Enhancing Collaborative Learning Skills via Blended Problem-based Learning in Chemistry Learning
Keywords:
Problem-based Learning, Blended Problem-based Learning, Three Representations Levels of ChemistryAbstract
Poor mastery of three representation levels of Chemistry (macroscopic, microscopic and symbolic) has affected students’ academic performances. This is resulted from the traditional teaching that is teacher-centred and does not encourage students’ active participation. Potentially, Blended Problem–based Learning (BPBL) approach that integrates both face-to-face and online learning platforms focuses on students’ active involvement, especially collaborative skills (knowledge sharing, conflict resolution and reflective skills). Hence, the current study is aimed at exploring how BPBL can enhance these collaborative skills during learning activities in Chemistry learning. This study employed a qualitative approach - exploratory and explanatory case study. Through purposive sampling, two teachers and 20 students from two schools were selected. Data from observations, students’ documents and interviews were collected and analysed thematically. The findings suggested that BPBL approach can enhance the students’ collaborative learning experiences and skills. Firstly, the students demonstrated that they were able to share knowledge by: a) agreeing on the objectives of the problem, b) sharing what they have learned, and c) evaluating their info and others. Secondly, the students were able to resolve conflicts as they demonstrated their ability to: a) identify how the information is collected, and b) reevaluate their own information and of others. Lastly, the students were able to conduct reflection during the lessons as they: a) reflect and identify concepts that they struggle with, b) make generalization of the current findings to other relevant problems, c) reflect their overall action plan in solving the learning issues, and d) evaluate their own performance and of the group members throughout the learning process. In short, this study has provided valuable information on how BPBL can help enhance students’ collaborative learning skills during the teaching and learning process.
Downloads
References
Lee, M.N.N., Education in Malaysia: towards vision 2020. School effectiveness and school improvement, 1999. 10(1): p. 86-98.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/sesi.10.1.86.3514.
Halim, N.D.A., E.E.A. Bakar, and N.S.A. Alhassora, The Effect of Cooperative Learning Activity in Blossoms Lesson towards Students’ Critical Thinking in Learning Chemistry. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), 2019. 3(1): p. 1-10.
Ibrahim, M.M., et al., The roles of teacher and students in self-directed learning process through blended problem-based learning. Sains humanika, 2017. 9(1-4).DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-4.1121.
Tan, Y.P. and M.Y. Arshad, FILA-MMS Chart in Chemistry PBL Lesson : A Case Study of Its Implementation During Problem Analysis. In Proceeding of The 4th International Research Research Symposium on Problem-Based Learning (IRSPBL) 2013, 154–162. 2013.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p174.
Nasri, M.A., N. Yahaya, and N.H. Ibrahim, Assessment of students' mental models regarding hydrogen chloride molecule and its ionisation properties among secondary school students. Man in India, 97(13), 41–49. 2017.
Omar, S.Z., et al., Chemistry modelling skills: students’ understanding on chemical representations at the microscopic level. Advanced Science Letters, 2017. 23(9): p. 8127-8130.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9847.
Sim, W.S.L. and M.Y. Arshad, A Preliminary Study Of Chemistry Teachers' Question In Inquiry Teaching. Sains Humanika. 2(4), 217-224. . 2010.
Tan, Y.P. and M.Y. Arshad, Teacher and Student Questions: A Case Study in Malaysian Secondary School Problem-Based Learning. Asian Social Science, 10 (4), 174-182. 2014.
Davidowitz, B. and G. Chittleborough, Linking the macroscopic and sub-microscopic levels: Diagrams, in Multiple representations in chemical education. 2009, Springer. p. 169-191.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_9.
Dori, Y.J. and Z. Kaberman, Assessing high school chemistry students’ modeling sub-skills in a computerized molecular modeling learning environment. Instructional Science, 2012. 40(1): p. 69- 91.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9172-7.
Gedik, N., E. Kiraz, and M.Y. Ozden, Design of a blended learning environment: Considerations and implementation issues. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2013. 29(1).DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6.
Muhammad, S., et al., Authentic Chemistry Problem Solving Competency for Open-ended Problems in Learning Electrolysis: Preliminary Study. In Proceedings of The International Conference On Education And Higher Order Thinking Skills ( pp 365). Skudai. University Technolgy Malaysia. . 2016.
Jones, M.G. and L. Brader-Araje, The impact of constructivism on education: Language, discourse, and meaning. American Communication Journal, 2002. 5(3): p. 1-10.
Piaget, J., Piaget’s theory, in Piaget and his school. 1976, Springer. p. 11-23.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46323-5_2.
Vygotsky, L. and M. Cole, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1978.
Barrows, H.S., The tutorial process. 1988: Southern Illinois University, School of medicine.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational psychology review, 2004. 16(3): p. 235-266.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. and H.S. Barrows, Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and instruction, 2008. 26(1): p. 48-94.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329702000405.
Ibrahim, M.M., M.Y. Arshad, and M.S. Rosli, The need of an integrated framework for the implementation of blended problem-based learning. International Education Studies, 2015. 8(13): p. 33- 40.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n13p33.
Shimizul, et al., Does blended problem-based learning make Asian medical students active learners?: a prospective comparative study. BMC Medical Education, 19(147), 2-9. 2019.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1575-1.
Gao, F., T. Zhang, and T. Franklin, Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2013. 44(3): p. 469- 483.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x.
Qiu, M. and D. McDougall, Foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses: Advantages and disadvantages of online versus face-to-face subgroup discourse. Computers & Education, 67, 1–11. . 2013.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.005.
Sahni, J., Does Blended Learning Enhance Student Engagement? Evidence from Higher Education. Journal of e-Learning and Higher Education, 1-14. . 2019.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2019.121518.
Hmelo, C.E. and M. Ferrari, The problem-based learning tutorial: Cultivating higher order thinking skills. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1997. 20(4): p. 401-422.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
Ibrahim, M. and K.A. Jamaludin, The roles of teacher and students via blended problem-based learning: Improving students’ mastery of three representation levels of chemistry. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 2019. 6(2): p. 9-21.DOI: https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol6.2.2.2019.
Von Glasersfeld, E., Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and understanding. London: Falmer. doi, 1995. 10: p. 9780203454220.
Wirkala, C., Probelm-Based Learning in K-12 Education: Is it Effective and How Does it Achieve its Effects? (Columbia University)(Doctoral Thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertation & Theses database. (UMI No. 3451518). 2011.DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211419491.
Heng, L.L., J.B. Surif, and C.H. Seng, Individual versus group argumentation: Student's performance in a Malaysian context. 2014.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109.
Hung, W., Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2011. 59(4): p. 529-552.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423- 011-9198-1.
Dillenbourg, P., What do you mean by collaborative learning, 1-19. 1999, Citeseer.
Collazos, C., L.A. Guerrero, and J.A. Pino, Computational design principles to support the monitoring of collaborative learning processes. Journal of Advanced Technology for Learning, 2004. 1(3): p. 174- 180.DOI: https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.208.2004.3.208-0815.
Ho, W., An exploration of peer collaboration and group problem solving process in a college problem- based learning classroom, 1-24. 2008: The Pennsylvania State University.
Azer, S.A. and D. Azer, Group interaction in problem‐based learning tutorials: a systematic review.European Journal of Dental Education, 2015. 19(4): p. 194-208.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12121.
Donnelly, R., Blended problem‐based learning for teacher education: lessons learnt. Learning, Media and Technology, 2006. 31(2): p. 93-116.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880600756621.
Merriam, S.B., Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Revised and Expanded from" Case Study Research in Education.". Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St, San Francisco, CA 94104. 1998.
Donnelly, R., Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & education, 2010. 54(2): p. 350-359.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.012.
Mannan, F., et al., Predictive validity of gender and experience of teachers into Malaysian women principal’s instructional leadership practices. MOJEM: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 2017. 4(3): p. 52-67.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol4no3.4.
Alias, M. and H.H.M. Saleh, The effect of the blended Problem-Based Learning method on the acquisition of content-specific knowledge in mechanical engineering. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2007. 6(2): p. 249.
Shahbodin, F. and H. Badioze, Evaluating the effectiveness problem based learning in science teaching: Hybrid approach. International Symposium on Information Technology. 26-28 August. Kuala Lumpur: IEEE, 1–7. . 2008.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631589.
Creswell, J.W., Quaitative Inquiry & Research Design (L. Habib, K. Koscielak, B. Bauhaus, & M. Masson eds.) Third. edition). California: Vicky Knight. 2013.
Yew, E.H.J. and H.G. Schmidt, Evidence for constructive, self-regulatory, and collaborative process in problem-based learning. Adv in Health Sci Educ, 14, 251–273. . 2008.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9105-7.
Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Method (V. Knight (ed.) (5th ed.). Califirnia: Sage Publications, Inc. 2009.
Chua, K.J., S.K. Chou, and W.M. Yang, Advances in heat pump systems: A review. Applied energy, 2010. 87(12): p. 3611-3624.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.014.
Haidet, K.K., et al., Methods to improve reliability of video‐recorded behavioral data. Research in nursing & health, 2009. 32(4): p. 465-474.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20334.
Abubakar, A.B. and M.Y. Arshad, Collaborative learning and skills of problem-based learning: A case of Nigerian secondary schools chemistry students. Asian Social Science, 2015. 11(27): p. 53.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n27p53.
Ismail, S.A., D. Dorner, and G. Oliver. Issues Related to Information Literacy: Education in Malaysian Schools.
Duit, R. and D.F. Treagust, Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International journal of science education, 2003. 25(6): p. 671-688.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016.
McLoughlin, D. and J. Mynard, An analysis of higher order thinking in online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2009. 46(2): p. 147-160.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843778.
Taber, K.S., Alternative Conceptions and the Learning of Chemistry. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59 (5- 7), 450-469. . 2019.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201800046.
Takahashi, S. and E. Saito, Unraveling the process and meaning of problem-based learning experiences. Higher Education, 66(6), 693–706. . 2013.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9629-5.
Visschers-Pleijers, D., D, et al., Analysis of verbal interaction in tutorial groups: A process study. Medical Education, 40 (2), 129-137. . 2006.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02368.x.
Aarnio, M., et al., Dealing with conflicts on knowledge in tutorial groups. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2013. 18(2): p. 215-230.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9366-z.
Barrows, H.S. and R.M. Tamblyn, Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Vol. 1. 1980: Springer Publishing Company.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
