AZERBAIJAN: IRANIAN VECTOR OF RELIGIOUS REVIVAL
Abstract
Together with independence, the peoples of Azerbaijan acquired the freedom of worship envisaged in the republic’s constitution, which serves as the legal basis of religious resurrection in the country. The upsurge of religious feelings is partly explained by what a casual observer may take for a paradox. I have in mind the lack of spirituality caused, among other things, by the absence of religious continuity among the younger generation, which is willingly embracing Islam. Islamic religious and philosophical thought in Azerbaijan is struggling through an ideological fog to bring the nation back to its traditional moral and spiritual values. The traditional clergy and religious radicals exploiting the ideological vacuum left by socialism are little interested in the resurging interest in Islam and its potential contribution to the country’s rebirth.
In fact, the clergy, which betrayed its inability to meet the current challenges, has become a serious obstacle for those who wanted to reach religious perfection: many of them cannot accept the archaic and even anti-social tradition which imposes ideological limitations and bans free thinking. Those members of the clergy who have retained their former role as Islam’s social-historical sheath allegedly designed to shape the religion’s environment are rejected together with the fossilized traditions. We should admit, however, that it was thanks to the conservative-minded clergy that religious resurrection in Azerbaijan did not acquire political hues. However, this should not be taken to mean that the clergy is not responsible for the deep internal and external crisis of religion in Azerbaijan.
Today, the revivalist movement, which has already acquired a fairly wide scope, stands opposed to the traditional religious leaders. It has failed so far to grasp the meaning of the key tasks civil society should address on its road toward democracy. The revivalists passionately desire to cleanse religion of communist impurities; they cherish its spiritual harmony, while their approach to reforming Islamic rituals deserves attention. They have not accumulated enough internal resources so far to use religion to deal with the country’s major social problems.
Downloads
References
See: L.I. Medvedko, “Rossia, Zapad, Islam: ‘stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy’?” Miry v mirovykh i “drugikh” voynakh na razlome epokh, Kuchkovo pole Publishers, Moscow, 2003, pp. 418-419.
See: A. Malashenko, “Dva lika islamskogo radikalizma,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 15 April, 2003.
See: M.V. Riabov, “Vliianie sistemoobrazuiushchikh faktorov sotsiuma na religioznuiu situatsiiu v rayonakh tra-ditsionnogo rasprostranenia islama,” Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, No. 3, 1996, p. 125.
M.A. Faksh, The Future of Islam in the Middle East: Fundamentalism in Egypt, Algeria, and Saudi Arabia, Praeger Publishers, Westport, 1997, p. 114.
A.S. Moussalli, Moderate and Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: The Quest for Modernity, Legitimacy, and the Islamic State, University Press of Florida, 1999, p. 36.
See: T. Swietochowski, “Islam i natsional’noe samosoznanie na pogranichnykh territoriiakh: Azerbaijan,” in: Re-ligia i politika na Kavkaze. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, KISMI, Erevan, 2004, p. 29.
M. Mohaddessin, Islamic Fundamentalism: The New Global Threat, Seven Locks Press, Washington, 1993, p. 39.
See: M. Ganji, Defying the Iranian Revolution: From a Minister to the Shah to a Leader of Resistance, Praeger Publishers, Westport, 2002, p. 131.
See: M. Mohaddessin, op. cit., p. 48.
See: D.V. Suslov, “Iranskiy kliuch k mirovoi stabil’nosti,” Globalaffairs.ru, 16 February, 2005.
See, for example: 525-ci q zet, 5 August, 2003.
See: 525-ci q zet, 27 April, 2005.
See: M. Ganji, op. cit., p. 68.
See: M.I. Krutikhin, “Iranskie ocherki. Chast 8. ‘Odnostoronniy soiuz,’ ili kak partia ‘Tudeh’ uchastvovala v rev-olutsii,” RusEnergy.com, 8 December, 2001.
See: M. Ganji, op. cit., pp. 109-110.
See: A. Ehteshami, After Khomeini: The Iranian Second Republic, Routledge Publishers, London, 1995, p. 216.
Ibn Taymiyya, Minhajj as-Sunna-an-Nabaviyya, Vol. 1, Cairo, 1962, p. 371.
M. Mohaddessin, op. cit., p. 20.
See: Iranskaia revolutsia 1978-1979 gg. Prichiny i uroki, ed. by A.Z. Arabajan, Nauka Publishers, Main Depart-ment of Oriental Literature, Moscow, 1989, p. 96.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
