PARADOXES OF DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIZATION TRENDS IN CENTRAL ASIA AND THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS

Authors

  • Arthur ATANESIAN Ph.D. (Political Science), Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Sociology, Erevan State University (Erevan, Armenia) Author

Keywords:

Transitology, political

Abstract

The world’s latest history has unequivocally demonstrated that most states have opted for democracy, at least for the foreseeable future. Indeed, democracy proved to be the most tempting, and the most successful of all the utopias offered to mankind throughout its history. It seems that unlike many other political systems, democracy which relies on the support of the majority will survive. After all, most states across the world have already accepted the idea: the democratic conception, in fact, stems from democratic choice.

Much has been already written about democracy: classical philosophers and thinkers of later ages were attracted to it; political scientists, politicians, journalists, and sociologists of our time display an inordinate interest in democracy and democratization. It is lauded from all sides; political theories, such as transitology, based on the study of the waves and processes of democratization, have added fire to the heated discussions about democracy. In fact, democratization is moving ahead much slower than the discussions about it. This is one of the many paradoxes of democracy 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2005-12-31

Issue

Section

DEMOCRACY AND TRANSITION PERIOD

How to Cite

ATANESIAN, A. (2005). PARADOXES OF DEMOCRACY AND DEMOCRATIZATION TRENDS IN CENTRAL ASIA AND THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 6(6), 13-21. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/784

Plaudit

Similar Articles

71-80 of 351

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.