A PUBLICIST DISCOURSE OF THE ISLAMIC ORGANIZATIONS OF THE CENTRAL FEDERAL DISTRICT OF RUSSIA AND THE ISSUE OF TOLERANCE
Abstract
Today, the publicist discourse is best described as a polyvariant space of an interaction of linguistic and non-linguistic factors that determine the use of words and styles and their functioning. Special attention should be paid to the addressees as active interpreters of electronic and printed publicist texts and to the “conflicting text” concept interpreted in the context of negative realization of the usual-stylistic complex. The necessity of the problem discussed is determined by the new tasks related to the texts and recently formulated by contemporary science, since the traditional paradigm, based on the mode of obligation, has been replaced with a new, post-modernist one, based on the mode of possibility. This global change presupposes an interest in the contemporary publicist discourse of Islamic organizations in the context of confrontation of the Christian and Islamic worlds. Externally, the media have arrived at a new level of subjects and presentation; internally, they are functioning at a new linguistic level. Today, the mass media shook off their former ideological and official biases and taboos on particular subjects, while information sources became more numerous and more varied. In the last few years, the world of the media has changed structurally and economically; it relies on different sources of funding and looks different. Digital newspapers and information agencies can be described as a new element, which is steadily widening its audiences; they are determined to finally outdo the TV, especially where the speed of the delivery of news is concerned. So far, neither the interested structures of state power nor the expert community have offered a more or less adequate concept of confessional politics. The subject of our studies is further made germane by the need to identify the mechanisms and technologies of politicization of Islam to offer new ways and means of ensuring social and state security. The authors who investigate the ways ethnoconfessional conflicts are effected concentrate on the institutional discourses and actors (the academic and political circles and the media) and tend to ignore the space of electronic mass media that publish online discussions of their readers, the de facto independent level of constructing social conflicts.
Downloads
References
See: T.V. Chernyshova, Sovremenny publitsistiches-kiy diskurs (kommunikativno-stilisticheskiy aspekt), Text-book, AltGY, Barnaul, 2003, p. 178.
See: L.P. Pidoymo, E.V. Buturlakina, “Sushchnost kategoriy ‘informatsionnoe obshchestvo’, ‘informatsionnaia eko-nomika’,” Sovremennaia ekonomika: problemy i resheniia, No. 4 (4), 2010, pp. 112-118.
See: L.E. Varakin, Globalnoe informatsionnoe obshchestvo: kriterii razvitiia i sotsialno-ekonomicheskie aspekty,International Communication Academy, Moscow, 2001, p. 43.
See: N.D. Golev, “Ob ob’ektivnosti i legitimnosti istochnikov lingvisticheskoy expertizy,” in: Iurislingistika-3. Prob-lemy iurislingvisticheskoy ekspertizy. Mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov, AltGU, Barnaul, 2002, pp. 14-29.
See: E.S. Tembotova, “Konfessionalniy internet-diskurs: rechevoy zhanr ‘voprosy sviashchennosluzhiteliu’,” Ph.D.
hesis in Philology, Nalchik, 2012, p. 3.
See: S.G. Kara-Murza, Manipuliatsia soznaniem, Algoritm, EKSMO Publishers, Moscow, 2009, p. 19.
See: I.S. Karabulatova, “Sovremenny elektronno-informatsionny diskurs kak indikator etnopoliticheskoy bezopasnosty:
ezhetnicheskaia tolerantnost vs etnokonÀiktogennost v XXI veke,” Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seria 2: Gumanitarnye nauki, No. 2,2016, pp. 3-14; I.S. Karabulatova, G.M. Rakisheva, A.B. Abibulaeva, “Transkulturniy konÀict kak etnosotsialnaia deviatsia sovremennogo mira v epokhu globalizatsii,” Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seria 2: Gumanitarnye nauki, No. 4, 2016, pp. 3-18.
See: V.E. Kostetsky, “Politicheskaia ideologiia kak forma obshchestvennogo soznaniia,” in: Elementy teorii politiki,Rostov University Press, Rostov-on-Don, 1991, pp. 205-218.
See: U. Eco, The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Indiana University Press, 1979.
See: E.B. Shestopal, Politicheskaia psikhologia, Aspekt Press, Moscow, 2007, p. 432.
See: H.D. Lasswell, “The Language of Power,” in: Language of Politics, Cambridge (Mass.), M.I.T. Press, 1965.
See: R. Wodak, Yazyk. Diskurs. Politika, Transl. from the English and German, Peremena, Volgograd, 1997, p. 139.
See: M.V. Gavrilova, Politicheskaia kommunikatsia XX veka, Izdatelstvo Nevskogo Instituta yazyka i kultury, St.
etersburg, 2008, p. 94.
See: A.P. Chudinov, “Metaforicheskoe modelirovanie obraza Rossii v sovremennom agitatsionno-politicheskom diskurse,” in: Yazyk. Sistema. Lichnost, Urals State Pedagogical University Press, Ekaterinburg, 2000, p. 346.
See: I. Khan, “Liudi mira pytaiutsia pomoch zhertvam rezni v Aleppo,” 16 December, 2016 [http://golosislama.com/
ews.php?id=30738], 16 December 2016.
See: E. Ermakova, M. Jilkisheva, G. Fayzullina, I. Karabulatova, Kh. Shagbanova, “The Media and Fiction: Postmod-ernist Discourse of Contemporary Terrorism in the Context of Apocalyptic Rhetoric,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17,Issue 2, 2016, pp. 61-69.
See: I. Karabulatova, B. Akhmetova, K. Shagbanova, E. Loskutova, F. Sayfulina, L. Zamalieva, I. Dyukov, M. Vykhrys-tyuk, “Shaping Positive Identity in the Context of Ethnocultural Information Security in the Struggle against the Islamic State,”Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, Issue 1, 2016, pp. 84-92.
See: P. Berger, Th. Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Penguin Books, 1966.
See: J.P. Lederach, Preparing for Peace ConÀict Transformation Across Cultures, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse,NY, 1995; J. Miklian, Nepal’s Terre Constructing an Ethnic ConÀict, Oslo PRJO Publications, 2009, p. 18; P. Misir, “The Social Construction of Race-Ethnic ConÀict in Guyana,” in: Governance, ConÀict Analysis and ConÀict Resolution, Kingston Ian Randle Publishers, 2007, pp. 214–230; V.S. Malakhov, “Simvolicheskoe proizvodstvo etnichnosti i konÀkt,” in: Yazyk i etniches-kiy konÀikt, Gendalf, Moscow, 2001, pp. 115-137; G. Osipov, I. Karabulatova, G. Shafranov-Kutsev, L. Kononova, B. Akhme-tova, E. Loskutova, G. Niyazova, “Ethnic Trauma and its Echo in Today’s Mental Picture of the World among the Peoples of the Post-Soviet States: An Interethnic ConÀicting Discourse Unfolding in Russia’s Ethnolinguistic Information Region,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2016, pp. 87-94; O.E. Khukhlaev, “Prichiny etnicheskogo konÀikta: postroenie sotsial-no-psikhologicheskoy tipologii,” in: Etnopsikhicheskie voprosy teorii i praktiki, MGPPU, Moscow, 2006, pp. 52-67.
See: M.F. Karamreza, “Voprosy bezopasnosti v kontekste traditsionnogo i sovremennogo islamskogo diskursa,” in:
oprosy politicheskoy nauki. Materialy II mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii (St. Petersburg, iyul 2016), Svoe izdatel-stvo, St. Petersburg, 2016, pp. 2-6.
A.J. Greimas, Semiotics and Language: An Analytical Dictionary, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1982;J. Derrida, Of Grammatology, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore & London, 1997; G. Deleuze, Difference and Rep-etition, Colombia University Press, New York, 1994.
See: K. Leonard, “American Muslim Politics: Discourses and Practices,” Ethnicities, Vol. 3 (2), 2003, pp. 147-181;M. Donald, Media-diskurs: analiz media-tekstov. Issledovanie media i kultury, The Institute of Applied Psychology “Hu-manities Center,” Moscow, 2013. 264 pp.; M. McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, MIT Press, Cam-bridge, London, 1994, p. 136; V. Taki, “Between Polizeistaat and Cordon Sanitaire: Epidemics and Police Reform during Russian Occupation of Moldavia and Wallachia, 1828-1834,” Ab Imperio, No. 4, 2008, pp. 75-112; S. McKenna, “A Critical Analysis of North American Business Leaders’ Neocolonial Discourse: Global Fears and Local Consequences,” Organization,Vol. 18, No. 3, 2011, pp. 387-406; M. McDonald, “Constructing Insecurity: Australian Security Discourse and Policy Post-2001,” International Relations, Vol. 19, 2005, pp. 297-320.
See: N.A. Ipatova, “Diskursivnaia model professionalnogo soobshchestva”, Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antrop-ologii, Vol. XII, No. 3, 2009, pp. 82-93; I.S. Karabulatova, P.V. Barsukov, I.V. Akhmetov, O.V. Mamatelashvili, F.F. Khizbul lin, “‘Network Wars’ as a New Type of Deviation Processes in the Modern Electronic and Information Society in the Context of Social and Economic Security,” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 6 (S3), 2015, pp. 150-159; P. Meylakhs,
Diskurs v presse i press diskursa—konstruirovanie problemy narkotikov v peterburgskikh SMI,” Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii, Vol. VII, No. 4, 2004, pp. 135-151; T.B. Ryabova, “Politicheskiy diskurs kak resurs ‘sozdaniia gendera’ v sovre-mennoy Rossii,” Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo, Vol. VIII, Issue 4 (32), 2006, pp. 307-320; P.V. Romanov, V.V. Shcheblanova,E.R. Yarskaya-Smirnova, “Zhenshchiny-terroristki v interpretativnykh modeliakh rossiyskikh SMI (diskurs-analiz gazetnykh publikatsiy),” Politicheskie issledovaniia, No. 6, 2003, pp. 144-154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
