CENTRAL ASIA AS A SPACE, POLITY, PEOPLES, AND FATE
Abstract
The study of contemporary Central Asian counters problems of ontology and conceptualization. Not only current scholarly works on Central Asia, especially after 11 September 2001, but also recent post-independence studies of the region lack adequate and strong scientific approaches. The spectrum of incorrect views on Central Asia ranges from assertions about Uzbekistan’s expansionism and hegemonism in the region and a prognosis of the “Balkanization” of Central Asia to rejection of the applicability of the regional integration concept with regard to the five countries of the region on the grounds that their cultures and political systems are too different. What is more, most locals, that is, Central Asians themselves, have been carried away by the perceptional works Western scholars have presented to them and written about them. What is Central Asia? For Westerners it is there, for locals it is here. Is it strictly definable? People have an idea of America, an idea of Europe, an idea of Eurasia, etc. Does anyone have an idea of Central Asia? I cannot help but recall Edward Said’s research. An interesting methodological warning can be found in his Orientalism that as both geographical and cultural entities—to say nothing of historical entities—such locales, regions, geo CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS graphical sectors as “Orient” and “Occident” are man-made. “Therefore, as much as the West itself, the Orient is an idea that has a history and a tradition of thought, imagery, and vocabulary that have given it reality and presence in and for the West.” 1 I believe this kind of contemplation can be applied to Central Asia. It is not an attempt to replace all the lies with the truth, all the myths with real history, and all the conjectures and prejudices with stringent and absolute definitions of Central Asia. It is only an attempt to make up for the insufficiently positive approach to the region from the viewpoint of the historical predisposition of its countries and peoples to integration.
Downloads
References
E. Said, Orientalism, Vintage Books, New York, 1979, p. 5.
For more detail, see: Tsentral’naia Azia: geoekonomika, geopolitika, bezobasnost, ed. by R. Alimov, Sh. Arifkhanov, S. Rizaev, and F. Tolipov, Shark, Tashkent, 2002.
R.H. Munro, “China, India, and Central Asia,” in: After Empire. The Emerging Geopolitics of Central Asia, ed. by J. Snyder, National Defense University Press, Washington, 1995, p. 130.
5 See: F. Tolipov, «Certain Theoretical Aspects of Central Asian Geopolitics,» Central Asia and the Caucasus, No. 6 (12), 2001.
See: F. Tolipov, “Nationalism as a Geopolitical Phenomenon: the Central Asian Case,” Central Asian Survey, No. 2, 2001.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2005 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
