THE BUREAUCRATIC-PATRIMONIAL STATE IN GEORGIA: HAS THE “ROSES REVOLUTION” GIVEN IT A NEW LEASE OF LIFE?

Authors

  • David APRASIDZE Ph.D. (Political Science), Hamburg University;lecturer at the Department of International Law and International Relations,Tbilisi State University (Tbilisi, Georgia) Author

Abstract

The post-socialist transformation phase that began late in the 1980s was a very special period in the context of the third wave of democratization that started in the 1970s. This was when the eastern military-political bloc headed by the Soviet Union fell apart.1 The post-socialist and especially the post-Soviet phases were marked by systemic transformations when the political system was undergoing the transition from authoritarianism to democracy and when the economic system was experiencing radical changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Many authors prefer to regard the post-socialist phase as a separate fourth wave. See: M. McFaul, “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship,” World Politics, Vol. 54, Jan- uary 2002, pp. 212-244. About the third wave see: Samuel P.

See: C. Offe, Der Tunell am Ende des Lichts. Erkundi- gungen der politischen Transformation im Neuen Osten, Frank- furt a. M., New York, 1994.

See: U. Menzel, Globalisierung versus Fragmen-tierung, Frankfurt a. M., 1998.

M. Zürn, Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates, Frank-furt a. M., 1998.

See: A. Grzymala-Busse, P.J. Loung, The Ignored Transition. Post-Communist State Development, Harvard Uni-versity, March 2002, pp. 1-3.

K. Schlichte, B. Wilke, “Der Staat und eigene seiner Zeitgenossen,” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 7. Jg,2/2000, pp. 359-384.

See: K. Schubert, Das Politiklexikon, Bonn, 1997, p. 274.

M. Zürn, op. cit.

See: N. Elias, Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band:

andlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation, Frankfurt a. M., 1997; The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. by Ch. Tilly, Princeton, 1975.

See: J.S. Migdal, Strong Societies and Weak States. State-society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World,Princeton, 1988, pp. 207-226.

See C.H. Landé, “Introduction: The Dyadic Basis of Clientelism,” Friends, Followers, and Factions. A Reader in Polit-ical Clientelism, ed. by S.W. Schmidt et. al., pp. XIII-XXXIX.

See: K. Schlichte, B. Wilke, op. cit.; G. Erdmann, “Neopatrimonialer Herrschaft—oder, Warum es in Afrika so viele Hybridregime gibt,” Demokratie und Staatlichkeit. Petra Bendel u. a. (Hrsg/). Opladen, 2003, pp. 323-342.

See: W. Merkel, A. Croissant, “Formale und Informale Institutionen in defekten Demokratien,” Politische Vierteljahress-chrift, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2000, pp. 3-31.

I have to thank Stephan Hensell from the Hamburg Institution of Peace and Security for this term.

See: G. Erdmann, op. cit., pp. 329-334.

K. Schlichte, Krieg und Vergesellschaftung in Afrika. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des Krieges, Münster, 1996; K. Schlichte,B. Wilke, op. cit.; G. Erdmann, op. cit.

See: Ch.H. Fairbanks Jr., “Clientelism and the Roots of Post-Soviet Disorder,” Transcaucasia, Nationalism, and Social Change, ed. by R.G. Suny, Michigan, 1983, pp. 341-374.

Sakartvelos Respublika, 21 December, 1990, p. 1.

For more detail, see: D. Darchiashvili, Politikosebi, djarikatsebi, mokalakeni, Tbilisi, 2000 (in Georgian).

See: S.F. Jones, “Adventures or Commanders: Civil-Military Relations in Georgia,” Civil-Military Relations in the Soviet and Yugoslav Successor States, ed. by C. Danapoulos, D. Ziker, Westview Press, 1996, pp. 35-42.

Interview with Tenghiz Kitovani, Droni, 14 June, 1990, p. 5.

D. Darchiashvili, op. cit., p. 227.

Ibidem.

See: G. Tevzadze, Sakartvelo: dzalauplebis simulatsia, Tbilisi, 1999; Sakartvelo: dzalauplebis dabruneba, Tbilisi, 2003;

Gotsiridze, O. Kandelaki, Gavleniani djgupebi da koruptsia sakartveloshi, Tbilisi, 2001 (all in Georgian).

S.F. Jones, op. cit., p. 46.

D. Darchiashvili, op. cit., p. 326.

See: J.S. Migdal, op. cit., pp. 214-236.

See: G. Erdmann, op. cit., pp. 334-337.

Rustavi-2 TV channel, 26 November, 2003.

In Albania the socialists who came to power in 1997 changed the entire staff of the security service and nearly three-

quarters of the police (see: S. Hensell, “Aspekte der staatlichen Gewaltordnung in Albanien,” DVPW ad hoc-Gruppe “Ordnung der Gewalt,” 25 September, 2003).

Rustavi-2 TV channel, 27 November, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2004-02-29

Issue

Section

NATION - BUILDING

How to Cite

APRASIDZE, D. (2004). THE BUREAUCRATIC-PATRIMONIAL STATE IN GEORGIA: HAS THE “ROSES REVOLUTION” GIVEN IT A NEW LEASE OF LIFE?. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 5(1), 42-48. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/317

Plaudit