KAZAKHSTAN AND NATO: EVALUATION OF COOPERATION PROSPECTS
Abstract
For eighteen years now, relations between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization have been steadily progressing and are characterized by positive dynamics. Kazakhstan views strategic partnership with NATO as an opportunity to integrate into the international security systems in order to reinforce national security by making use of the enormous military, technical, and economic potential that this organization and its members possess. In its cooperation with NATO, Kazakhstan is mainly looking to establish mutually advantageous and equal partnership that meets the republic’s present-day priorities in the military and defense sphere, in transforming and modernizing its armed forces, in counteracting the threats posed by terrorism and drug trafficking, in border security, science, and the environment.
Bilateral Kazakhstan-NATO cooperation is characterized by developed institutional mechanisms of partnership and a broad contractual-legal cooperation base. Kazakhstan is rendering NATO comprehensive assistance in carrying out the peacekeeping operation in Afghanistan, and subdivisions of the Kazakhstan armed forces are also participating in the post-conflict restoration of Iraq. Joint operational-tactical military exercises are held every year. In addition, Kazakhstan’s official policy regarding the development of cooperation with the North Atlantic Alliance has always been consistent: membership in the Alliance is not an officially declared goal of Kazakh foreign policy. And, as domestic politicians point out, Kazakhstan does not have any plans to join NATO in the future.1 Nor does the republic have any intentions of deploying the Alliance countries’ military facilities or armed forces in its territory, as certain other countries of the region have done.
On the other hand, since the collapse of the Soviet Union, NATO diplomacy has been keeping its sights on Kazakhstan, and the Organization is making insistent attempts to draw the republic into the orbit of Western influence by enlarging the format of partner programs. As we know, in the 1990s, NATO placed the main emphasis of its Central Asian strategy on partnership with Uzbekistan, but in so doing it did not downplay Kazakhstan’s role in any way. The thing is that Western strategists have always regarded Uzbekistan as an important element in the regional dimension, while Kazakhstan plays a principal role in implementing the Eurasian strategy as a whole.2
Downloads
References
See: M.M. Tazhin, “Natsional’naia bezopasnost—
to bezopasnost cheloveka,” Ekonomicheskie strategii—
sentral’naia Azia, No. 1, 2007, pp. 6-10.
See: M.T. Laumulin, “Interesy Zapada v Tsentral’noi Azii v novykh geopoliticheskikh usloviiakh,”in: Sotrudnichestvo stran Tsentral’noi Azii i SShA po obespecheniiu bezopasnosti v regione: materialy mezhd-unarodnoi konferentsii, ed. by M. Ashimbaev, J. Mennuti,Almaty, 2005, p. 69.
“Perspektivy sotrudnichestva Kazakhkstana s NATO,” IWPR, 19 March, 2007.
A. Chebotarev, “Shire krug. K itogam rizhskogo sammita NATO,” Ekspert Kazakhstan, 18 December, 2006.
M.T. Laumulin, Tsentral’naia Azia v sarubezhnoi politologii i mirovoi geopolitike, Vol. II: Vneshniaia politika i
strategia SShA na sovremennom etape i Tsentral’naia Asia, Kazakhstan Institute of Strategic Studies under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 2006, p. 178.
See: “Voennaia doktrina Respubliki Kazakhstan. Utverzhdena Ukazom Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 21 marta 2007 goda No. 299,” Kazakhstanskaia pravda, 7 April, 2007.
Ibidem.
[www.s-cica.org].
See: M. Laumulin, “Strategicheskie aspekty otnosheniy Kazakhstana s Zapadom: SSha, NATO,” in: Kazakhstan v sovremennom mire: realii i perspektivy, ed. by B. Sultanov, Kazakhstan Institute of Strategic Studies under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 2008, p. 156.
According to the data of the RK Ministry of Defense, available at [www.mod.kz].
See: M. Nurgaliev, “Kazakh-U.S. Military-Political Cooperation in the Context of U.S. Geopolitical Interests in Central Asia,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 2 (44), 2007, p. 61.
N. Nazarbaev, Strategiia vkhozhdenia Kazakhstana v chislo 50-ti naibolee konkurentosposobnykh stran mira.
azakhstan na poroge novogo ryvka vpered v svoem razvitii: poslanie Presidenta narodu Kazakhstana, 1 March, 2006,available at [http://www.akorda.kz].
D. Satpaev, “NATO i Kazakhstan khotiat bolshei blizosti,” available at [www.liter.kz].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
