INTERNAL CONTRADICTIONS OF THE SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION

Authors

  • Adil KAUKENOV Senior Analyst, Agency for the Study of Investment Profitability (Astana, the Republic of Kazakhstan) Author

Keywords:

the SCO, China, Russia, Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, the U.S., NATO, geopolitics, Peace Mission, free trade area.

Abstract

In recent years, China has perceptibly strengthened its position in Central Asia largely due to the multisided cooperation format embodied by the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). From Beijing’s perspective, it is not only a key organization, but essentially a regional integration project. Moreover, Central Asia’s development is closely tied to the development of Xinjiang, in which the Chinese leadership is making large investments in order to eliminate the separatist moods in this unsettled region. Nevertheless, the SCO has substantial systemic contradictions that the new CPR leadership headed by Xi Jinping is trying to overcome.

The West initially had a passive attitude toward the SCO. At that time, the North Atlantic Alliance regarded the Shanghai Five as a structure that did not pose a threat to the West’s interests; on the contrary, it showed a decrease in Moscow’s previously dominating role in Central Asia due to the appearance of a new player—China. Later, however, as China’s cooperation with the region’s countries, primarily with Kazakhstan in the oil sector, started to mount, Washington began having a different opinion.

The SCO’s prospects for the Central Asian countries are determined by this organization’s capability to maintain the balance of power in the region. Moreover, the region’s countries are interested in acquiring additional investments and capital (Chinese) through the organization’s channels. An analysis of the main areas of development of this structure based on the interests of the Central Asian countries is required for a more precise definition of the SCO’s prospects for the region’s countries. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

“Putin: SNG ‘vesma polezny klub’ dlia vstrech posle razvoda,” Novye izvestia, 25 March, 2005, available at [http://

ww.newizv.ru/lenta/2005-03-25/21939-putin-sng-vesma-poleznyj-klub-dlja-vstrech-posle-razvoda.html].

See: A. Shustov, “V Kazakhstane obostrilas diskussiia otnositelno uchastiia strany v Tamozhennom Soiuze,” Internet newspaper Stoletie, 6 December, 2010, available at [http://www.stoletie.ru/zarubejie/nacionalisty_protiv_ts_245.htm].

See: M. Laumulin, Tsentralnaia Azia v zarubezhnoi politologii i mirovoi geopolitike, Vol. V, Almaty, 2009, p. 56.

See: “Kirghiziia prosit pomoshchi Rossii v podavlenii mezhnatsionalnogo konflikta,” Argumenty i fakty, 12 June,2010, available at [http://www.aif.ru/politics/article/35434].

See: A. Valsamaki, “Bolshie problemy malenkogo anklava Sokh,” Radio Azattyk, 13 June, 2013, available at [http://

us.azattyq.org/content/sokh-enclave-tension-between-kyrgyzstan-and-uzbekistan/24878950.html].

See: “O revoliutsii v Kyrgyzstane,” Vestnik Evrazii, No. 3, 2005, available at [http://www.eavest.ru/magasin/

rtikelen/2005-3.htm].

See: “Predstaviteli bolee 100 zarubezhnykh SMI pribyli v Urumchi dlia osveshcheniia besporiadkov “5 iuilia,”Xinhua Agency, 8 July, 2009, available at [http://www.russian.xinhuanet.com/russian/2009-07/08/content_904028.htm].

See: “Strany ShOS ne podtverdili priznanie nezavisimosti Abkhazii i Iuzhnoi Osetii,” APN, 28 August, 2008,available at [http://www.annews.ru/news/detail.php?ID=166016].

See: “Bush odnim iz pervykh byl proinformirovan Rossiei ob atake Gruzii na Tskhinvali, rasskazyvaet Nazarbaev,”Interfax-West Information Agency, 28 August, 2008, available at [http://www.interfax.by/news/world/45117].

See: “Model Universiteta ShOS,” Official website of SCO University, available at [http://uni-sco.ru/stat/3/stat_3.tml].

See: “Brzezinski predlagaet Pekinu vybrat mezhdu Moskvoi i Vashingtonom,” Voennoe obozrenie, 28 March, 2013,available at [http://topwar.ru/26007-bzhezinskiy-predlagaet-pekinu-vybrat-mezhdu-moskvoy-i-vashingtonom.html].

See: “Buddisty zhgut sosedei,” Gazeta RU, 2 May, 2013, available at [http://www.gazeta.ru/social/2013/04/30/5286769.html].

See: A. Kaukenov, “Pomozhet li OIS musulmanam Tailanda?” Exspert Kazakhstan, No. 37 (327), 19 September,2011, available at [http://expertonline.kz/a1648/].

See: V. Kravchenko, “Turkmendistan: igra na vyzhivanie,” ZN, 17 August, 2007, available at [http://gazeta.zn.ua/POLITICS/turkmenistan_igra_na_vyzhivanie.html].

See: M. Laumulin, “ShOS—grandiozny geopolitichesky blef. Vzgliad iz Kazakhstana,” Russie Nei Visions, No. 12,July 2006.

See: “Iran podal zaiavku na vstuplenie v ShOS,” IA Regnum, 24 March, 2008, available at [http://www.regnum.ru/ews/975605.html].

See: “ShOS gotova k rasshireniiu,” Rossiiskoe federalnoe izdanie VVP, No. 7 (57), 2010, available at [http://www.vprf.ru/archive/clause149.html].

See: A. Georgiev, “‘Mirnaia missiia’ vypolnima,” Voenno-promyshlennyy kurier, No. 31 (98), 24 August, 2005,available at [http://vpk-news.ru/articles/1242].

Downloads

Published

2013-04-30

Issue

Section

GEOPOLITICS AND SECURITY

How to Cite

KAUKENOV, A. (2013). INTERNAL CONTRADICTIONS OF THE SHANGHAI COOPERATION ORGANIZATION. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 14(2), 07-17. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1562

Plaudit

Similar Articles

11-20 of 1064

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.