CENTRAL ASIA AS SEEN FROM RUSSIA
Abstract
This is a survey of what has been written in Russia about Central Asia, of the subject range and scope of problems that our Russian colleagues have discussed in their works, and of what they think about the region’s future. For obvious reasons, the Russian public as a whole and political scientists and politicians as its part cannot remain indifferent to what is going in Central Asia. Until quite recently, Russia and Central Asia were parts of a single state; today they remain tied together by geographic and geopolitical proximity. For these reasons, the region is still part of Russia’s information expanse.
The Russian Federation, which has scored quite a few foreign policy successes, is still facing old and persisting problems and is coping with the new challenges that crop up in the contemporary world. The integration initiatives formulated by Russia are hailed by some of its post-Soviet partners and rejected (or even undermined) by others.
Russia, which is seeking a stronger position in Central Asia, has to take into account the fact that China, an equal (or in certain respects stronger) economic and political rival, is also present in the region. In this context, the West, as seen from Moscow, looks like the geopolitical counterbalance needed to trim Beijing’s great and soaring ambitions.
Afghanistan and China are two factors that Moscow cannot ignore when pursuing its otherwise independent Central Asian policy. It should be said that Kazakhstan has been and remains Russia’s closest ally and strategic partner.
In the context of Russia’s relations with Central Asia, the interests of the sides are not always identical, however there are no contradictions between them on the most important issues, including geopolitics and strategic security.
The positions and opinions of our Russian colleagues are highly important as factors directly affecting the Kremlin’s Central Asian policy.
Downloads
References
See: A.A. Kazantsev, Bolshaia igra s neizvestnymi pravilami: mirovaia politika i Tsentralnaia Azia, Nasledie Evrazii, Moscow, 2008.
See: Gody, kotorye izmenili Tsentralnuiu Aziiu, TsSPI-IV RAS, Moscow, 2009.
See: Piatnadtsat let, kotorye izmenili Tsentralnuiu Aziiu (1991-2006), TsSPI, Moscow, 2006.
See: I. Zviagelskaia, Stanovlenie gosudarstv Tsentralnoy Azii: politicheskie protsessy, Aspekt Press, Moscow,2009.
See: S.V. Zhukov, O.B. Reznikova, Tsentralnaia Azia i Kitay: ekonomicheskoe vzaimodeystvie v usloviiakh globali-zatsii, IMEMO RAS, Moscow, 2009.
See: G.I. Chufrin, Rossia v Tsentralnoy Azii, KISI, Almaty, 2010.
See: Novye tendentsii vo vneshney politike Rossii v Tsentralnoy Azii i na Kavkaze, ed. by G.I. Chufrin, IMEMO,Moscow, 2008.
See: Sostoianie i perspektivy vzaimodeystviia Rossii so stranami Tsentralnoy Azii i Zakavkazia, ed. by G.I. Chufrin,IMEMO, Moscow, 2009.
See: K. Meshcheriakov, Vneshniaia politika Rossii v Tsentralnoy Azii v 1991-2009 gody: osobennosti i problemy,St. Petersburg, 2010.
See: A. Bissenbaev, Ne vmeste. Rossia i strany Tsentralnoy Azii, Piter Publishers, St. Petersburg, 2011.
See: Vodno-energeticheskie resursy Tsentralnoy Azii: osnovnye problemy i perspektivy, SGU, Saratov, 2010.
See: A. Bogaturov, A. Dundich, E. Troitskiy, Tsentralnaia Azia: “otlozhenny neytralitet” i mezhdunarodnye ot-noshenia v 2000-kh godakh. Ocherki tekushchey politiki. Issue 4, NOFMO, Moscow, 2010; D. Malysheva, Tsentralnoazi-atskiy uzel mirovoy politiki, IMEMO RAS, Moscow, 2010.
See: Rossia-Kazakhstan-Evrosoiuz: realii i perspektivy vzaimodeystviia na Evro-Aziatskom prostranstve, FRL,Moscow, 2011.
See: A.F. Klimenko, Strategiia razvitiia Shankhaiskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva: problemy oborony i bezopas-nosti, IDV RAS, Moscow, 2010; Shankhaiskaia organizatsia sotrudnichestva: k novym rubezham razvitiia, Compiled by A.F. Klimenko, IDV RAS, Moscow, 2008; D.S. Popov, “O probleme rasshireniia Shankhaiskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva.
naliticheskiy obzor,” RISI, No. 4 (27), 2010; N.V. Serebriakova, Shanhaiskaia organizatsia sotrudnichestva: mnogosto-ronniy kompromiss v Tsentralnoy Azii, InfoRos, Moscow, 2011.
See: S.N. Abashin, Natsionalizm v Tsentralnoy Azii: v poiskakh identichnosti, Aleteyya, St. Petersburg, 2007.
See: Razvitie politicheskoy situatsii v gosudarstvakh Tsentralnoy Azii v kontekste transformatsii, IV RAS, Moscow,2010; Politicheskiy protsess v Tsentralnoy Azii: rezultaty, problemy, perspektivy, IV RAS/TsSPI, Moscow, 2011.
See: Tsentralnaia Azia v geopoliticheskikh protsessakh, ee nastoiashchee i budushchee, TsSOP, Moscow,2011.
See: Vneshnepoliticheskiy protsess v stranakh Vostoka, ed. by Prof. D.V. Streltsov, Aspekt Press, Moscow,2011.
See: Aziatskie energeticheskie stsenarii, ed. by S.V. Zhukov, Magistr, Moscow, 2012.
See: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia v Tsentralnoy Azii: sobytiia i dokumenty, Teaching aid, ed. by A.D. Bogaturov,Moscow, 2011.
See: E.A. Glushchenko, Rossia v Sredney Azii. Zavoevania i preobrazovania, Tsentrpoligraf, Moscow, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.