REPRODUCTIVE AND MIGRATION ATTITUDES OF CONTEMPORARY YOUTH OF THE EAEU STATES (RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN: A CASE STUDY)

Authors

  • Evgenia SIGAREVA Ph.D. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute for Demographic Studies, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences (IDR FCTAS RAS) (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Svetlana SIVOPLYASOVA Ph.D. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Institute for Demographic Studies, Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences (IDR FCTAS RAS); Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University) (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author

Keywords:

reproductive behavior, sociological survey, birth rate, number of children, gender, migratory behavior, youth, Central Asia, Russia, respondents

Abstract

The article is devoted to the current aspects of demographic development in the EAEU member states in the context of studying the specifics of the reproductive and migratory behavior of young people in Russia, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The modern generation of young people in post-Soviet countries over the past three decades has been influenced by various factors that have radically transformed their views on family, childbirth and migration. Their attitudes towards reproductive and migratory behavior will dominate the future demographic trends not only in each of the studied countries, but also in the Eurasian space as a whole. Therefore, a detailed study of the attitudes of the young and educated generation is the most important task of demographic and sociological sciences. Based on the results of a sociological survey conducted using a united methodology, the article examines the features of reproductive and migratory behavior in countries at different stages of the “demographic transition.” It reveals the peculiarities of the respondents’ attitude from the three states to official marriage, age preferences for starting a family and giving birth to their first child. Reproductive judgments regarding anticipated and ideal number of children are identified. The use of the ranking method allowed to detect the normative childbearing models in the three countries and the differences between them. The conclusion states that in all the states in question, the prevailing socio-economic conditions are an obstacle to the implementation of the existing ideal reproductive attitudes. The gender peculiarities of the views of young people in the three countries on extramarital unions, re- productive patterns and “planned childlessness” were noted. The article demonstrates that, with regard to the results of the study, in the next 25 to 30 years families in Russia will likely have a small number of children, in Kazakhstan—an average number, and re- productive behavior in Kyrgyzstan will likely retain its tendency towards having many children.
The article also contains conclusions about specific migration attitudes based on the replies to questions about the preferred place to apply professional skills, create a family and have children. The dependence of migration attitudes on gender and country of residence has been revealed. Based on empirical data, the groups of respondents characterized by pragmatic, patriotic and antipatriotic migratory behavior have been identified. It was determined that young people who live in Kyrgyzstan are more focused on moving to a new place of residence, while all respondents are quite cosmopolitan in regard to the place of application of their professional skills, and students are most patriotic about the place to start a family.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: L.L. Rybakovsky, Migratsiia naseleniia (voprosy teorii), Moscow, 2003, available at [http://rybakovsky.2 The former Institute of Socio-Political Research, Russian Academy of Sciences.

See: New text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation with additions and amendments adopted in 2020, available in Russian at [http://duma.gov.ru/news/48953/].

See: J.B. Watson, Psychological Care of Infant and Child, First Edition, W.W. Norton & Comp., New York, 1928.

See: B.F. Skinner, Science and Human Behavior, Free Press, New York, 1965.

ru/ migracia2.html], 2 September, 2020.

See: V.A. Borisov, Demogra

See: A.I. Antonov, Sotsiologiia rozhdaemosti, Moscow, 1980.

See: V.N. Arkhangelsky, “Reproduktivnoe i brachnoe povedenie,” Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, No. 2, February 2013, pp. 129-136.

See: D.I. Valentey, A.Ya. Kvasha, “Osnovy demografii: [Textbook], Mysl Publishers, Moscow, 1989, 284 pp.

See: A.G. Vishnevsky, Izbrannye demogra

See: V.V. Elizarov, Perspektivy issledovaniy sem’i, Moscow, 1987.

See: Migratsiia selskogo naseleniia, ed. by T.I. Zaslavskaia, Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Mysl Publishers, Moscow, 1970, 312 pp.

See: Zh.A. Zayonchkovskaya, “Migratsiia,” in: Naselenie Rossii 1994, Moscow, 1994.

See: V.A. Iontsev, Mezhdunarodnaia migratsiia: naseleniia: teoriia i istoriia izucheniia, Issue 3, Dialog-MGU, Moscow, 1999, 370 pp.

See: V.I. Perevedentsev, Metody izucheniia migratsii naseleniia, Nauka Publishers, Moscow, 1975.

See: L.L. Rybakovsky, op. cit.

See: Nauchnoe obozrenie, Series 1: Economics and Law, No. 3, 2020.

See: T.K. Rostovskaia, A.A. Shabunova, V.N. Arkhangelsky et al., Demogra

See: A.G. Grishanova, N.I. Kozhevnikova, E.S. Krasinets, “Migratsionnye problemy soiuznogo gosudarstva v period pandemii,” in: Instituty razvitiia chelovecheskogo potentsiala v usloviiakh sovremennykh vyzovov: sbornik statey XI Uralskogo demogra

See: E. Shcherbakova, “The Average Age of a Mother at Childbirth Remained Quite Stable: Its Median Value for All Countries of the World was 28.8 Years in the 1970s, and 28.7 in the 2000s,” available at [http://www.demoscope.ru/ weekly/2011/0489/barom03.php].

See: S.G. Ivchenkov, M.S. Ivchenkova, “Osobennosti reproduktivnykh ustanovok sovremennoi molodezhi: mneniia ekspertov i realnost,” Alma Mater (Bulletin of the Higher School), No. 11, 2020, pp. 36-44.

See: “Emigratsionnye nastroeniia—2020: gde rodilsia, tam i prigodilsia,” VTsIOM, No. 4325, 7 September, 2020, available at [https://wciom.ru/index.php id=236&uid=10431].

See: S.Yu. Sivoplyasova, E.P. Sigareva, “Nekotorye aspekty migratsionnoi motivatsii rossiiskoi molodezhi,” Narodonaselenie, No. 2, 2014, pp. 65-71.

Ibidem.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

Issue

Section

ETHNIC RELATIONS AND MIGRATION

How to Cite

SIGAREVA, E., & SIVOPLYASOVA, S. (2021). REPRODUCTIVE AND MIGRATION ATTITUDES OF CONTEMPORARY YOUTH OF THE EAEU STATES (RUSSIA, KAZAKHSTAN, KYRGYZSTAN: A CASE STUDY). CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 22(2), 122-139. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/711

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1110

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)