THE IDENTITY OF KAZAKHSTANI YOUTH: IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION AND NEOTRADITIONALISM

Authors

  • Baizhol KARIPBAYEV D.Sc. (Philos.), Professor, Buketov Karaganda State University (Karaganda, Kazakhstan) Author

Keywords:

Kazakhstani youth, identity, values, ethnicity, religiosity, patriotism, education

Abstract

The article analyzes the value orientations of modern student youth in Kazakhstan that influence the formation of their identity. Based on the analysis of this social group’s value alignments, the article attempts to determine the vital problem areas in the formation of the character of young people as those capable of taking responsibility for their own destiny and the destiny of their country. Special attention is heeded to ethnic, religious and civic identities. The ratio of civil and ethnic identities among Kazakhstani student youth is assessed. A growth tendency in the norms of individualism and indifference to traditional forms of identity is revealed. Particular attention is paid to the influence of traditional and modernization values on the self-awareness of Kazakhstani youth. This research perspective was selected deliberately. The current state of public relations—both global, and Kazakhstani in particular—is determined by active ambiguous, multi-directional transformation processes. Under these circumstances, the issue of identity becomes especially acute for young people, and a search for sources of worldviews ensues to help young people formulate and self-actualize their own essence and to construct their own view of the world. In the course of this search, it is crucial to avoid becoming an object of various kinds of ideological, spiritual, ideological manipulation and recruiting. The modern contemporary social reality engenders a wide variety of spiritual practices, ideological revelations and political modules. It is essential for a young person to make the right choice based on objective knowledge and understanding. Under the circumstances, a special responsibility is imposed on the education system. Unfortunately, the modern higher education system in Kazakhstan pays special attention to the rigid specialization of graduates as part of the current vigorous reforms. Purely professional training is becoming a priority, while the issues of socio-humanitarian, ideological training of our future specialists remain on the margins of the educational system, which, in turn, impedes their successful socialization. It is in these epistemological coordinates that this article was prepared. The article is based on the data obtained through a sociological study conducted in 2019 as part of the project “Formation of the Concept of Religious Tolerance and Ethnic Consolidation in Educational Formats of Modern Kazakhstan.” 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

See: “Studencheskaia molodezh: sotsialnyy portret,” Astana, 2014, available at [https://eljastary.kz/articles/63/0], 20 July, 2019.

See: Report on the Research Work “Kazakhstani Youth as a Strategic Resource of the Society of Universal Labor” (interim)—The Youth Scientific-Research Center, Astana, 2016 (in Russian).

See: B.G. Nurzhanov, “Globalizatsia: zakat natsionnosti ili rastsvet etnichnosti?” in: Ustoychivost etnokulturnykh sistem v kontekste dinamiki globalizatsii. Materialy gorodskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Almaty, 2012, pp. 79-88.

See: B.I. Karipbayev, Transformations of National Consciousness in the Modernization Context of Modern Kazakhstan,Print shop, Karaganda, 2019.2011.

See: O.A. Simonova, “K formirovaniiu sotsiologii identichnosti,” Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, No. 3, 2008, pp. 45—61.

See: Yu.V. Popkov, S.A. Madyukova, “Fenomen sotsiokulturnogo neotraditsionalizma,” Aleteiia, St. Petersburg,

See: V.A. Lapshin, “Formy neotraditsionalizma: Severo-Zapadnyy federalnyy okrug,” Nauchno-issledovatelskaia baza dannykh “Rossiyskiye modeli arkhaizatsii i neotraditsionalizatsii,” 2014, available at [http://neoregion.ru/szfo.html?PH PSESSID=1ce91e1b3a57218d3c4ab30aa05a582e], 14 December, 2018.

See: A. Giddens, Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives, Profile, London, 1999.

See: Ye.G. Vialova, “Identichnost molodezhi v kontekste sovremennykh filosofskikh issledovaniy,” Bulletin of Kalmyk University, No. 2 (30), 2016, p. 130.

See: G. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1934; P. Berger, T. Lukmann, The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge, Penguin Books, London, 1966; A. Giddens, The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1984; A. Touraine, Le retour de l’acteur. Essai de sociologie, Librairie Arthème Fayard, Paris, 1984, 350 pp.

See: O.A. Simonova, op. cit.

See: E. Erikson, Childhood and Society, 2nd Edition, Norton, New York, 1963.

See: E. Erikson, Identity, Youth and Crisis, Norton, New York, 1968.

See: E. Erikson, Childhood and Society.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

Issue

Section

ETHNIC RELATIONS AND MIGRATION

How to Cite

KARIPBAYEV, B. (2021). THE IDENTITY OF KAZAKHSTANI YOUTH: IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION AND NEOTRADITIONALISM. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 22(2), 140-149. https://ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/712

Plaudit

Similar Articles

31-40 of 298

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.