ON THE ROLE OF THE CENTRAL ASIAN COOPERATION ORGANIZATION WITHIN THE SCO
Abstract
The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) is over seven years old; it started as the Shanghai Five (Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan) set up at the Shanghai summit of 26 April 1996, which signed the Treaty on Deepening Military Trust in Border Regions. Since that time summits have developed into a regular feature. The second summit held in Moscow on 24 April, 1997 adopted the Treaty on the Reduction of Military Forces in Border Regions.
The third summit held on 3 July 1998 in Almaty concentrated on further strengthening confidence and stability in the region and enhancing trade and economic cooperation.
The fourth summit held on 24 August 1999 in Bishkek signed a Joint Declaration on Combating National Separatism, Religious Extremism, and Transborder Crime.
The fifth summit was held on 4-5 July 2000 in Dushanbe; it discussed problems of regional security and stability, cooperation in fighting international terrorism and religious extremism, as well as border problems. Attended by President of Uzbekistan Islam Karimov it signed the Dushanbe Declaration and passed a decision on transforming the organization into the Shanghai Forum.
The sixth summit held in Shanghai on 15 June 2001 adopted a Declaration on the Establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and a Convention on Combating Terrorism, Separatism, and Extremism.
The seventh summit held on 7 June 2002 in St. Petersburg adopted the SCO Charter, the Agreement on Setting Up the Regional Antiterrorist Organization (RATO), with its center in Bishkek, and the Declaration by the Heads of Member States of the SCO.
The eighth summit met in Moscow on 29 May 2003 to make two important decisions: on the SCO Secretariat to be set up in Shanghai and on the transfer of the RATO headquarters from Bishkek to Tashkent.
Uzbekistan became the new SCO chairman. The president of the member states endorsed a set of normative documents related to the way the SCO structures (its financial mechanism included) should function. Adopted a financial charter dealing with the procedure for forming and executing the SCO’s budget, as well as setting forth the provisions on the councils of the heads of state, heads of government, foreign ministers, and national coordinators. The Moscow summit also adopted a document on the SCO secretariat, conferences of the ministry and department heads, and permanent representatives of the member states at the Secretariat, as well as on the operating rules for the RATO headquarters.
Downloads
References
See: S. Luzianin, “‘Shankhaiskaia shesterka’ uzhe nikogo ne ustraivaet,” Nezavisimaia gazeta, 6 June, 2002.
D. Trofimov, “Shanghai Process: From the ‘Five’ to the Cooperation Organization. Summing up the 1990s and Looking Ahead,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 2 (14), 2002, pp. 89, 90.
Ibid., p. 92.
Quoted from: X. Guangcheng, “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the Fight against Terrorism, Extremism, and Separatism,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 4 (16), 2002, p. 16.
P. Guang, “Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the Context of International Antiterrorist Campaign,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 3 (21), 2003, p. 49.
M. Oresman, “The Moscow Summit: Tempered Hope for the SCO,” Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, Wednesday, 4 June,2003.
See: M. Oresman, “Judging the Future Success of the SCO,” CEF Monthly, October 2003, China-Eurasia Forum [http://
ww.chinaeurasia.org/Newsletter.html].
See: J. Nye, “What New World Order?” Foreign Affairs, Spring 1992.
An analysis of the counterterrorist operation in Afghanistan, for example, suggests a conclusion that the world commu-nity’s antiterrorist struggle that brought the nations closer together and geopolitical rivalry in Southern and Central Asia that breeds conflicts and disunite the nations have complemented one another in an amazing way (see: F. Tolipov, “Ispytanie geopolitiki terrorizmom i antiterrorizmom,” SShA-Kanada: EPI, No. 3, 2002).
See: M. Oresman, “Judging the Future Success of the SCO.”
“Vstrecha liderov ShOS v Moskve,” Vesti.ru, 29 May, 2003.
M. Du Mont, “That Other Central Asian Collective Security Organization — the CSTO,” CEF Monthly, January 2004,China-Eurasia Forum [http://www.chinaeurasia.org/Newsletter.html].
R. Burnashev, “‘Shankhaiskaia piaterka’: k voprosu o regional’noy politike Uzbekistana,” Agentstvo politicheskikh issle-dovaniy [http://www.caapr.kz], 18 June, 2001.
Ibidem.
See: F. Tolipov, “Are the Heartland and Rimland Changing in the Wake of the Operation in Afghanistan?” Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 5 (23), 2003, pp. 105-106.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2004 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
