TWO DECADES OF REPRESSION: THE PERSISTENCE OF AUTHORITARIAN CONTROLS ON THE MASS MEDIA IN CENTRAL ASIA
Abstract
Dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 gave birth to five independent nations in Central Asia—Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan—with initial aspirations for an imminent transition from communism toward democracy. After twenty years, however, none has developed anything close to a free press system or otherwise emerged from post-communist authoritarianism. To the contrary, each representation regime—meaning both authoritarian in governance and repressive in human rights practices—imposes extensive official and extra-official constraints on the mass media. Those constraints apply both to traditional outlets such as newspapers and broadcast stations and, increasingly, to new media such as news-related websites and blogs. After an overview of the Soviet press system, this article describes some of the abysmal restrictions confronting journalists and news organizations in contemporary Central Asia. It then suggests some factors that may explain the dearth of free press systems there, examines the impact of Western trainers and educators, and highlights limitations on the Internet’s ability to provide the public with alternative sources of news, information, and opinion. It ends with a pessimistic prognosis for development of sustainable free press systems. In the first years of independence, the five governments understandably regarded the press as a unifying tool to nurture national identity and a sense of statehood among their ethnically and linguistically diverse populations.1 That role for the press provided a relatively easy psychological transition for professional journalists. That is because they were educated, trained, and experienced in a system where the press served as a tightly controlled mouthpiece for the Communist Party, Marxist-Leninist philosophy, and the central government in distant Moscow.2 It was also a logical approach for the new national leaders, all of whom had headed their pre-independence Soviet republics. Yet such an advocacy-boosterism persona for the press deterred and discouraged many highly motivated journalists—especially new professionals and those who had chafed under the Soviet-era propagandizing mission—from pursuing fact-based, objective journalism based on a commitment to fairness, balance, ethics, and accuracy.
Downloads
References
See: F. Muminova, “National Identity, National Mentality, and the Media,” Central Asia and the Caucasus,No. 5 (17), 2002.
See: N. Krasnoboka, “Between the Rejected Past and an Uncertain Future: Russian Media Studies at a Cross-roads,” in: Communication Yearbook 34, ed. by Ch.T. Salm-on, Routledge, New York, 2010, pp. 317-345; R. Shafer,E. Freedman, Journalism Education and the Press in Cen-tral Asia: Soviet Foundations of the Post-Independence Era, Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication. 2010; Th.C. Wolfe,
Governing Soviet Journalism: The Press and the Socialist Person after Stalin. Indiana University Press, Blooming-ton, Ind., 2005; E. Androunas, Soviet Media in Transition: Structural and Economic Alternatives, Praeger, Westport, Conn., 1993.
See: Freedom of the Press 2010, Freedom House, Washington, 2010, available at [www.freedomhouse.org].
See: Media Sustainability Index 2010: Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia, International Research & Exchanges Board, Washington,2010.
See: “Internet Enemies: Turkmenistan,” Reporters without Borders, 2010, available at [http://en.rsf.org/inter-net-enemie-turkmenistan,36692.html].
See: “Kyrgyz Agents Raid TV Station, Interrogate Director,” Press Release, Committee to Protect Journalists,13 July, 2010.
See: M.E. Lenoe, Closer to the Masses: Stalinist Culture, Social Revolution, and Soviet Newspapers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2004, pp. 37-38.
See: Ibidem.
See: N. Krasnoboka, op. cit.
Unless cited to another source, information in this section is drawn from the U.S. Department of State; Committee to Protect Journalists; Freedom House; Reporters without Borders; Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty; International Research & Exchanges Board; International Media Support; Eurasietnet.org; Institute for War & Peace Reporting; and International Freedom of Expression exchange.
E. Freedman, “When a Democratic Revolution isn’t Democratic or Revolutionary,” Journalism, Vol. 10, No. 6,2009, p. 844.
J. Rubin, “Transitions—A Regional Summary,” Media Studies Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1999, p. 60.
See: A. Puddington, “The Pushback against Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2007, p. 125.
J.L. Brown, “Mass Media in Transition in Central Asia,” International Communication Gazette, Vol. 54, 1995,p. 249.
For example, in August 2010, the president of Kazakhstan announced that more than 2,600 mass media “are successfully developing” in the country (“Over 2,600 Mass Media Successfully Develop in Kazakhstan—President,” Kaz-inform, 27 August, 2010, available at [http://kazinform.kz/eng/article/2298208]), although the International Research & Exchanges Board (see: Media Sustainability Index 2010: Development of Sustainable Independent Media in Europe and Eurasia, International Research & Exchanges Board, Washington, 2010) tallied only about 1,000 active media outlets there. Similarly, IREX tallied 250 active print and 32 TV and radio outlets in Kyrgyzstan, while the Central Election Commission reportedly accredited 136 newspapers and 33 broadcasters (see: “CEC Accredits 175 Mass Media, "KABAR, 25 August 2010, available at [http://eng.kabar.kg/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=948&Itemid=3]).
“Kazakhstan’s President Welcomes Decision to Hold OSCE Summit in December in Astana,” Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, 2010, available at [www.osce.org/item/45662.html].
N. Ognianova, “Denied Access, CPJ Manages to Interview Kazakh Prisoner,” 10 June, 2010.
“CPJ Decries Charges against Journalists in Kyrgyzstan,” Press Release, Committee to Protect Journalists, 12 August,2010.
See: “Further Restrictions on Foreign Press in Turkmenistan,” News Briefing Central Asia, 3 September 2010, available at [http://iwpr.net/report-news/further-restrictions-foreign-press-turkmenistan].
“2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices,” U.S. Department of State, 11 March 2010, available at [www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2009/index.htm].
Ibidem.
See: R.B. Nixon, “Factors Related to Freedom in National Press Systems,” Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 1,1960, pp. 9-14; D.M. Gilmor, “Freedom in Press Systems and the Religious Variable,” Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 39, 1962,pp. 15-26; V. Farace, L. Donohew, “Mass Communication in National Social Systems: A Study of 43 Variables in 115 Coun-tries,” Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 42, 1965, pp. 253-261.
See: C. Connelly-Ahern, J.G. Guy, “Press Freedom and Religion: Measuring the Association between Press Free-dom and Religious Composition.” Journal of Media and Religion, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2007, pp. 63-76.
See: R. Shafer, E. Freedman, “Press Constraints as Obstacles to Establishing Civil Societies in Central Asia,” Journalism Studies, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2009, pp. 851-869.
See: E. Freedman, Dimming Lights and Deepening Shadows over Press Rights in Kyrgyzstan, Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, 2010; M.J. Namecek, J. Maureen, S. Ketterer,G. Ibrayeva, S. Los, “Journalism Education and Professional Training in Kazakhstan: From the Soviet Era to Independence,”in: After the Czars and Commissars: Journalism in Authoritarian Post-Soviet Central Asia, ed. by E. Freedman, R. Shafer,Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Mich. (forthcoming); G. Pitts, “Professionalism among Journalists in Kyr-gyzstan,” in: After the Czars and Commissars: Journalism in Authoritarian Post-Soviet Central Asia.
See: P. Gross, T. Kenny, “Journalistic Self-Censorship and the Tajik Press in the Context of Central Asia,” in: After the Czars and Commissars: Journalism in Authoritarian Post-Soviet Central Asia; E. Freedman, “Dimming Lights and Deepening Shadows over Press Rights in Kyrgyzstan.”
E. Mamyrkanov, “Remarks, ‘How Does Self-Censorship Affect the Coverage of Political Conflicts?’” Institute for Public Policy, 2009, p. 8.
A. Tynaev, “Remarks, ‘How Does Self-Censorship Affect the Coverage of Political Conflicts?’” Institute for Public Policy, 2009, p. 6.
C. Offe, “Cultural Aspects of Consolidation: A Note on the Peculiarities of Postcommunist Transformations,”Eastern European Constitutional Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1997, available at [www1.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol6num4/special/Culturalaspects.html. 67].
A. Nelson, U.S. Universities and Media Development, Report to the Center for International Media Assistance,2010, available at [http://cima.ned.org/sites/default/files/CIMA-US_Universities_and_Media_Development-Report.pdf. 4].
Ibid., p. 6.
R. Fawn, “‘Bashing about Rights’? Russia and the ‘New’ EU States on Human Rights and Democracy Promotion, "Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 61, No. 10, 2010, p. 1788.
See: Freedom of the Press 2010, Freedom House, Washington, 2010, available at [www.freedomhouse.org].
M. Corso, “Media Training in Georgia: How Much Bang for the Buck?” Eurasianet.org, 24 June, 2010.
Unless cited to another source, information in this section is drawn from the U.S. Department of State; Commit-tee to Protect Journalists; Freedom House; Reporters without Borders; Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty; International Research & Exchanges Board; International Media Support; Eurasietnet.org; Institute for War & Peace Reporting; and In-ternational Freedom of Expression eXchange.
See: S.V. Kulikova, D.D. Perlmutter, “Blogging Down the Dictator: The Kyrgyz Revolution and Samizdat Websites,” International Communication Gazette, Vol. 69, No. 1, 2007, pp. 29-50
“Internet Enemies: Uzbekistan,” Reporters without Borders, 2010, available at [http://en.rsf.org/internet-enemie-uzbekistan,36688.html].
R. Safin, “Online Journalism in Kyrgyzstan: Problems and Prospects,” Institute for Public Policy, 23 September,
See: “Internet Enemies: Turkmenistan,” Reporters without Borders, 2010, available at [http://en.rsf.org/internet-enemie-turkmenistan,36692.html].
Zh. Kozhamberdiyeva, “Freedom of Expression on the Internet: A Case Study of Uzbekistan,” Review of Central & East European Law, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2008, pp. 95-134.
See: K.M. Kohlmeier, N. Nekbakhtshoev, “Internet Libel Law and Freedom of Expression in Tajikistan,” in: Af-ter the Czars and Commissars: Journalism in Authoritarian Post-Soviet Central Asia.
See: “OSCE Centre Organizes Course on Combating Corruption for Civil Society, Media in Southern Kazakhstan, "Press Release, Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, 23 August 2010.
U.S. Embassy, Kyrgyzstan, 2010, available at [www.facebook.com/usembassy.bishkek].
See: F. Najibullah, “Daily Ambitions,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 30 August, 2010.
See: A. Khan, “Scepticism over Independent Press Pledge in Turkmenistan,” Institute for War & Peace Reporting,RCA 615, 2 August, 2010.
See: D. Mijatoviæ, Regular Report to the Permanent Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, available at [www.osce.org/documents/html/pdftohtml/45552_en.pdf.html], 29 July, 2010.
Ibidem.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
