COOPERATION BETWEEN JAPAN AND AMERICA IN CENTRAL ASIA: EW OUTLINES OF GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP
Abstract
In the 21st century the geopolitical configuration of forces in Central Asia acquired new outlines: the United States, the only world’s leader able to extend its influence worldwide, created a network of military bases in Central Asia and built-up strategic alliances there. American presence is a fact and a political reality caused by the Soviet Union’s disintegration and the weakening of Russia’s foothold in the region.
Washington’s consistent policies designed to involve the local countries in its sphere of influence have produced tangible results and demonstrated that America wants to and can dominate the world. A more or less in-depth investigation of the causes and specific features of U.S. policies in Central Asia, as well as of Russia’s efforts to stem America’s influence in a region that is still a sphere of its traditional interests is beyond the scope of the present article. The role of Japan, the oldest and the most loyal Amer-ican ally, in the Central Asian context is especially interesting. The country helped the United States to penetrate Central Asia and establish control over the strategically key areas.
Even though Japan is pursuing numerous goals in the region, its Central Asian policy can be divid-ed into periods within the world and regional contexts—an effort which reveals that Tokyo’s foreign policy initiatives are connected with the crucial political events in Central Asia.
Until 1996 neither Japanese nor American policies betrayed any serious strategic interconnections, since the Western countries were unanimous in their “desire” to help the post-Soviet independent states.
even though financial support on a bilateral basis and within international structures (the IMF, WB, IBRD,etc.), as well as the efforts to establish military, political, and economic contacts to obtain guarantees of nuclear security and nuclear non-proliferation were collective efforts, they cannot be described as pooling efforts for the sake of any strategic goal. And not because there was no such goal, rather there was no clear idea of the desired results.
Downloads
References
See: A.A. Kniazev, Istoria Afghanskoy voyny 1990-kh gg. i prevrashchenie Afghanistana v istochnik ugroz dlia Tsentral’noy Azii, Bishkek, 2001, p. 56.
See: S. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, New York, 1996.
See: N.P. Dmitrievskaia, “Iapono-amerikanskiy dogovor bezopasnosti: novye tendentsii i politicheskoe vzaimodeyst-vie,” in: Iaponia i problemy bezopasnosti v ATR, Moscow, 1996, p. 129.
See: M.I. Krupianko, Iaponia posle “kholodnoy voyny.” Politika obespechenia natsional’noy bezopasnosti, Moscow,2001, p. 113.
See: G.D. Hook, J. Gilson, C.W. Hughes, H. Dobson, Japan’s International Relations. Politics, Economics and Security,London, New York, 2000, p. 141.
M.I. Krupianko, op. cit., p. 113.
See: D. Trofimov, “Shanghai Process: From the ‘Five’ to the Cooperation Organization. Summing Up the 1990s and Looking Ahead,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 2 (14), 2002, p. 86.
Z. Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard. American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives, Basic Books, New York,1997, p. 148.
Vremia MN, No. 980, 31 July, 2002.
Ibidem.
Asahi shinbun, 29 October, 2001.
See: F. Tolipov, “Are the Heartland and Rimland Changing in the Wake of the Operation in Afghanistan?” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 5 (23), 2003, p. 101.
See: Obshchestvenniy reyting, 19 January, 2004.
See: Vecherniy Bishkek, 12 October, 2003.
See: D. Trofimov, op. cit., p. 88.
See: F. Tolipov, op. cit., p. 102.
See: S.G. Luzianin, “Kitay, Rossia i Tsentral’naia Azia,” Kitay v mirovoy politike, Moscow, 2001, p. 331.
V.O. Kistanov, “Vneshniaia politika Iaponii na rubezhe vekov,” in: Iaponia: konets XX veka. Poslednie tendentsii trans-formatsii, Moscow, 1996, p. 131.
See: Ibidem.
See: M. Nosov, “Iaponia i mirotvorcheskaia deiatel’nost OON,” in: Iaponia i global’nye problemy chelovechestva,Moscow, 1999, p. 267.
See: Ibid., p. 276.
See: O.A. Dobrinskaia, “O podkhode Iaponii k bor’be s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom,” in: Iaponia 2002-2003, A Yearbook, Moscow, 2003, p. 91.
Ibidem.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
