Contractual Solidarity and Future Contractual Relations: A Comparative Legal Study
Keywords:
Contractual Solidarity, Contractual Relations, Civil lawAbstract
Contractual solidarity is a familiar title and traditionally seems to be a stable and stable system. Still, the meditator finds that it raises critical legal problems, whether it is the harmonization between it and the general rules of the contract or the obligation to cooperate information and security, as a point of balance between the conflicting interests of contractors. It leads to the emergence of personal rights that guarantee the legal protection of the contract, which allows the legislator and the judge to intervene to ensure the effectiveness of its judgments? How can each party to the contractual relationship satisfy the legitimate expectations of the other party without harming the other party? Which means that everyone owes the other and owes society under the idea of solidarity? The analytical study of this subject in this research is a serious attempt to answer these questions. The parties' selfish interests before the contract's conclusion cease and disappear upon the execution of the agreement, through the dependence of the parties on each other for their common interests, the so-called contractual solidarity. The idea of solidarity is not the result of the moment. Still, its emergence has extended to varying periods, and on this basis, this research will be divided into two topics that address the concept of contractual solidarity. In the second, we will explain how solidarity and contract are compatible.
Downloads
References
Ter Meulen, R., Solidarity, justice, and recognition of the other. Theoretical medicine and bioethics, 2016. 37(6): p. 517-529.
Anderson, E. and B. Weitz, The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. Journal of marketing research, 1992. 29(1): p. 18-34.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900103.
Raffles, H., " Local theory": Nature and the Making of an Amazonian Place. Cultural Anthropology, 1999. 14(3): p. 323-360.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1999.14.3.323.
Kuran, T., The economic ascent of the Middle East’s religious minorities: the role of Islamic legal pluralism. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2004. 33(2): p. 475-515.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/422707.
Pope, W. and B.D. Johnson, Inside organic solidarity. American Sociological Review, 1983: p. 681- 692.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094927.
Markovits, D., Arbitration's Arbitrage: Social Solidarity at the Nexus of Adjudication and Contract.DePaul L. Rev., 2009. 59: p. 431.
Metz, K.H., Solidarity and history. Institutions and social concepts of solidarity in 19th century western Europe, in Solidarity. 1999, Springer. p. 191-207.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015- 9245-1_10.
Newton, K., Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International political science review, 2001. 22(2): p. 201-214.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512101222004.
Stampp, K.M., The Concept of a Perpetual Union. The Journal of American History, 1978. 65(1): p. 5-33.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1888140.
Scorgie, K. and D. Sobsey, Transformational outcomes associated with parenting children who have disabilities. Mental retardation, 2000. 38(3): p. 195-206.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1352/0047- 6765(2000)038<0195:TOAWPC>2.0.CO;2.
Girgis, S., R.P. George, and R.T. Anderson, What is marriage. Harv. JL & Pub. Pol'y, 2011. 34: p. 245.
Collins, H., Good faith in European contract law. Oxford J. Legal Stud., 1994. 14: p. 229.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/14.2.229.
Maureira, N.U., Introduction du Concept Américain des Contrats Incomplets en Droit Civil Français. Global Jurist Topics, 2005. 4(3).DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1535-167X.1141.
Didier, P., Brèves notes sur le contrat-organisation. Mélanges Terré, 1999: p. 633-7.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/comm.087.0633.
Delforge, C., Le contrat à long terme entre firmes, un contrat relationnel exemplaire? Revue interdisciplinaire d'etudes juridiques, 2016. 76(1): p. 57-95.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/riej.076.0057.
Dana, J., R.A. Weber, and J.X. Kuang, Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 2007. 33(1): p. 67-80.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z.
Selinker, L., M. Todd-Trimble, and L. Trimble, Rhetorical function-shifts in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 1978: p. 311-320.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586057.
Watt, H.M., Private international law beyond the schism. Transnational legal theory, 2011. 2(3): p. 347-428.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/204140011800664120.
Di Palma, G., Legitimation from the top to civil society: Politico-cultural change in Eastern Europe.World politics, 1991. 44(1): p. 49-80.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010423.
Shehata, S. and J. Stacher, The Brotherhood goes to parliament. Middle East Report, 2006. 36(240): p. 32.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25164744.
Pereira, F.S., La protection des profissionnels contre les clauses abusives: Comparaison franco- brésilienne. 2017.
Shandi, Y.M., M. Amayreh, and O. Ismail, Depriving the Debtor's Essential Obligation of Its Substance and Its Remedies under the Provisions of Article 1170 of the French Civil Code. J. Pol. & L., 2020. 13: p. 129.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v13n2p129.
Habermas, J., Justice and solidarity: On the discussion concerning stage 6. The moral domain: Essays in the ongoing discussion between philosophy and the social sciences, 1990: p. 224-254.
Goujon-Bethan, T., L'expertise non judiciaire à l'aune des droits fondamentaux. L'expertise non judiciaire à l'aune des droits fondamentaux, 2014: p. 1-194.
Schwartz, R., Is solidarity legal? International Union Rights, 2009. 16(1): p. 20-21.
Buell, L., U.K. Heise, and K. Thornber, Literature and environment. Annual review of environment and resources, 2011. 36: p. 417-440.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855.
Bruner, J.S., Nature and uses of immaturity. American psychologist, 1972. 27(8): p. 687.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033144.
Fauvarque-Cosson, B. and A.-J. Kerhuel, Is law an economic contest? French reactions to the doing business World Bank reports and economic analysis of the law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2009. 57(4): p. 811-829.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0024.
Ackerman, B.A. and R.B. Stewart, Reforming environmental law: The democratic case for market incentives. Colum. j. Envtl. L., 1987. 13: p. 171.DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v272.2016.64295.
van der Vaart, L.C., The Contractualization of Human Rights-State-Investor Contracts in the Agri- Business Sector. 2017.
Krolik, C., M.-P. Blin-Franchomme, I. Desbarats, G. Jazottes, V. Vidalens, Entreprise et développement durable-Approche juridique pour l’acteur économique du XIXe siècle, 2011. Revue juridique de l'Environnement, 2012. 37(2): p. 403-404.
McCrudden, C. Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Wiley Online Library.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00099.x.
Melé, D., P. Debeljuh, and M.C. Arruda, Corporate ethical policies in large corporations in Argentina, Brazil and Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 2006. 63(1): p. 21-38.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7100-y.
Danilov, A. and D. Sliwka, Can contracts signal social norms? Experimental evidence. Management Science, 2017. 63(2): p. 459-476.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2336.
Benvenisti, E. and G.W. Downs, The empire's new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stan. L. Rev., 2007. 60: p. 595.
Finneron-Burns, E., Contractualism and the non-identity problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2016. 19(5): p. 1151-1163.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9723-8.
Saulquin, J.-Y. and G. Schier, Responsabilité sociale des entreprises et performance. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 2007(1): p. 57-65.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rsg.223.0057.
Lemley, M.A. and C. Shapiro, A simple approach to setting reasonable royalties for standard- essential patents. Berkeley Tech. LJ, 2013. 28: p. 1135.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2243026.
Traina, F., Medical malpractice: the experience in Italy. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2009. 467(2): p. 434-442.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0582-z.
McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel, Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 2001. 26(1): p. 117-127.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987.
Deckert, K. and M. Sweeney, Whistleblowing: National Report for France, in Whistleblowing-A Comparative Study. 2016, Springer. p. 125-154.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25577-4_6.
Cooper, C. and B.K. Sovacool, Miracle or mirage? The promise and peril of desert energy part 2.Renewable energy, 2013. 50: p. 820-825.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.039.
Korobkin, R., Empirical scholarship in contract law: Possibilities and pitfalls. U. Ill. L. Rev., 2002: p. 1033.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.292100.
Fafchamps, M., Solidarity networks in preindustrial societies: Rational peasants with a moral economy. Economic development and cultural change, 1992. 41(1): p. 147-174.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/452001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
