CENTRAL ASIA AND THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS: EOPOLITICAL VALUE FOR RUSSIA

Authors

  • Sergey LOUNEV D.Sc. (Hist.), chief research associate, Institute of World Economy and International Relations, RAS; professor, Moscow State Institute (University) of International Relations,Foreign Ministry of Russia (Moscow, Russia) Author

Abstract

The world has been moving toward the regionalization of international economic and political relations for some time now. This is manifested in two ways:
— In a shift toward a multipolar world, which seems quite probable and will most likely be realized through cooperation; this will divide the world into clearly discernable zones of influence of the world powers within which regional contacts will rapidly develop.
— In the emergence of “gray zones” for which the world centers will not take (or will be unable to take) responsibility.

Central Asia and the Southern Caucasus form one of such vast regions in the post-Soviet expanse. Their development trends are very similar, while the differences between them can be described as “general,” “particular,” and “singular.” Very soon these regions, or at least their larger part,1 will be regarded as sub-regions of the Greater Middle East.
The southern part of the Soviet Union developed into a geopolitical region in its own right when the socialist system of statehood (which kept together ethnic groups never on the best terms with each other for long periods) became a thing of the past. The Soviet Union’s disintegration brought the old contradictions among ethnic groups and the former Soviet republics or their sub-regions into the open.
Across the post-Soviet expanse, the Caucasus was a place with the greatest ethnic problems, which drove Russians away from many parts of the region, the Northern Caucasus included. Russians no longer live in many places, while elsewhere the remaining Russians are actively driven away. Today, there are less than 10,000 Russians living in Armenia, which means that sooner or later the Russian diaspora will disappear. A few Russians are still living in Georgia. Azerbaijan is the only republic that still preserves its Russian community of about 150,000, which is much fewer than before.
The ethnic boundaries in the Caucasus mostly coincide with religious borders. There is a great share of the secular population in Muslim areas. So far, the danger of Islamic fundamentalism taking the upper hand in Azerbaijan is still negligible. Today, Islam has greatly increased its influence in the Lezghian (neighboring on the Northern Caucasus) and Talysh (neighboring on Iran) districts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The work was done with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Studies (RFFS) as part of research project No. 05-06-80365a.

Soviet science placed Kazakhstan outside Central Asia.

See: Nezavisimaia gazeta, 21 April, 1998, p. 1.

See: A. Kurtov, “Potentsial’nyi garant stabil’nosti,” Sodruzhestvo NG, No. 2, 1999, p. 4.

See: Human Development Report 2005. International Cooperation at a Crossroads, UNDP, New York, 2005, p. 281.

See: A.V. Akimov, “Poisk mesta v mirovom khoziaystve,” Tsentral’naia Azia: puti integratsii v mirovoe soobsh-chestvo, Moscow, 1995, p. 91.

See: G. Starchenkov, “Blesk i nishcheta suverennogo Uzbekistana,” Azia i Afrika segodnia, No. 6, 1995, p. 10.

See: S. Zhukov, “Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan v sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh structurakh sovremennogo mira,” Mirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia, No. 36, 1997, pp. 47-48.

See: Rossia i Kazakhstan, Stenogramma nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, Rossiskiy tsentr strategicheskikh i mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy, Moscow, 1995, p. 58.

See: BIKI (Moscow), 5 January, 1999.

See: Human Development Report 2005…, pp. 267-268.

See: Doklad o razvitii cheloveka. 2004, UNDP, Ves’ Mir Publishers, Moscow, 2004, p. 211.

See: V. Panfilova, “Polozhit’ konets ‘zamorozhennoy’ diktature Niyazova,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 14 March,2005.

See: V. Panfilova, “Opasaias’ repressiy, mestnye revoliutsionery bol’she trekh ne sobiraiutsia,” Nezavisimaia gaze-ta, 22 April, 2005.

See: Doklad o razvitii cheloveka. 2004, p. 212.

Ibid., p. 184.

See: Human Development Report. Kazakhstan. 2004. Education for All: the Key Goal for a New Millennium,UNDP, New York, 2004, p. 103; Human Development Report 2005…, p. 220.

See: Human Development Report. Kazakhstan, 2004…, p. 108.

Ibid., p. 22.

See: Human Development Report 2005, p. 231.

Experts agree that the authorities overstate the number of refugees to increase international aid, yet the real figures are not small either.

The CIA site [http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/kz.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/

actbook/geos/tx.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/uz.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/

actbook/geos/kg.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ti.html].

The CIA site [http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/am.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/

actbook/geos/gg.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/aj.html].

For more detail, see: S. Lounev, G. Shirokov, “Central Asia as a New Region of World Politics,” in: Ñentral Asia.

onflict, Resolution, and Change, ed. by R.Z. Sagdeev and S. Eisenhower, CPSS Press, Washington, 1995, pp. 293- 310.

See: M. Nesterova, “Bol’shaia igra v neft’,” Sodruzhestvo NG, No. 7, 1998, p. 1.

See: E. Baykova, “Nazarbaev and Niyazov namereny konkurirovat’ s OPEK,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 28 March,2005.

See: S. Kamenev, “Iushchenko prishlos’ postupit’sia printsipami,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 28 March, 2005.

See: V. Mikhaylov, G. Smol’nikov, “Gazovye reki, neftianye berega,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 19 March, 1997,p. 3.

See: A. Vladimirov, “Stavka na inostrannykh investorov,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 17 February, 1999, p. 4.

See: A.A. Arbatov, I.Sh. Amirov, “Rossia v mirovoy sisteme neftegazoobespechenia,” Mineral’nye resursy Ros-sii. Ekonomika i upravlenie (Moscow), No. 2, 1993, p. 19.

See: A. Gromyko, “Novaia ‘velikaia igra’,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 20 August, 1998, p. 8.

See: Iu. Fedorov, Kaspiyskaia neft’ i mezhdunarodnaia bezopasnost’, Issue 1, Federatsia mira i soglasia, Moscow,1996, p. 17.

See: International Energy Outlook 2003, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2003.

See: M. Gafarly, “Neft’ Kaspiia—problema i politiki i ekonomiki,” Sodruzhestvo NG, No. 4, 1998, p. 1.

The CIA site [http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/kz.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/

actbook/geos/tx.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/uz.html; http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/

actbook/geos/aj.html].

[http://www.mineral.ru/Chapters/News/7387.html].

[http://www.my.perm.ru/news/view/?id=13562].

See: Ch.A. Kupchan, “Is Georgia Reverting to Tyranny? Wilted Rose,” The New Republic Online, 30 January, 2006 [http://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=20060206&s=kupchan020606].

Downloads

Published

2006-06-30

Issue

Section

WORLD AND REGIONAL CENTERS OF POWER AND THEIR IMPACT ON THE SITUATION IN CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS

How to Cite

LOUNEV, S. (2006). CENTRAL ASIA AND THE SOUTHERN CAUCASUS: EOPOLITICAL VALUE FOR RUSSIA. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 7(3), 14-25. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/896

Plaudit