problems and yet demonstrate certain peculiarities in the functioning of their political systems and methods of ensuring stability. We have identified the role of youth in political processes, its attitude toward current social, economic, and political events, and the ways in which the younger generation influences political decision-making in the corridors of power.
Downloads
References
M. Lynch, The Arab Uprisings Explained. New Contentious Politics in the Middle East, New York, 2014, 340 pp.;A. Vasiliev, N. Petrov, Retsepty Arabskoy vesny. Russkaya versiya, Moscow, 2012, 301 pp; Major R.E. Barnsby, Social Media and the Arab Spring: How Facebook, Twitter, and Camera Phones Changed the Egyptian Army’s Response to Revolution,Lexington, Kentucky, 2015, 60 рp.
S. Verba, N.H. Nie, Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, Harper & Row, New York, 1972.
L.W. Milbrath, M.L. Goel, Political Participation, 2nd edition, United Press of America, Maryland, 1977, p. 2.
R.D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000,p. 168.
J. Ekman, E. Amnå, “Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards a New Typology,” Human Affairs, Vol. 22,2012, p. 287.
M. Lipset, Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics, Doubleday and Company, New York, 1960.
D. Collier, S. Levitsky, “Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Poli-tics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 1997, pp. 430-451.
G. O’Donnell, P. Schmitter, Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democra-cies, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986, 81 pp.
F.F. Piven, R.A. Cloward, Why Americans Don’t Vote, Pantheon Books, New York, 1988, p. 35.
A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Row, New York, 1957, p. 260.
M.N. Franklin, Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004, 250 pp.
T.J. Fedderson, “Rational Choice and the Paradox of not Voting,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 18,No. 1, 2004, pp. 99-113.
H. Catt, “Now or Never: The Impact of Political Education on Civic Participation,” Australasian Political Studies Conference, Dunedin (New Zealand), 2005, 9 pp.
A. Campbell, G. Gurin, W. Miller, The Voter Decides, Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston, Illinois, 1954, p. 187.
R.G. Niemi, S.C. Craig, F. Mattei, “Measuring Internal Political Ef¿cacy in the 1988 National Election Study”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 4, 1991, pp. 1407-1412.
P.R. Abramson, J.H. Aldrich, “The Decline of Electoral Participation in America,” American Political Science Re-view, Vol. 76, 1982, pp. 502-521.
A. Acock, H. Clarke, M. Stewart, “A New Model for Old Measures: A Covariance Structure Analysis of Political Ef¿cacy,” Journal of Politics, Vol. 47, No. 4, 1985, pp. 1062-1084.
S.E. Finkel, “Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Ef¿cacy: A Panel Analysis,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1985, pp. 891-913.
R.E. Hero, C. Tolbert, “Minority Voices and Citizen Attitudes about Government Responsiveness in the American States: Do Social and Institutional Context Matter?” British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34, 2004, pp. 109-121.
S. Verba, K. Schlozman, H. Brady, Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1995, 664 pp.
S. Verba, N. Nie, Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality, Harper and Row, New York,1972, p. 2.
R.E. Wol¿nger, S.J. Rosenstone, Who Votes? Yale University Press, New Haven, 1980, 158 pp.
T. De Luca, The Two Faces of Political Apathy, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1995, 294 pp.
D. Campbell, “What is Education’s Impact on Civic and Social Engagement?” in: Symposium on Social Outcomes of Learning, Danish University of Education, Copenhagen, 23-24 March, 2006, 102 pp.
M. Jennings, R. Niemi, The Political Character of Adolescence: The InÀuence of Families and Schools, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1974, p. 5.
D. Glasberg, D. Shannon, Political Sociology: Oppression, Resistance, and the State, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, 2011, p. 56.
L. Powell, J. Cowart, Political Campaign Communication: Inside and Out, Allyn & Bacon Press, Boston MA, 2013,320 pp.
K. Varkey, Political Theory: An Indian Perspective, Indian Publishers Distributors, 2003, 424 pp.
T. Janowski, J. Wilson, “Pathways to Voluntarism: Family Socialization and Status Transmission”, Social Forces,Vol. 74, No. 1, 1995, pp. 271-292.
“70% kazakhstantsev imeiut dostup k Internetu,” Kazakhstanskaia pravda, 8 November, 2016, available at [https://
ww.kazpravda.kz/news/tehnologii/70-kazahstantsev-imeut-dostup-k-internetu—issledovanie], 5 September, 2018.
“Skolko polzovateley Interneta v KR? I skolko polzuiutsia sotssetiami?” Kaktus Media, 30 January, 2017 [https://
aktus.media/doc/351674_skolko_polzovateley_interneta_v_kr_i_skolko_polzyutsia_socsetiami.html], 5 September, 2018.
“Kak priviazat IMEI-kod telefona k IIN,” Today.kz, 17 May, 2018, available at [http://today.kz/news/gadzhetyi/2018-05-17/765765-kak-privyazat-imei-kod-telefona-k-iin], 5 September, 2018.
“Anonimnye kommentarii na saytakh zapretili v Kazakhstane,” Zakon.kz, 28 December, 2017, available at [https://
ww.zakon.kz/4896289-anonimnye-kommentarii-na-saytah.html], 5 September, 2018.
G. Nassimova, K. Smagulov, M. Buzurtanova, “Content Analysis of Students’ Internet Communication with Au-thorities and University Administrations to Study Problems of Kazakhstan Youth,” Vestnik Al-Farabi KazNU. Philosophy series. Cultural science series. Political science series, No. 2 (64), 2018, pp. 128-142.
S. Kilybayeva, G. Nassimova, A. Massalimova, “The Kazakhstani Youth Engagement in Politics”, Studies of Transi-tion States and Societies, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 2017, pp. 53-71.
A combination of words “slacker” and “activist”, which describes a person actively involved in political propaganda and publishes petitions in an effort to change the world while remaining in front of his computer.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
