COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN AND CHINESE INTERESTS IN CENTRAL ASIA
Abstract
In addition to the recent violent ethnic conflict in Kyrgyzstan, some of the other events attracting attention to politics in Central Asia are the Georgian-Russian war, the Color Revolutions, the Andijan events in Uzbekistan, the Karimov government’s subsequent decision to end U.S. basing rights, Kazakhstan’s economic rise, and the leadership change in Turkmenistan. At the same time, the security situation in Afghanistan and the growing insecurity about energy supplies has heightened the interest in security and economic cooperation in Central Asia. Russia and China have been reacting to these same pressures.
On the one hand, they have reached a broad agreement on the priority of regime security and the need to limit the long-term military presence of the United States in Central Asia. On the other hand, their agreement and priorities should not be viewed as entirely cohesive. The divergent interests within the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), among the Central Asian states, and especially between Russia and China serve to limit any coordinated foreign policy toward Central Asia by the two powers.
This paper aims to establish a framework/background for a comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese policies on Central Asia based on a perspective that combines the interest-oriented realist school with value-driven or ideology-based foreign policymaking. To do that, I will first focus on those arguments that are most important for shaping foreign policy in the context of the growing pressure of globalization and the creation of new national identities and diverse constituencies. Second, I will compare the official state-sponsored values chosen by Russia and China in formulating their policies toward Central Asia. Third, I will look into how these state-sponsored values facilitate relations with Central Asia. Finally, I will examine the relationship between the states’ interests and official state values and evaluate the effectiveness of Russian and Chinese foreign policies in Central Asia, as well as the Central Asian reaction to the power play between these two rising nations in their region.
Downloads
References
For more comprehensive accounts of the changes and trends in international relations theories, see: St.M. Walt, "International Relations: One World, Many Theories," *Foreign Policy*, No. 110, Spring 1998; *The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics*, ed. by P.J. Katzenstein, Columbia University Press, New York, 1996; R.O. Keohane, J. Nye, "Transitional Relations and World Politics," *International Organization*, Vol. 25, No. 3, Summer 1971; T. Hopf, "The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory," *International Security*, Vol. 23, No. 1, Summer 1989; A. Wendt, *Social Theory of International Politics*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
See: J.K. Jacobsen, "Much Ado about Ideas: The Cognitive Factor in Economic Policy," *World Politics*, No. 47 (2), January 1995, pp. 283-310; A.S. Yee, "The Causal Effects of Ideas on Policies," *International Organization*, No. 50 (1), December 1996, pp. 69-108; L.H. Gelb, J.A. Rosenthal, "The Rise of Ethics in Foreign Policy," *Foreign Affairs*, May/June 2003, pp. 2-7.
For instance, see: D. Christian, *A History of Russia, Central Asia and Mongolia*, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1998; R. Foltz, *Religions of the Silk Road*, St. Martin’s Griffin, New York, 1996; M. Haghayeghi, *Islam and Politics in Central Asia*, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1996; S. Soucek, *A History of Inner Asia*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2000; Ch.W. Maynes, "America Discovers Central Asia," *Foreign Affairs*, No. 82 (2), March/April 2003, pp. 120-133.
See: D. Hoffman, "Iran’s Drive to Rebuild Seen Posing New Challenges to West," *The Washington Post*, 2 February, 1992; J. Nichol, *Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests*, CRS Report for Congress, 13 November, 2008.
See: Zb. Brzezinski, *The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives*, Basic Books, New York, 1997; M.P. Amineh, *Globalization, Geopolitics and Energy Security in Central Eurasia and the Caspian Region*, Clingendael International Energy Program, The Hague, 2003; S. Cunnings, *Oil, Transition and Security in Central Asia*, Routledge Curzon, New York, 2003; R. Legvold, "Greater Power Stakes in Central Asia," in: *Thinking Strategically: The Major Powers, Kazakhstan, and the Central Asian Nexus*, ed. by R. Legvold, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
See: A. Bohr, "Regionalism in Central Asia: New Geopolitics, Old Regional Order," *International Affairs*, No. 80 (3), 2004, pp. 485-502; N. MacFarlane, "The United States and Regionalism in Central Asia," *International Affairs*, No. 80 (3), 2004, pp. 447-461; D. Smith, *Central Asia: A New Great Game? Research Monograph from Strategic Studies Institute*, 1996, p. 20 (see also: T.C. Shaffer, V. Hate, *India’s “Look West” Policy: Why Central Asia Matters*, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington D.C., September 2007; N. Joshi, *Reconnecting India and Central Asia: Emerging Security and Economic Dimensions*, Central Asia Caucasus Institute Silk Road Studies Program, Washington D.C., 2010; Ch. Len, "Japan’s Central Asian Diplomacy: Motivations, Implications and Prospects for the Region," *The China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly*, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2005, pp. 127-149).
For an analysis of Blair’s new doctrine, see: J. Ralph "Tony Blair’s ‘New Doctrine of International Community’ and the UK Decision to Invade Iraq," University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies, Working Paper, No. 20, August 2005. Ralph adds: “To the historically minded, the New Doctrine bears an uncanny resemblance to the Old Doctrine of ethical imperialism, in whose name ‘civilized’ countries imposed their ‘values’ on barbarous ones.”
See: J. Nichol, *Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests*, CRS Report for Congress, 14 December, 2007.
See the full text at [http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/docs/2008/07/204750.shtml].
See: D. Trofimov, "Russian Foreign-Policy Objectives in Central Asia," *Russian Regional Perspectives Journal*, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 2006.
V. Surkov, "Natsionalizatsiia budushchego," *Expert Magazine*, No. 43 (537), 20 November, 2006, available at [http://expert.ru/expert/2006/43/nacionalizaciya_buduschego/]. For an excellent analysis of the term, see: A. Okara, "Sovereign Democracy: A New Russian Idea or a PR Project?", *Russia in Global Affairs*, No. 2, July-September 2007. Okara notes: “The phrase ‘sovereign democracy’ came into use long before Surkov. During the Cold War, it meant a democratic state independent of the Soviet Union and the Communist camp and having an appropriate political regime. In today’s world, it is broadly used in Taiwan where it provides an explanation for the island’s independence from China and juxtaposes the democratic principles of the regime in Taipei to the regime in Beijing,” available at [http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/_9123] (see also: I. Krastev, "Russia vs. Europe: The Sovereignty Wars," *Open Democracy*, 7 September, 2007).
A. Monaghan, "‘An Enemy at the Gates’ or ‘From Victory to Victory’? Russian Foreign Policy," *International Affairs*, Vol. 84, No. 4, July 2008, pp. 717-733.
Quoted from: D. Averre, "‘Sovereign Democracy’ and Russia’s Relations with the European Union," *Demokratizatsiya*, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2007, pp. 173-190.
See: A. Okara, op. cit.
See: N. Mehdiyeva, "New Man in the Kremlin: What Future for Russian Foreign Policy," *International Spectator*, No. 43 (2), June 2008, pp. 21-34.
For analysis of the U.N. resolution on the Sudan, see: R. Cohen "Will Security Council Resolution 1769 Make a Difference in Darfur?, Brookings Institution, 9 August, 2007, available at [http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2007/809humanrights_cohen.aspx].
See: E. Medeiros, T. Fravel, "China’s New Diplomacy," *Foreign Affairs*, No. 82 (6), 2003, pp. 23-35.
See: S. Xu Hui Shen, "Qualitative Energy Diplomacy in Central Asia": A Comparative Analysis of the Policies of the United States, Russia and China, The Brookings Institution, Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, April 2011, p. 16, available at [http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2011/04_us_russia_china_shen/4_us_russia_china_shen.pdf].
Ibidem (for full speech, see [http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/wenvisituscaeth/t55971.htm]).
J. Qingguo, "Learning to Live with the Hegemon: Evolution of China’s Policy toward the U.S. since the End of the Cold War," *Journal of Contemporary China*, Vol. 14, No. 44, August 2005 (quoted from: S. Xu Hui Shen, op. cit., p. 16).
See: International Crisis Group, "The Andijan Uprising", *Asia Briefing*, No. 38, 25 May, 2005; M. Walker, "Analysis: Uzbek Leader Escapes Isolation," *United Press International*, 7 May, 2005.
See: J. Corwin, "Is Russia Helping Tashkent Clean-up After Andijan?", *Eurasianet*, 14 July, 2005, available at [http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/civilsociety/articles/pp071505.shtml].
Note that the U.S. base in Uzbekistan closed after the Andijan uprising in November 200
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
