ENERGY SECURITY IN THE INTERRELATIONS AMONG THE EU, RF, UKRAINE, AND CENTRAL ASIA

Authors

  • Sergey TOLSTOV Senior Fellow at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kiev, Ukraine) Author

Abstract

In the last few years, energy transit and long-term energy supply issues have come to the fore on the international scene. The reasons are obvious: Europe and North America are consuming increasingly larger amounts of energy, while the prospect of oil, natural gas and, in the more distant future, coal (non-renewable energy sources) shortages loom all the more ominously.
 Everything related to international security (military security in particular) is highly structuralized within the system of international relations. However, Europe’s energy security, which is currently being discussed, has demonstrated a classic example of the inability of the state and corporate egotism to come to terms with each other in order to balance their highly varied interests.
 Seen as a possibility, disrupted energy supply and the resultant energy deficit as a whole have already created different behavior patterns in the energy suppliers and consumers. In the European context, successful agreements in this sphere are limited to bilateral contracts among the EU structure's, European energy distributors, and the energy supplier-companies, of which Russia’s Gazprom is the largest.
 More often than not the very complicated and fairly contradictory positions of the sides in-volved in the multisided process obscure the real content of the European energy security issue and delay long-term and mutually acceptable decisions. The newly formulated norms of obligatory and strict abidance by the rules of diversification and “free market” in the oil and gas trade have added to the political tension. Given the worst scenario, energy supply might develop into a sphere of bitter rivalry over short-term economic or political advantages. Political interests do not necessarily bring huge profits.
 In the European context, the compatibility of the EU’s and Russia’s long-term energy strategies remains the key issue of the related discussions. The Central Asian countries and Ukraine have an important, but relatively autonomous, role to play in the European energy balance. At the same time, the very fact that the energy security issue belongs to the power and influence context of international relations means that other inter-national political and economic actors intend to increase their presence in European oil and gas trade. The United States has its sights set on be-coming involved as one of the sides in oil and gas trade and transit contracts and agreements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: EIA Releases Annual Energy Outlook 2006, Full Report, available at [http://www.eia.doe.gov/neic/press/

ress267.html], 9 October, 2006.

See: EIA Annual Energy Review 2004, available at [http://www.eia.doe.gov/aer/], 9 October, 2006.

A Secure Europe in a Better World—European Security Strategy, Approved by the European Council held in Brussels on 12 December, 2003 and drafted under the responsibilities of the EU High Representative Javier Solana.

russels, 2003.

See: Basis of an Energy Strategy for Europe, Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly. Committee on Science and Technology, Doc. 8653, 21 February, 2000, pp 1-2.

Ibid., pp. 2-3.

See: A. Starostin, “Ukhod ot ‘neftianoy finliandizatsii’,” Natsional’nyi interes, No. 1, 2005, pp. 33-35; L. Gusak,

Gazovyi balans Ukrainy-2006—prognoz,” Natsional’nyi interes, No. 4, 2005, pp. 35-40; A. Starostin, “Iuri Boiko: voz-vrat epokhi gazovoy poliarizatsii,” Natsional’nyi interes, No. 4, 2005, pp. 46-49.

See: “Geoekonomicheskie itogi ‘bol’shoy gazovoy voyny’,” Memorandum Instituta natsional’noy strategii, 21 Feb-ruary, 2006, available at [http://www.lenta.ru/articles/2006/02/20/memorandum/].

“Ukraina neozhidanno soglasilas’ s poetapnym povysheniem tsen na rossiyskiy gaz,” 23 August, 2005, available at [http://www.korrespondent.net/main/128909].

See: Iu. Mostovaia, A. Eremenko, “Sovershite vy massu otkrytiy (inogda ne zhelaia togo),” Zerkalo nedeli, No. 4 (583),4-10 February, 2006; “Naftogaz podpisal v Moskve sem’ soglasheniy s RosUkrEnergo i Gazpromom, a ne odno. Kak oka-zalos’,” Interfax-Ukraina, 6 February, 2006.

See: Kommersant, No. 94, 29 May, 2006.

See: “Ukraina khochet privlech’ SShA v partnery po gazu,” 2 August, 2006, available at [http://www.oilru.com/

ews/32766/].

See: “Novyi prem’er-ministr Ukrainy Viktor Ianukovich zaiavil, chto ne sobiraetsia peresmatrivat’ gazovye soglash-enia s Rossiey,” 11 August, 2006, available at [http://www.oilru.com/news/32915/].

See: A. Bekker, T. Ivzhenko, “RosUkrEnergo poterpit ubytki v politicheskikh tseliakh,” Vedomosti, 28 Septem-ber, 2006.

See: “Monopolia na eksport gaza: otkrytogo konflikta ne poluchilos’,” 5 July, 2006, available at [http://

ww.news.central.kz/archive/hind.chem.oilgas/200607/06023144.text].

See: “Matthew Bryza: Truboprovody BTC and SCP sozdaiut infrastrukturu novogo pokolenia dlia eksporta uglevo-dorodov iz Azerbaijana,” 5 July, 2006, available at [http://www.news.central.kz/archive/hind.chem.oilgas/200607/

text].

See: J. Bielecki, J. Przybylski, “Gazoci g z Azji za tarcz ?” Rzeczpospolita, 4 September, 2006.

See: “Ukraina, Gruzia i ES khotiat postroit’ gazoprovod za $2 milliarda,” 17 March, 2006, available at [http://

ww.korrespondent.net/main/148306].

See: “Ukraina otkazalas’ zakupat’ rossiyskiy gaz,” 6 October, 2006, available at [http://www.korrespondent.net/

ain/166433].

See: “‘Gazprom’ meniaet uslovia postavki gaza v strany SNG,” 22 September 2006, available at [http://www.ibk.ru/

ews/_gazprom_menyaet_usloviya_postavki_gaza_v_strani_sng-23386/].

See: Briefing ministra inostrannykh del Rossii Sergeia Lavrova, 3 October, 2006, available at [http://g8russia.ru/

ews/20061004/1264315.html].

Downloads

Published

2006-12-31

Issue

Section

ENERGY PROJECTS AND ENERGY POLICY

How to Cite

TOLSTOV, S. (2006). ENERGY SECURITY IN THE INTERRELATIONS AMONG THE EU, RF, UKRAINE, AND CENTRAL ASIA. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 7(6), 07-18. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1020

Plaudit