EURASIAN CONTINENTAL INTEGRATION: PREREQUISITES AND DIFFICULTIES
Abstract
This study seeks to address underexplored issues in Eurasian continental integration, such as the impact of the continental (landlocked) location of vast inland territories on their economic development and possible ways to overcome transportation-economic difficulties within the framework of a Greater Eurasia. It notes the trend towards the progressive formation of this broad integration grouping on a continental scale and, based on a politico-economic understanding of the essence of the new bloc, determines its current composition, which mainly includes member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union and member and observer countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. The author considers the conceptual views of geopoliticians and geographers on the role and place of continental Eurasia in the world and examines the main prerequisites and difficulties of Eurasian continental integration. The study reveals a common geographical feature of the countries included in Greater Eurasia: the unique ultra-continental position of their inland regions, located, globally speaking, at the greatest distance from economical sea routes and major world markets. A case study of the Central Asian countries, Russia’s Siberia, and the western regions of China shows the negative impact of the ultra-continentality factor as manifested in increased transport costs, which creates serious barriers to economic growth and foreign trade activity. It is suggested that accelerated creation of latitudinal and meridional international transport corridors is a promising way to achieve greater economic consolidation of the inland regions of Greater Eurasia. The study highlights the new opportunities for the economic development of Russia’s ultra-continental macro-regions offered by Eurasian continental integration.
Downloads
References
See: K Velikomu okeanu—4: Povorot na Vostok. Predvaritelnye itogi i novye zadachi, ed. by T.V. Bordachev, MDK Valdai, Moscow, 2016, 36 pp.; K Velikomu okeanu—5: Ot povorota na Vostok k Bolshoi Evrazii, ed. by S.A. Karaganov, MDK Valdai, Moscow, 2017, 48 pp.
See: P.N. Savitsky, Kontinent Evrazia, Agraf, Moscow, 1997, 464 pp.; N.S. Trubetskoy, Nasledie Chingiskhana,Agraf, Moscow, 1999, 560 pp.
Ye.Yu. Vinokurov, A.M. Libman, “Dve evraziiskiye integratsii,” Voprosy ekonomiki, No. 2, 2013, pp. 47-72.
See: Z. Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books, 1997,xiv + 223 pp.
See: A.G. Dugin, Evraziiskiy revansh Rossii, Algoritm, Moscow, 2014, 256 pp.
See: I.F. Kefeli, D.I. Kuznetsov, Evraziiskiy vektor globalnoi politiki, Yurait Publishers, Moscow, 2018, 274 pp.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, “Geogra¿cheskiy smysl sozdaniia ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’,” Geogra¿ia i prirodnye resursy, No. 4,2018, pp. 5-14.
See: Ibidem.
See: H.J. Mackinder, Geogra¿cheskaia os istorii (The Geographical Pivot of History), in: A.G. Dugin, Osnovy geopolitiki. Geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii, Arktogeya, Moscow, 1997, pp. 491-506.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii, Geo Academic Publishers, Novosibirsk, 2008, 369 pp.
See: L. Hekimoglu, “Whither ‘Heartland’? Central Asia, Geography and Globalization,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 4 (34), 2005, pp. 66-80.
See: P.N. Savitsky, op. cit.
L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii.
P.N. Savitsky, op. cit.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii.
See: Ye.Yu. Vinokurov, A.M. Libman, op. cit.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, “Geogra¿cheskiy smysl sozdaniia ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’.”
See: L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii.
See: I.M. Mogilevkin, Globalnaia infrastruktura: mekhanizm dvizheniia v budushchee, Magistr, Moscow, 2010,317 pp.
See: L.B. Vardomsky, “Tranzitnyi potentsial Kazakhstana v kontekste evraziiskoi integratsii,” EKO, No. 8, 2015,pp. 59-78; L.A. Bezrukov, “Geogra¿cheskiy smysl sozdaniia ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’.”
See: L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii; idem,
Geogra¿cheskiy smysl sozdaniia ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’.”
See: L.A. Bezrukov, “Geogra¿cheski smysl sozdaniya ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’.”
See: S. Radelet, J.D. Sachs, Shipping Costs, Manufactured Exports, and Economic Growth, 1998, available at [http://
ww.earth.columbia.edu/site¿les/File/about/director/pubs/shipcost.pdf], 5 October, 2018; L. Annovazzi-Jakab, “Landlocked Countries: Opportunities, Challenges and Recommendations,” in: Trade Facilitation. The Challenges for Growth and Devel-opment, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2003, pp. 81-136; L. Hekimoglu, op. cit.; P. Collier, The Bottom Billion. Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It, Oxford University Press, New York, 2007, 205 pp.; C.
rigoriou, Landlockedness, Infrastructure and Trade: New Estimates for Central Asian Countries, The World Bank, Develop-ment Research Group Trade Team, Policy Research Working Paper 4335, August 2007, available at [http://documents.world-bank.org/curated/en/289461468016849336/pdf/wps4335.pdf], 5 October, 2018; K.D. White, “Geography, Policy, and Barriers to International Trade in Central Asia,” Central Asia Business Journal, 3 November, 2010, pp. 44-54, available at [https://
ww.researchgate.net/publication/306380017_Geography_Policy_and_Barriers_to_International_Trade_in_Central_Asia], 5 October, 2018.
See: K.D. White, op. cit.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, Kontinentalno-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regionalnom razvitii; T. Lopa-tina, I. Perechneva, “Otorvite gruz ot serdtsa,” Ekspert, No. 26, 2016, pp. 68-76.
See: L.A. Bezrukov, “Geogra¿cheskiy smysl sozdaniia ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’.”
See: J.D. Sachs, The End of Poverty. Economic Possibilities for Our Time, Penguin Books, New York, 2005, 448 pp.;Ye.N. Samburova, “Regionalnye disproportsii sovremennogo razvitiia ekonomiki Kitaia,” Vestnik MGU, Series 5, Geography,No. 4, 2014, pp. 49-55.
See: G.I. Khanin, “Ekonomicheskie programy i prognozy, ili manilovshchina i samoobman,” EKO, No. 4, 2006,pp. 2-19.
See: L.B. Vardomsky, op. cit.; L.A. Bezrukov, “Geogra¿cheskiy smysl sozdaniia ‘Bolshoi Evrazii’.”
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
