LINKING THEORY AND PRACTICES OF SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE: A LITERATURE REVIEW
Keywords:
Literature Review, Sustainability, Sustainable Enterprise, Sustainable Enterprise IndicatorsAbstract
Becoming a company categorized as an excellent sustainable enterprise is the goal of many companies in this era of sustainability demands. Many companies are trying to achieve this, but few have lost their way because there is a scarcity of clear and comprehensive indicators. This paper examines redefining sustainable enterprises and compiling a list of enterprise sustainability indicators based on a literature review. This study's integrative literature study method consists of a systematic literature review and a complimentary article. To the best of our knowledge, this literature review is the first to be conducted in the context of sustainable enterprise in Indonesia regarding various aspects of sustainability. In order to support a contemporary definition of sustainable enterprise, a comprehensive set of indicators should be developed. This paper presents a redefinition of sustainable enterprise and a list of sustainable enterprise insulators. At the end of this paper, several managerial implications and future agendas are also discussed.
Downloads
References
Shrivastava, P. and S. Berger, Sustainability principles: A review and directions. Organization Management Journal, 2010. 7(4): p. 246-261.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2010.35.
Zollo, M., C. Cennamo, and K. Neumann, Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment, 2013. 26(3): p. 241-259.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613496433.
Anbarasan, P., Stakeholder engagement in sustainable enterprise: Evolving a conceptual framework, and a case study of ITC. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018. 27(3): p. 282-299.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1999.
Shrivastava, P. and S. Ivanaj, Transdisciplinary art, technology, and management for sustainable enterprise. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 2011. 2.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22545/2011/00012.
Shrivastava, P., S. Ivanaj, and S. Persson, Transdisciplinary study of sustainable enterprise. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013. 22(4): p. 230-244.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1773.
Tumitit, A.A., Volunteer Probation Assistants' Awareness of Functions and Problems encountered alongside Probation and Parole Officers. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2020. 15(1): p. 142-156.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-008-9043-0.
Wirtenberg, J., et al., HR's role in building a sustainable enterprise: Insights from some of the world's best companies. People and Strategy, 2007. 30(1): p. 10.
Ketprapakorn, N. and S. Kantabutra, Sustainable social enterprise model: Relationships and consequences. Sustainability, 2019. 11(14): p. 3772.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143772.
Ren, S. and S.E. Jackson, HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 2020. 30(3): p. 100691.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691.
Jiatong, W., et al., Impact of Social Entrepreneurial Factors on Sustainable Enterprise Development: Mediating Role of Social Network and Moderating Effect of Government Regulations. SAGE Open, 2021. 11(3): p. 21582440211030636.DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211030636.
Liczmańska-Kopcewicz, K., K. Mizera, and P. Pypłacz, Corporate social responsibility and sustainable development for creating value for FMCG sector enterprises. Sustainability, 2019. 11(20): p. 5808.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205808.
Tan, K.S., M.D. Ahmed, and D. Sundaram, Sustainable enterprise modelling and simulation in a warehousing context. Business Process Management Journal, 2010.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011076511.
Aspers, P. and U. Corte, What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative sociology, 2019.42(2): p. 139-160.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7.
Edgeman, R., Sustainable enterprise excellence: towards a framework for holistic data-analytics.Corporate Governance, 2013.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0073.
Wheeler, D., A. Zohar, and S. Hart, Educating senior executives in a novel strategic paradigm: early experiences of the Sustainable Enterprise Academy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2005. 14(3): p. 172-185.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.448.
Cho, H., P. Lee, and C.H. Shin, Becoming a sustainable organization: focusing on process, administrative innovation and human resource practices. Sustainability, 2019. 11(13): p. 3554.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133554.
Włodarczyk-Madejska, J. and P. Ostaszewski, Determinants of the Judicial Response to Juvenile Delinquency. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 2021. 16(1): p. 201-216.
Sweet, S., N. Roome, and P. Sweet, Corporate environmental management and sustainable enterprise: the influence of information processing and decision styles. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2003. 12(4): p. 265-277.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.365.
Kantabutra, S., Achieving corporate sustainability: Toward a practical theory. Sustainability, 2019. 11(15): p. 4155.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154155.
Kennelly, J.J. and F. Bradley, Ireland in the new century: an opportunity to foster an ethic of sustainable enterprise. Sustainable Development, 2005. 13(2): p. 91-101.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.249.
Schaltegger, S. and R. Burritt, Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018. 147(2): p. 241-259.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2938-0.
Sekerka, L.E. and D. Stimel, How durable is sustainable enterprise? Ecological sustainability meets the reality of tough economic times. Business Horizons, 2011. 54(2): p. 115-124.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.006.
Mohapatra, S. and P. Verma, Tata as a sustainable enterprise: The causal role of spirituality. Journal of Human Values, 2018. 24(3): p. 153-165.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685818774116.
Keijzers, G., The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of cleaner production, 2002.10(4): p. 349-359.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00051-8.
Davis, J., et al., Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 2014. 3(1): p. 1-9.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511.
Bansal, S., I. Garg, and G.D. Sharma, Social entrepreneurship as a path for social change and driver of sustainable development: A systematic review and research agenda. Sustainability, 2019. 11(4): p. 1091.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041091.
Macke, J. and D. Genari, Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management. Journal of cleaner production, 2019. 208: p. 806-815.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.091.
Snyder, H., Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 2019. 104: p. 333-339.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Torraco, R.J., Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, 2005. 4(3): p. 356-367.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283.
Wong, G., et al., RAMESES publication standards: Meta‐narrative reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2013. 69(5): p. 987-1004.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12095
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12092.
Yen, T.T.H., T.T.T. Thuy, and S. Tereshchenko. MODERN APPROACHES TO THE DEFFINITION OF SUSTAINABLE ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT.
Elkington, J. and I.H. Rowlands, Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Choice Rev. Online, 1999. 36: p. 36-3997.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.36- 3997.
Rahdari, A., S. Sepasi, and M. Moradi, Achieving sustainability through Schumpeterian social entrepreneurship: The role of social enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016. 137: p. 347-360.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.159.
Danubianu, M. and C. Teodorescu, Impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable enterprise development. Present Environment and Sustainable Development, 2017(1): p. 129-139.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pesd-2017-0012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.