AFGHANISTAN: ITS ROLE AND PLACE IN THE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM

Authors

  • Shaislam AKMALOV Ph.D. (Political Science), deputy rector at Tashkent Islamic University (Tashkent, Uzbekistan) Author

Abstract

For three decades now the country has been struggling for survival amid a never-ending armed conflict that makes a concerted foreign policy course impossible. This is fraught with a loss of statehood and is responsible for Afghanistan’s role and place in the international relations system. 

 The military-political crisis in Afghanistan is echoing across Central and Southern Asia and is spreading its negative impact even further across the world.
 Farkhad Tolipov, a political analyst from Uzbekistan, has rightly noted that strategic “friction”in Afghanistan is closely connected with the geopolitical reversal occurring in the Central Asian states.
e has written that “friction” makes it much harder to pursue strategic and tactical aims and that, if they are achieved at all, the cost will be enormous. The Afghan crisis is largely responsible for the geopolitical instability in Central Asia, which affects its security.1
 The foreign policy activities of the Central Asian states and the world community as a whole have to take the Afghan factor into account. President of Uzbekistan Islam Karimov has written:
The deepness and acuteness of the Afghan crisis and its obvious impact on the geopolitical proc-esses at the regional and global levels allow us to describe this tragedy as the largest and the most dangerous regional conflict of our time. The military-political crisis in Afghanistan is inevitably affecting regional stability in Central Asia and Uzbekistan’s national security, in particular, in the most negative way.”2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: F. Tolipov, “Strategic Friction in Afghanistan and Geopolitical Reversal in Central Asia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 2 (56), 2009, p. 44.

I. Karimov, Uzbekistan na poroge XXI veka: ugrozy bezopasnosti, usloviia i garantii progressa, Izdatelskiy dom “Drofa,” Moscow, 1997, pp. 20, 25.

In the past Afghanistan was seen as a “geopolitical chessboard” of sorts with Russia and Britain moving the chess-men represented by Afghan leaders and groups.

B.R. Rubin, A. Rashid, “From Great Game to Grand Bargain,” Foreign Affairs, November/December 2008, pp. 33.

See: Vystuplenie Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan Islama Karimova na sammite OBSE, Istanbul, 18 November, 1999.

See: Vystuplenie Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan Islama Karimova na sammite ShOS, Dushanbe, August 2008.

This is one of the “friction” situations that negatively affect the Afghan campaign (see: F. Tolipov, op. cit.).

B.R. Rubin, A. Rashid, op. cit., pp. 30, 31.

“Summit Declaration on Afghanistan Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of

the North Atlantic Council in Strasbourg / Kehl on 4 April, 2009, Press Release: (2009) 045, NATO 04 Apr. 2009,” avail-able at [http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_52836.htm?mode=pressrelease].

K. DeYoung, “Obama Outlines Afghan Strategy. He Pushes Stability and Regional Partnerships,” The Washing-ton Post, Saturday, 28 March, 2009, p. A01.

See: Vystuplenie Prezidenta Respubliki Uzbekistan Islama Karimova na sammite NATO/SEAP, Bucharest, 4 April,2008 (see also: I. Karimov, Po puti modernizatsii strany i ustoichivogo razvitiia ekonomiki, Tashkent, 2008, pp. 240-244).

Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Afghanistan: problemy stabilizatsii i perspektivy rekonstruktsii,” Tashkent,17-18 June, 2009.

Ibidem.

Downloads

Published

2009-12-31

Issue

Section

REGIONAL SECURITY

How to Cite

AKMALOV, S. (2009). AFGHANISTAN: ITS ROLE AND PLACE IN THE INTERNATIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 10(6), 18-23. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1315

Plaudit