IRAN, TURKEY, AND RUSSIA: SEMI-PERIPHERAL STRATEGIES IN CENTRAL ASIA AND THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS

Authors

  • Ashot EGIAZARIAN Ph.D. (Econ.), Assistant Professor, rmenian State University of Economics (Erevan, Armenia) Author

Abstract

The author discusses the semi-peripheral strategies of Iran, Turkey, and Russia in Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus, as well as their trade expansion. He establishes that the semi-periphery countries, Russia and China in particular, dominate the region’s imports. He looks at all sides of Iran’s “struggle against exploitation” strategy, analyzes its impact on individual economies, and reveals the semi-peripheral function of neo-Ottomanism from the world-systems perspective. The author’s analysis of Russia’s strategy allows him to conclude that after switching from mercantilism to integration with the leaders of the capitalist world-system, Russia can increase its semi-peripheral role and strengthen its position in the region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. Wallerstein, “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 16, Issue 4, September 1974, p. 403.

See: I. Wallerstein, op. cit.

See: M.A. Molchanov, “Natsionalnye interesy v epokhu ‘globalnykh respublik’,” available at [http://www.polisportal.u/index.php?page_id=79].

See: V. Khoros, “Poluperiferia v kontekste globalizatsii,” Nezavisimy Almanakh “Lebed,” No. 329, 22 June, 2003, available at [http://www.lebed.com/2003/329.htm].

See: G. Arrighi, “The Developmentalist Illusion: A Reconceptualization of the Semiperiphery,” in: Semiperipheral States in the World-Economy, American Sociological Association, Greenwood Press, New York, 1990, pp. 11-44.

See: A. Kniazev, “Regionalnaia strategia Irana v Tsentralnoy Azii: evolutsia i prioritety,” available at [http://www.nyazev.org/stories/html/chang_200508.shtml].

For more details, see: A. Zulkharneev, “Energiticheskie interesy Irana v Kaspiyskom regione,” Tsentr politicheskikh issledovaniy Rossii, available at [http://www.pircenter.org/index.php?id=1248&news=5829].

See: “Iran. Energy Overview. Iran Energy Data,” IEA, available at [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Iran/background.html].

Every year Kazakhstan exports 4 million tons of oil across Iran under the swap scheme; Kazakhstan’s share is not large, about 7%. Turkmenistan uses the swap system to move nearly 90% of its annual oil export (about 3.2 million tons), or 43% of the total volume of swap operations (see: “Oil Flows and Export Capacity in the Caspian Sea and Black Sea Regions,” Kazakhstan. Energy Information Administration, p. 12, available at [http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/Kazakhstan/Oil.html]).

The combined designed annual capacity of two gas pipelines, Korpeje-Kurdkuy and Dovletabat-Serakhs-Khangeran, is 12.5 billion cu m.

The Iranian presence in the gas market of the Southern Caucasus is fairly limited. Azerbaijan sells gas to the northwestern provinces of Iran and receives Iranian gas for Nakhchivan. Iran supplies Armenia with 400 million cu m of natural gas in exchange for electric power in a ratio of 1:3.

See: Kazakhstan v 2010 godu. Statisticheskiy ezhegodnik.

See: UzDaily.uz, 9 February, 2011, available at [http://www.uzdaily.uz/articles-id-5622.htm].

For more details, see: S. Taşhan, “Turkey’s International Relations after Iraq War,” Foreign Policy, Issue 12, 2003, available at [www.foreignpolicy.org.tr/documents/periodicals/vol30.pdf].

See: “Social and Economic Situation of the Republic of Armenia in 2010; External Sector,” The National Statistical Service of Armenia, available at in Russian [http://www.armstat.am/file/article/sv_12_10r_411.pdf].

See: “Turtsia namerena snizit zavisimost ot rossiiskogo gaza,” Armenia Today, 16 December, 2011, available at [http://www.armtoday.info/default.asp?Lang=_Ru&NewsID=57254&SectionID=0&RegionID=0&Date=12/16/2011&PagePosition=1].

For more details, see: A. Egiazarian, Turtsia i Rossia vo vneshneekonomicheskikh otnosheniiakh Azerbaidzhana (1995-2006), Kavkaz Analytical Center, Regnum, Erevan-Moscow, 2007, 66 pp.

See: S. Laçiner, “Turkey’s Pipeline Politics,” Review of International Law and Politics (Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika), Issue 19, 2009.

For more details, see: N. Ulchenko, “Geostrategic Aspects of Gas Export from Russia and Turkmenistan to Turkey,” Foreign Policy (Dış Politika), Issue 34, 2002.

See: Segodnya, 2 September, 1997.

See: Vestnik Kavkaza, 12 November, 2011, available at [http://www.vestikavkaza.ru/news/ekonomika/gaz/46205.html].

[http://news.mail.ru/inworld/kazakhstan/politics/7593642/].

See: I. Svistunova: “Turtsia-Turkmenistan. ‘Dva gosudarstva—odin narod’,” 8 June, 2011, available at [http://www.centrasia.ru/newsA.php?st=1307512620].

For more details, see: A. Egiazarian, Gruzia: Strukturnye problemy ekonomiki i turetskaia ekonomicheskaia ekspansiia (1994-2007), Kavkaz Analytical Center, Regnum, Erevan-Moscow, 2007, 85 pp.

See: Ibidem.

For more details, see: A. Egiazarian, Turtsia i Rossia vo vneshneekonomicheskikh otnosheniiakh Azerbaidzhana (1995-2006).

See: “Turtsia stanovitsia globalnoy siloy v stroitelstve,” available at [http://antalyatoday.ru/articlerd/antalya-46.html].

See: I. Wallerstein, “Rossia i kapitalisticheskaia mir-ekonomika,” Svobodnaia mysl, No. 5, 1996, pp. 37-38.

Ibid., p. 41.

See: Ibid., pp. 38-39.

V. Khoros, op. cit.

See: “An External Policy to Serve Europe’s Energy Interests. European Commission and EU Secretary-General/High Representative,” June 2006, available at [http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/EN/reports/0082.pdf].

For more details, see: Z. Baran, “EU Energy Security: Time to End Russian Leverage,” Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2007.

Iran and especially China are prepared to pay even more for Central Asian gas, which explains the higher prices.

See: V. Paramonov, A. Strokov, “Russian Oil and Gas Projects and Investments in Central Asia,” Central Asia Series, Defense Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, 2008.

See: V. Paramonov, A. Strokov, Rossiiskie neftegazovye proekty i investitsii v Tsentralnoy Azii, Advanced Research and Assessment Group, Central Asian Series, Great Britain, 2008. 19 pp.

See: M. Dmitriev, “Long-Term Economic Consequences of the Aging Population in Russia,” Information Supplement to the Report on Social Development for 2009, Center for Strategic Research.

See: S. Ryazantsev, L. Rybakovsky, “International Migration in the Russian Federation,” The document was presented at a meeting of U.N. experts in international migration and development, available at [http://www.un.org/esa/population/eetings/ittmigdev2005/P11_Rybakovsky&Ryazantsev.pdf].

See: M. Laruelle, S. Peyrouse, China as a Neighbor: Central Asian Perspectives and Strategies. Silk Road Monograph, Central Asia and Caucasus Institute, Washington, D.C., April 2009.

See: Itogovy doklad o rezultatakh ekspertnoy raboty po aktualnym problemam sotsialno-ekonomicheskoy strategii Rossii na period do 2020 goda, pp. 806-807, available at [http://www.youngscience.ru/files/news-150312-strateg2020.pdf].

Downloads

Published

2013-02-28

Issue

Section

GEOPOLITICS AND SECURITY

How to Cite

EGIAZARIAN, A. (2013). IRAN, TURKEY, AND RUSSIA: SEMI-PERIPHERAL STRATEGIES IN CENTRAL ASIA AND THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 14(1), 57-71. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1555

Plaudit